Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

AFR Install

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-27-2005, 01:00 PM
  #1  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
 
SAM98WS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: harrisburg, pa
Posts: 1,205
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default AFR Install

Ok Dudes...I got hammered by some of you for questioning other AFR installs...and praised by others for asking the right questions. I realize some people are going to buy AFRs just because they say AFR and because on other motors they DO have a history. Im hoping for BIG numbers here.

I am a fan of the Tech Talk AFR has done here. AFRs do better than crappy LS1 ported heads thats for sure. It just always seemed to me like in all the other AFR threads someone was trying to hide something. Im not going to forget CR and A/F ratio like others have. Im not trying to forget or hide anything. If you dont see it..ask...if its not here its because I dont know..My goal here is to give you some more data so you can choose what is best for you. I told my buddy if it was my car I wouldnt put the AFRs on without milling them based on what Ive seen on the net so there is only one way to find out how good they are...here goes:

2000 Camaro SS M6 low miles
LS6 Intake
FLP 1 3/4 LT headers without Cats
Magnaflow Cat back
LS1 Motorsports Airlid
K&N
Dyno Tuned
Everything else is stock..even the 3.42 rear
Dyno shows SAE 344.8rwhp @ 5500rpm and 350rwtq @ 4500-4700rpm. The A/F was 12.6 across the board.

Installing
AFR 205 Heads
the heads are going to be cut .025” for a 62cc chamber
use a .054” head gasket, CR ~10.9:1
230/234 114+2 573/.578.
Custom Length Pushrods
Rollmaster Timing Set
Ported Oil Pump
SVO 30lb Injectors
Crane Quick Lift Rocker 1.7
Ported Stock TB
85mm MAF and adapter
ASP UD Pulley
SPEC Stage 3 clutch
Upgraded master and slave
Dyno Tuned

Comments before we put it under the knife? I have my own opinion on how much power this combo should make based on other installs, rear and the dynojet. Tune in Next week for result...
Old 01-27-2005, 01:07 PM
  #2  
jrp
SN95 Director
iTrader: (16)
 
jrp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Valencia, Ca
Posts: 10,755
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

lol, and i thought it was going to be you installing the AFR's on your 383. like anything on paper it looks great. are you guys going to degree the cam in or dot to dot? also, why the .054 gasket? and what length pushrods are you guys going with?
Old 01-27-2005, 01:42 PM
  #3  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
 
SAM98WS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: harrisburg, pa
Posts: 1,205
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jrp
lol, and i thought it was going to be you installing the AFR's on your 383. like anything on paper it looks great. are you guys going to degree the cam in or dot to dot? also, why the .054 gasket? and what length pushrods are you guys going with?

lol..nah..Im keeping my good heads.
Degreeing the cam.
.054 because of P/V and CR...safe
we'll see what length is proper when its assembled.

Last edited by SAM98WS6; 01-27-2005 at 02:02 PM.
Old 01-27-2005, 02:33 PM
  #4  
Registered User
iTrader: (15)
 
Unaffliated Racing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 873
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

If that's what you are worrying about...why cut the head then run a thicker gasket? Doesn't that just defeat the purpose......
Old 01-27-2005, 03:01 PM
  #5  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
 
SAM98WS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: harrisburg, pa
Posts: 1,205
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

thats what the owner chose to do...not my car.
Old 01-27-2005, 03:08 PM
  #6  
Registered User
iTrader: (15)
 
Unaffliated Racing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 873
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

lol...umm..ok...weird
Old 01-27-2005, 03:08 PM
  #7  
Flow Wizard
iTrader: (13)
 
Tony Mamo @ AFR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,197
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Unaffiliated Racing
If that's what you are worrying about...why cut the head then run a thicker gasket? Doesn't that just defeat the purpose......
I agree...why not mill the head less and run the thinner .040 gasket....same CR with much better quench....even less prone to detonation and probably worth a couple of HP as well. I would run the .040 gasket AND the milled head you currently have...but I'm sure you guys are trying to avoid notching pistons which always leads to a "compromised" situation. Assuming you have enough P to V with an .040 and the 62 chambers that would be a better scenario.

I'm guessing (hoping) the car will land somewhere in the 430's-440's RWHP....perhaps slightly more, but much like any other build-up I personally don't have my hands involved in (and wrenching on), there are far too many variables to consider. I would have liked to have seen the FAST 90 set-up in a combination that you are looking for "BIG" power out of....its worth a solid 15-20 over the LS6/ported TB combo. Also, I would have notched pistons and shaved the heads to 59 cc's with an .040 gasket. More static compression is needed with a 230+ cam than a say a 224/224 "street" cam.

Just my quick .02 on what I glanced over quickly...

Sam....Consider trying a set of AFR 225's on your stroker after you dyno your "good" heads. If your unhappy with the dyno results I will take them back...(used, covered in oil), and send you a 100% refund. I'm confident we won't be seeing them again.....

Regards to all,
Tony M.
Old 01-27-2005, 03:10 PM
  #8  
Registered User
iTrader: (15)
 
Unaffliated Racing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 873
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Dang tony..that a hell of a deal. You know who this is right?...your buddy Brian.
Old 01-27-2005, 03:14 PM
  #9  
jrp
SN95 Director
iTrader: (16)
 
jrp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Valencia, Ca
Posts: 10,755
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

agreed Tony.

Sam's running some Rapid Motor 5.7's unmilled if i recall. he's making great power with them, i'd be very interested what some 225's would do on his combo.
Old 01-28-2005, 12:15 AM
  #10  
Teching In
 
99Transamman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Orange Park
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Tony
I'd be more than happy to take you up on the offer to change the heads out on a 383.......I've all ready sold the patriots i had on to get some 225's. The only thing that I added was a 9in rear end everything else stayed the same so we'll see how much we pick up over patriots. Mike norris is going to tune it again so this will be a good test
Old 01-28-2005, 06:38 AM
  #11  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
 
SAM98WS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: harrisburg, pa
Posts: 1,205
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Thats a heck of an offer Tony but not really a fair comparison. I put down 480rwhp and 440rwtq with off the shelf Rapid Stage 2 65cc LS1 2.02/1.57 heads and Cometic .042...heavy steel driveshaft..4.11 Moser, stock 17inch wheels, air filter in and 92 octane. Stock water pump, belts on etc..just like I drive it. My low lift flow numbers are very good too...daily driver. I didnt have the money for the Rapid LS6 heads and an easy 500+rwhp.

If your AFR 225s (which werent available at the time) didnt put down 500+rwhp in my combo I would send them back to you too I believe they would but I still dont have $2000+ to find out...unless I get a deal too good to pass up....

My buddy doesnt have the money for LSX90mm...but I would consider what he is doing a typical install for the average joe. Remember too he has the stock rear with 3.42s.

Last edited by SAM98WS6; 01-28-2005 at 06:52 AM.
Old 01-28-2005, 03:01 PM
  #12  
LS1TECH Sponsor
iTrader: (6)
 
mikey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Reading, PA
Posts: 2,102
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Remember also Sam, your cam is a 242/250/109. Not the best LS for making high dyno (hp) numbers. Go 113 LS and see what happens
Old 01-28-2005, 08:26 PM
  #13  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (3)
 
mrr23's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: orlando, fl
Posts: 4,266
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

not trying to be an ***, and i know it's a customers car and all. but, how are you going to find out how good/bad the heads are by adding a cam along with it? remember, i'm being nice here.
Old 01-28-2005, 08:44 PM
  #14  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (19)
 
Slow Z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: My house
Posts: 3,337
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Tony Mamo @ AFR
Sam....Consider trying a set of AFR 225's on your stroker after you dyno your "good" heads. If your unhappy with the dyno results I will take them back...(used, covered in oil), and send you a 100% refund. I'm confident we won't be seeing them again.....

Regards to all,
Tony M.
Hell,k I got a 382 All bore comparing numbers up against a set of ARE LS1 heads Stage 3. haha, i'm wanting to get the AFR 225's, just been saying that they aren't available yet for higher compression. am i right on this reading? Tax returns are coming, haha.
Old 01-29-2005, 08:43 AM
  #15  
LS1TECH Sponsor
iTrader: (6)
 
mikey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Reading, PA
Posts: 2,102
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by z28kid98
Hell,k I got a 382 All bore comparing numbers up against a set of ARE LS1 heads Stage 3. haha, i'm wanting to get the AFR 225's, just been saying that they aren't available yet for higher compression. am i right on this reading? Tax returns are coming, haha.
Not yet. 62cc 225's are a way's off yet. Since you are all bore this is really what you need.

Mikey - Rapid Motorsports
Old 01-31-2005, 08:41 AM
  #16  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
 
SAM98WS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: harrisburg, pa
Posts: 1,205
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mrr23
not trying to be an ***, and i know it's a customers car and all. but, how are you going to find out how good/bad the heads are by adding a cam along with it? remember, i'm being nice here.
"My goal here is to give you some more data so you can choose what is best for you." first post..
Old 01-31-2005, 08:52 AM
  #17  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (3)
 
mrr23's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: orlando, fl
Posts: 4,266
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

and i thank you for that data. but, in the same first post you said this:

Originally Posted by sam98ws6
told my buddy if it was my car I wouldnt put the AFRs on without milling them based on what Ive seen on the net so there is only one way to find out how good they are...here goes:
and that is why i asked how are you going to find out how good/bad they are if you are adding a cam to the mix as well.

again, i and everyone here will appreciate the data you will give.
Old 02-01-2005, 07:05 AM
  #18  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
 
SAM98WS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: harrisburg, pa
Posts: 1,205
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

160 T-stat installed also.

Fired up today...dyno in a day or two...
Old 02-01-2005, 07:53 AM
  #19  
Staging Lane
 
Flareside's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 91
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by mrr23
and i thank you for that data. but, in the same first post you said this:



and that is why i asked how are you going to find out how good/bad they are if you are adding a cam to the mix as well.

again, i and everyone here will appreciate the data you will give.
Yea, I thought the same thing when I read this. It's an interesting test for sure, but there's nothing specific about the quality of AFR heads here. Too many things are being changed to know how much of a difference the heads made.
Old 02-01-2005, 08:35 AM
  #20  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
 
SAM98WS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: harrisburg, pa
Posts: 1,205
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Since I think this is a very typical install...cam/heads on an LS1...most people will form an opinion on how good the AFRs are compared to other heads. There have been enough installs here to make a call and this will compare to other installs posted in which the numbers were different than these are going to be.

Last edited by SAM98WS6; 02-01-2005 at 09:46 AM.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:53 AM.