Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Anyone running a cam with stock exhaust manifolds

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-22-2005, 11:15 PM
  #1  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
NBM2k2SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 114
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Anyone running a cam with stock exhaust manifolds

Just woundering if it is ok to run a cam on stock exhuast manifolds?
Old 02-22-2005, 11:23 PM
  #2  
777
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (21)
 
777's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Jacksonville, FL
Posts: 6,697
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

you can if you only want to gain about 1/4-1/2 the power out of the cam...seriously the exhaust manifolds really take away a cam...depending on size of the cam...definatly get the supporting mods before the cam you will thank yourself later
Old 02-22-2005, 11:30 PM
  #3  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (8)
 
ss rally red's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Destin FL
Posts: 4,298
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I ran a Hotcam on stock manifolds and picked up .5 tenths and 6 mph on a lid/LM & 4.10's. 13.3's @107 vs. 12.80's @113. Stock time was at Beech Bend at the 02 gathering at Bowling Green in Aug. of 02. HC times were at Gafba. shootout in Aug. of 03. Same temps/conditions.
Old 02-22-2005, 11:31 PM
  #4  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (7)
 
01_SuperSlow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: SoCal
Posts: 1,214
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

stock exhaust manifolds will choke an aftermarket cam. Do LT's first, you won't regret it. Even the stock cam benefits from the addition of LT's.
Old 02-22-2005, 11:55 PM
  #5  
TECH Senior Member
 
2MuchRiceMakesMeSick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Texas
Posts: 6,157
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

This is a terriable idea not only from a hp/gain stand point but from a tuning stand point.
Old 02-23-2005, 12:12 AM
  #6  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (1)
 
Taspeed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Arlington, TX
Posts: 636
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

man...give someone a call at fastech...hell any of the sponsors. You can find a cheap set of longtubes for around 300 or so. Pacesetters, or hookers. I personally don't care for the flowtech's, but they are cheap as well. Really pointless to do a decent cam without headers.
Old 02-23-2005, 07:52 AM
  #7  
Staging Lane
 
Flareside's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 91
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by NBM2k2SS
Just woundering if it is ok to run a cam on stock exhuast manifolds?
You can get good gains from a cam along with stock manifolds, but it all depends on your goals. You'll need a cam with a shorter, more aggressive intake lobe, and a longer exhaust lobe (wider split) that can deal with the extra backpressure of a stock exhaust. The popular cams around here, "224/228", etc., we're never designed for a stock exhaust, so when people run them without headers they're disappointed.

Headers are not without trade offs. They let more heat into the car, they're louder, most dealers won't touch the car with them (if you have a warranty), they usually reduce ground clearance and scrape on bumps, the 02 sensors sometimes complain and then have to be disabled, etc.
Old 02-23-2005, 07:55 AM
  #8  
Moderator
iTrader: (11)
 
jimmyblue's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: East Central Florida
Posts: 12,605
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts

Default

I think it depends on how much cam and what else is up
with the exhaust. If it's a smallish one with an exhaust bias
then it'll be a decent wake-up, without emissions / tuning
hassles that headers bring. Sure, it won't give you as much
output improvement as a "proper" exhaust. But there may
be other considerations that make it not-that-stupid (like,
say, visual smog inspection *****).

If you have a good reason for staying stock-exhaust I'd
say to get some help in selecting a sensible cam for that
reality. It probably won't be what people now consider
"decent" but something like an Old Man or Stealth, Z06-
like would not be such a terrible thing.

I'll probably be sticking with manifolds (and gutted cats)
for a while, but putting on heads and a baby cam. I know
it'll be exhaust-limited but I can live with that, until those
$400 stainless headers start cluttering up the market
Old 02-23-2005, 07:58 AM
  #9  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (10)
 
NHRATA01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Dutchess, New York
Posts: 1,797
Received 27 Likes on 22 Posts

Default

You can do it, I ran a T1 (.558/221) on stock manifolds for a year, and had solid gains - trap went from 108 to 111ish, made 365 at the wheels on a dyno.

I would not run any monster .600" lift, 230+ duration cam though, that would be a waste because it won't breathe. But if you run something moderate like a TR224, B1/T1, hotcam, or something say <225 duration, <.560 on lift, I think you'll have some nice gains on the stock manifolds. Esp on an '00+ car with the better design.
Old 02-23-2005, 08:43 AM
  #10  
LS1 Tech Administrator
iTrader: (14)
 
Patrick G's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Victoria, TX
Posts: 8,244
Likes: 0
Received 31 Likes on 27 Posts

Default

Yes, don't listen to the guys that say you HAVE to run headers. You don't. If it's your choice to stick with manifolds, then just make sure your cam has 0 degrees of overlap at .050" lift or LESS! The overlap of aggressive cams need to breathe and therefore need headers. If you keep the overlap in check, you can make a lot of power gains and still keep your stock exhaust.

As an FYI, the TR 224/224 112 cam has 0 overlap at .050". It's about as big as you'd want to go.
__________________

2013 Corvette Grand Sport A6 LME forged 416, Greg Good ported TFS 255 LS3 heads, 222/242 .629"/.604" 121LSA Pat G blower cam, ARH 1 7/8" headers, ESC Novi 1500 Supercharger w/8 rib direct drive conversion, 747rwhp/709rwtq on 93 octane, 801rwhp/735rwtq on race fuel, 10.1 @ 147.25mph 1/4 mile, 174.7mph Half Mile.
2016 Corvette Z51 M7 Magnuson Heartbeat 2300 supercharger, TSP LT headers, Pat G tuned, 667rwhp, 662rwtq, 191mph TX Mile.
2009.5 Pontiac G8 GT 6.0L, A6, AFR 230v2 heads. 506rwhp/442rwtq. 11.413 @ 121.29mph 1/4 mile, 168.7mph TX Mile
2000 Pewter Ram Air Trans Am M6 heads/cam 508 rwhp/445 rwtq SAE, 183.092 TX Mile
2018 Cadillac Escalade 6.2L A10 Pat G tuned.
LS1,LS2,LS3,LS7,LT1 Custom Camshaft Specialist For custom camshaft help press here.
Custom LSX tuning in person or via email press here.
Old 02-23-2005, 12:26 PM
  #11  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (2)
 
nuzee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Hawaii
Posts: 618
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I gained ~3 mph in the 1/8 but only 1 mph in the 1/4 traps by swapping to the CompCams 206/212 cam. Then I added 1.85 rockers and gained another 2 mph in the 1/4. So I went from 107.5s to 110.5s with just the cam & rocker arms on stock manifolds & cutout. I've proved to myself that there is room for cam-only improvements using the stock manifolds. But as others have said, you shouldn't go too radical on the overlap.
Old 02-23-2005, 12:36 PM
  #12  
FormerVendor
iTrader: (1)
 
HumpinSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Waldorf, MD
Posts: 3,059
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I did a Fm13 on stock manifolds and the car slowed down and ran like ****. That is what i dgot for being cheap. After the headers it was liek a night and day difference



Quick Reply: Anyone running a cam with stock exhaust manifolds



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:15 AM.