My day with Air Team.
#1
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Bloomington, IN
Posts: 1,101
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
My day with Air Team.
*pulls into emissions lane*
*car is loping hard as hell*
Air Team Guy: That **** sounds pissed off.
Me: Yeah, she is pretty pissed
Air Team Guy: You know, if you don't pass I can send you somewhere that isnt as strict as we are
Me: Thanks.
*Air Team Guy plugs in the OBD cord into my car*
Air Team Guy: Normally takes about 30-45 seconds
*after 10 seconds, printer starts printing my results*
Air Team Guy: Not looking good man.
*Air Team Guy looks at sheet, and pauses*
Air Team Guy: Here, you passed.
Me: I know, thanks.
*Leaves emissions lane*
*car is loping hard as hell*
Air Team Guy: That **** sounds pissed off.
Me: Yeah, she is pretty pissed
Air Team Guy: You know, if you don't pass I can send you somewhere that isnt as strict as we are
Me: Thanks.
*Air Team Guy plugs in the OBD cord into my car*
Air Team Guy: Normally takes about 30-45 seconds
*after 10 seconds, printer starts printing my results*
Air Team Guy: Not looking good man.
*Air Team Guy looks at sheet, and pauses*
Air Team Guy: Here, you passed.
Me: I know, thanks.
*Leaves emissions lane*
#6
LS1Tech Administrator
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Schiller Park, IL Member: #317
Posts: 32,033
Likes: 0
Received 1,483 Likes
on
1,067 Posts
Originally Posted by BlkZ28LS6
LOL, nice. I hope Cook County is the same way with emissions whenever my time comes.
#7
LS1Tech Administrator
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Schiller Park, IL Member: #317
Posts: 32,033
Likes: 0
Received 1,483 Likes
on
1,067 Posts
Originally Posted by Smoke_Ford
*pulls into emissions lane*
*car is loping hard as hell*
Air Team Guy: That **** sounds pissed off.
Me: Yeah, she is pretty pissed
Air Team Guy: You know, if you don't pass I can send you somewhere that isnt as strict as we are
Me: Thanks.
*Air Team Guy plugs in the OBD cord into my car*
Air Team Guy: Normally takes about 30-45 seconds
*after 10 seconds, printer starts printing my results*
Air Team Guy: Not looking good man.
*Air Team Guy looks at sheet, and pauses*
Air Team Guy: Here, you passed.
Me: I know, thanks.
*Leaves emissions lane*
*car is loping hard as hell*
Air Team Guy: That **** sounds pissed off.
Me: Yeah, she is pretty pissed
Air Team Guy: You know, if you don't pass I can send you somewhere that isnt as strict as we are
Me: Thanks.
*Air Team Guy plugs in the OBD cord into my car*
Air Team Guy: Normally takes about 30-45 seconds
*after 10 seconds, printer starts printing my results*
Air Team Guy: Not looking good man.
*Air Team Guy looks at sheet, and pauses*
Air Team Guy: Here, you passed.
Me: I know, thanks.
*Leaves emissions lane*
Trending Topics
#8
wrencher
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 4,762
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by RPM WS6
See Ryan, told ya it'd go just fine.
#10
LS1Tech Administrator
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Schiller Park, IL Member: #317
Posts: 32,033
Likes: 0
Received 1,483 Likes
on
1,067 Posts
Originally Posted by wrencher
I hope it stays this way. The envirotest/ IEPA know what is going on here, I talk to them. Are they gonna do anything about it? Hopefully not.
Gotta look at it this way, probably 95+% of '96-up cars have stock manifolds/cats and stock PCMs that should/do pass the scan without any tricks. So is it worth the EPA's time and money to invent revised software to better detect that 5% of offenders?
I certainly don't work for the EPA so I don't have the answers to these questions, but it seems that all they can really do at this point is try and close all the windows left open by OBD II when OBD III or whatever it'll be called in final revision is put mainstream.
What have you heard from your sources on OBD II replacements?.... I hear that some German manufacturers will be moving away from 12v electrical systems in the near future to feed higher electrical system demands, plus with DOD showing up in more and more cars is the end for OBD II's lone ability to control these systems nearing? Will there be secondary add-ons to ODB II or a full replacement system?? Just thinking out loud here.......
Last edited by RPM WS6; 03-21-2005 at 11:15 PM.
#11
wrencher
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 4,762
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by RPM WS6
I don't really see how they could/would. Since IL has mandated all '96 and up cars to OBD scan, how can they "single out" certain cars for sniffer tests? As far as I know, there isn't even an optional sniffer for the '96-up cars anymore. So what meathod of test would they use? And how would they select which cars to use it on? People modify all types of cars, so would they raise the eyebrow on a Trans Am that ends up being totally stock but let a '96 Fleetwood with an LT4 hotcam and O2 sims slide by without a second look?
Gotta look at it this way, probably 95+% of '96-up cars have stock manifolds/cats and stock PCMs that should/do pass the scan without any tricks. So is it worth the EPA's time and money to invent revised software to better detect that 5% of offenders?
I certainly don't work for the EPA so I don't have the answers to these questions, but it seems that all they can really do at this point is try and close all the windows left open by OBD II when OBD III or whatever it'll be called in final revision is put mainstream.
What have you heard from your sources on OBD II replacements?.... I hear that some German manufacturers will be moving away from 12v electrical systems in the near future to feed higher electrical system demands, plus with DOD showing up in more and more cars is the end for OBD II's lone ability to control these systems nearing? Will there be secondary add-ons to ODB II or a full replacement system?? Just thinking out loud here.......
Gotta look at it this way, probably 95+% of '96-up cars have stock manifolds/cats and stock PCMs that should/do pass the scan without any tricks. So is it worth the EPA's time and money to invent revised software to better detect that 5% of offenders?
I certainly don't work for the EPA so I don't have the answers to these questions, but it seems that all they can really do at this point is try and close all the windows left open by OBD II when OBD III or whatever it'll be called in final revision is put mainstream.
What have you heard from your sources on OBD II replacements?.... I hear that some German manufacturers will be moving away from 12v electrical systems in the near future to feed higher electrical system demands, plus with DOD showing up in more and more cars is the end for OBD II's lone ability to control these systems nearing? Will there be secondary add-ons to ODB II or a full replacement system?? Just thinking out loud here.......
They are aware that tampering is in play though.
The state doesn't care as long as they get their federal highway funds supplied by doing the emission's testing. As long as the cars pass, they could care less.
The people we have to worry about is the federal EPA. They are looking into the tampering & how it is done.
Who knows maybe their even looking here? But if they mandate change, or monies w/be held back, guess what we're in trouble. OBD-III is coming along w/ 42 volt charging systems. There is alot of change coming our way soon. I dont expect it to get better, but hopefully the emissions situation doesn't change.