Dynamometer Results & Comparisons - Stock 98-00 LS1 f-body dyno #'s
03-09-2003, 08:26 AM
Lately I have been hearing how the 01-02 F-bodies recieved some of the LS6 blocks. Supposedly these cars dynoed higher, just wondering what you guys with 98-00 LS1s dynoed at stock
03-09-2003, 09:00 AM
288rwhp bone stock. I now have 157 more rwhp. <img border="0" title="" alt="[Smile]" src="gr_stretch.gif" />
03-09-2003, 02:07 PM
I have one of the highest dyno'ing 98-00 LS1 F-bodies that I know of...
BONE stock down to the paper filter: 315 RWHP
Macs, ORP, Lid, pulley, catback free mods: 351 RWHP
This is a 98 LS1, with an LS1 intake. I am pretty confident my car would have done 360 rwhp easily with an LS6 intake and Longtube headers. Oh well, she was strong for her day but now there's a whooooooole new ballgame under the hood <img border="0" title="" alt="[Big Grin]" src="gr_grin.gif" />
<small>[ March 09, 2003, 02:08 PM: Message edited by: Damian ]</small>
03-09-2003, 05:26 PM
294 RWHP w/ K&N and GMAS,4200 miles.
03-09-2003, 05:53 PM
Mine did 291/308 stock with 1700 miles.
03-09-2003, 11:49 PM
315/328 with airlid only.
One [Z28] Punch
03-10-2003, 07:49 PM
just for comparisons sake:
02 Z28, lid and catback.
<img border="0" alt="[cheers]" title="" src="graemlins/gr_cheers.gif" />
<small>[ March 10, 2003, 07:50 PM: Message edited by: One [Z28] Punch ]</small>
I dynoed @ 299 rwhp with 100 miles on my 2000 Z28.
03-12-2003, 12:37 AM
'99 T/A M6
305/318 Lid & catback
03-12-2003, 08:03 PM
319rwhp/338rwtq bone stock
<small>[ March 12, 2003, 08:04 PM: Message edited by: Optimus WS6 ]</small>
03-21-2003, 01:36 PM
Are these 310+ stock numbers SAE or "as tested?"
With a lid & filter, cat-back, and programming & T-stat from HyperTech, I put down 310.6/328.0 SAE.
<img border="0" alt="[USA]" title="" src="graemlins/patriot.gif" />
03-21-2003, 02:03 PM
</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Originally posted by WhitePheonix:
<strong>Lately I have been hearing how the 01-02 F-bodies recieved some of the LS6 blocks. Supposedly these cars dynoed higher, just wondering what you guys with 98-00 LS1s dynoed at stock </strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Many of the '01s/'02s do dyno a little bit higher but I think it's more to do with the LS6 intake (and slight cam change/no EGR etc.) than the block. The LS6 block thing is still more of a rumor/possibility situation than actual fact as well I think.
I've never dyno'd my automatic '00 Z28 but it has trapped as high as 109.39 which is quite high for a stock convertor, stock geared, stock internal, stock exhaust automatic with some very mild mods and minor weight reduction.
03-21-2003, 02:59 PM
312 rwhp hp SAE DynoJet at two different facilities. Brothers in Corona CA, and R&D in Reseda. Car had 800 and 1000 mi respectively.
Pulls were 311,312,311 and 312,312,310. 32PSI in tires, Syntec oil, OEM air filter.
2000 SS Camaro M6 with Y2Y options.
03-21-2003, 07:58 PM
<img border="0" title="" alt="[Cool]" src="gr_images/icons/cool.gif" />
03-21-2003, 10:05 PM
Just to dispell the myth that "all" '01-'02's dyno higher than the '98-'00's:
My '02 dynoed @ 298.4rwhp & 320.0rwtq SAE corrected with 1,263 miles at Speed Inc. Those #'s seem right on average for an LS1 of any model year IMO.
While I do agree that the '01's & '02's seem to be a bit stronger than the three years before, I don't think the differnce is as big as some might think. How the car runs at the track will tell the real story.
And BTW, dyno #'s will vary from dynojet to dynojet. I've seen where some car's have dynoed 10-20rwhp more on a different dyno with the EXACT same set-up. Not real reliable info IMO.
Take it to the strip to find out how fast the car really is. <img border="0" title="" alt="[Wink]" src="gr_images/icons/wink.gif" />
03-22-2003, 01:28 PM
stock 98 311hp six speed
vBulletin® v3.7.4, Copyright ©2000-2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.