Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

<.550 Lift Cams Waste Stock LS1 Head Potential?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-04-2005, 06:21 PM
  #1  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
jpolser's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: McKinney, TX
Posts: 141
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default <.550 Lift Cams Waste Stock LS1 Head Potential?

I've got a 232/236 cam with a .548/.552 lift on a 112.

Is having a cam with a lift such as this going to waste away the potential of the stock heads since they continue to increase flow to .600?
Old 03-04-2005, 06:30 PM
  #2  
11 & 7 Second Clubs
 
Race Car Driver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Motorhome, Freeways, Truckstops, Pits
Posts: 1,299
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Seems like a question for some type of ASE exam. I agree that your cam has a lot of duration for such mild lift, which seems strange and it probably is not the "best" cam for stock heads.
Old 03-04-2005, 06:37 PM
  #3  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
jpolser's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: McKinney, TX
Posts: 141
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

If that's the case, it's not the best cam for any application wouldn't you say? Aftermarkets are only going to flow more. I haven't put the cam in because I want to do it right the first time, however I bought it for cheap and will install it if I'm not sacrificing much power.

How much power do ya'll think I'd be giving up by going with this cam instead of a cam of the same duration with 600 lift?
Old 03-04-2005, 06:44 PM
  #4  
jrp
SN95 Director
iTrader: (16)
 
jrp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Valencia, Ca
Posts: 10,755
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

from .500 to .700 lift there is only an 8 cfm difference.
Old 03-04-2005, 06:46 PM
  #5  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
jpolser's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: McKinney, TX
Posts: 141
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

How much in terms of power loss am I giving up by not taking advantage of that though?
Old 03-04-2005, 06:46 PM
  #6  
11 & 7 Second Clubs
 
Race Car Driver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Motorhome, Freeways, Truckstops, Pits
Posts: 1,299
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

If this is going to be a cam-only car with otherwise stock longblock, trying to make maximum hp, then I would go with something like the Trex cam. I would also PM some of the top cam-only guys and ask them.
Old 03-04-2005, 06:49 PM
  #7  
Moderator
iTrader: (13)
 
thechef's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: milford,CT
Posts: 4,718
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

you will be at about 400rwhp with all the bolt ons and proper tuning
i run a cam VERY close to that and have had it for 45k miles and 2 years of daily driving
IMO you will like that cam alot and with heads it will only get better
Old 03-04-2005, 06:52 PM
  #8  
TECH Addict
 
Another_User's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,826
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jrp
from .500 to .700 lift there is only an 8 cfm difference.
Exactly the point I was going to make.



Quick Reply: <.550 Lift Cams Waste Stock LS1 Head Potential?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:01 PM.