View Full Version : 12.50 @ 114 car puts down 308? 11.5@ 125.5 puts down 376


Tiger2o69
02-07-2005, 10:11 PM
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v204/charisma_71/dyno.jpg


Possible? Any idea what my inj. pulse rate should be? It was at mid 22-23... I think I was really really rich...

times are not a fluke think i have ran very close more than several times...

Just trying to figure out if this is just possible or was there something wrong w/ my tune.

Tiger2o69
02-07-2005, 10:11 PM
2002 A4 Z28

Magnaflow Exhaust/K&N filter/Free Mods/LS6 Block/NGK TR55 Plugs/3.42 Gears/Clear MTI Lid/Porter TB/Aluminum D.S/Smooth Bellow/ M/T ET Streets/ Flowtechs Headers/ FLowtech ORY/HP Tuners/160* Hyperstat/Lower control arms/relocation brackets/TnT Nitrous
Ram Air II Hood/C5 Rims/Nitto 555E Tires


1/4- 12.50 @ 114...60'-1.97 (street tires)........ TnT 11.5@ 125.5 60'-1.89 (m/t)
1/8- 8.05@ 92.5 (street tires)........................ TnT 7.52@ 97.9 same run

LS1SS4ever
02-08-2005, 04:42 AM
great time, with cam and ratio u will get better:)

Turo
02-08-2005, 01:26 PM
i dont know man, i say dyno again. those dyno numbers just seem WAY too low for the times you're running, unless your car is really really light.

Tiger2o69
02-08-2005, 02:01 PM
3650-70 depending on gas. thats a pretty empty tank there.

turbogarrett
02-08-2005, 07:03 PM
Is that on a dynojet or mustang dyno? With those trap speeds and that weight those numbers seem ~60 rwhp too low? My 2800 lb ls1 rx7 only trapped a hair under 120 with 360 rwhp on a dynojet.

Tiger2o69
02-08-2005, 07:17 PM
Is that on a dynojet or mustang dyno? With those trap speeds and that weight those numbers seem ~60 rwhp too low? My 2800 lb ls1 rx7 only trapped a hair under 120 with 360 rwhp on a dynojet.thank you...lol

everyone wants to say oh its ok just a low dyno and runs good. from physics this ddoesnt add up..I have someone looking over the logs now. I think I was going so rich it killed the hp...

I think its a dyno jet btw

I know one guy dynoed 344 and ran .2 thenths slower like 4 hours later at the track. Trap was 2mph slower as well. He had slightly better 60's than I did.

Nitrous he put down like 440 to my 376 and I run the same time w/ a 95 trap to his 90.... I only sprayed from 50 up to his spraying out of the whole...

RUSH
02-08-2005, 08:32 PM
Is that on a dynojet or mustang dyno? With those trap speeds and that weight those numbers seem ~60 rwhp too low? My 2800 lb ls1 rx7 only trapped a hair under 120 with 360 rwhp on a dynojet.
Sounds like a mustang Dyno to me :confused:

CarsRFun
02-20-2005, 11:09 AM
nice torque....

hc_performance
02-20-2005, 11:28 PM
Sounds like a mustang Dyno to me :confused:
Nope its a dynojet. This dyno has been known to read sometimes 20-30 rwhp less than others in the same conditions.

DocEwww
02-20-2005, 11:36 PM
damn and I thought my 12.464 @ 111.85 with 330rwhp was impressive...does sound like ur numbers are way lower than they should be with a 114 trap.

thenewb
02-21-2005, 01:18 AM
340hp on a slightly skewed dyno.... 12.35 at 111

very common with other kind of cars because they buy slicks and gears for the car first...... most ls1 owners are to scared to put some gear and tire under the car then wondor why a 400hp car is running 12's :drive:

Tiger2o69
02-21-2005, 08:25 PM
340hp on a slightly skewed dyno.... 12.35 at 111

very common with other kind of cars because they buy slicks and gears for the car first...... most ls1 owners are to scared to put some gear and tire under the car then wondor why a 400hp car is running 12's :drive:

My thoughts exackly :D People laughed when i said one of the 1st mods should be et streets.... But then i beat cammed cars all the time. :) So hmmm

However trap shows a lot... I think it was the tune.... I found out in the tuning section when i scaled the maf it creates a mess...