PCM Diagnostics & Tuning HP Tuners | Holley | Diablo
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

IAC position vs airflow discussion

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-30-2005, 09:07 AM
  #1  
TECH Addict
Thread Starter
iTrader: (6)
 
P Mack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 2,382
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default IAC position vs airflow discussion

With the release of hptuners 1.6 there's a new table that wasn't available for editing before, the IAC position vs effective area table. I think this could be useful for getting desired IAC position to match actual IAC position.

I think a problem people run into is when they drill their throttle body or adjust their set screw, the tb has more effective area than the pcm knows about which means the pcm will think it has to open the IAC more than it has to to get the same airflow. If you look at the IAC position vs effective area table, it is 0 up through 12 (which is in mm^2 if i remember right). Which leads me to believe the stock tb hole has an area of about 12 mm^2. If you drill the tb or adjust the set screw, you're increasing the area to more than 12 mm^2 so you should adjust the table to match. That could be done by simply shifting the table to the right.

I haven't tried this yet so i'm curious if there's anybody who has (AnotherUser?). I do have a question for the hptuners guys though. Does the IAC effective area to airflow conversion depend on the vacuum across the throttlebody (baro-map) in the OS code?
Old 03-30-2005, 10:23 AM
  #2  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (2)
 
99whitews6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 907
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Might this be a reason why I have IAC position values of 140-160 at idle with no load? I raised the set screw to 4% TPS and then zeroed it. I cant figure out why my IAC position values are so high!




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:27 AM.