PCM Diagnostics & Tuning HP Tuners | Holley | Diablo
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

IS MAF Freq output proportional to air volume?

Old 04-09-2005, 06:36 PM
  #1  
9 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
Mark98SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Fredneck, MD
Posts: 737
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default IS MAF Freq output proportional to air volume?

I'm getting P103 after WOT (wheelspin) in 1st gear. I do run a K&N & have for about a year. I cleaned the inside of the MAF with a little Brakeclean & compressed air. This has started this spring, maybe coincides with LSX install & recent tune. Using my HP Tuners logs from last year compared to this year I see my MAF Air Flow is up from about 39lb/in last year to 41lb/in this year at near red line (6800 RPM). Changes are LSX intake & reworked exhaust. I'm thinking of scaling my MAF fail threshold up by about 5% to cover the increased airflow, is this correct? The threshold is currently set at 23040. Any guidence will be appreciated.
Old 04-09-2005, 06:52 PM
  #2  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (12)
 
txhorns281's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 1,869
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Mark98SS
I'm getting P103 after WOT (wheelspin) in 1st gear. I do run a K&N & have for about a year. I cleaned the inside of the MAF with a little Brakeclean & compressed air. This has started this spring, maybe coincides with LSX install & recent tune. Using my HP Tuners logs from last year compared to this year I see my MAF Air Flow is up from about 39lb/in last year to 41lb/in this year at near red line (6800 RPM). Changes are LSX intake & reworked exhaust. I'm thinking of scaling my MAF fail threshold up by about 5% to cover the increased airflow, is this correct? The threshold is currently set at 23040. Any guidence will be appreciated.
If you're talking about MAF frequency then no. 23040 Hz I highly doubt your car will ever ever ever see. The 103 code is one of those low input ones or something right? Maybe your MAF is actually taking a dump on you...
Old 04-09-2005, 06:59 PM
  #3  
9 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
Mark98SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Fredneck, MD
Posts: 737
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

"103 - Mass Air Flow (MAF) Sensor Circuit High Frequency", straight from HP Tuners. I assume more air flow = higher frequency?
Old 04-09-2005, 07:03 PM
  #4  
9 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
Mark98SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Fredneck, MD
Posts: 737
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

If the MAF is failing does that mean it's going into SD mode? If so why is the car still as quick as last year? Or could the new mods be making up the difference?
Old 04-09-2005, 07:04 PM
  #5  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (12)
 
txhorns281's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 1,869
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Mark98SS
"103 - Mass Air Flow (MAF) Sensor Circuit High Frequency", straight from HP Tuners. I assume more air flow = higher frequency?
Ok yes, but... at 41 lbs/min, you still aren't maxing out the MAF frequencies themselves, much less a 24xxx threshold. I've taken it all the way up to 155 and barely scratched into the 10000s as far as MAF frequency goes. I dunno dude...
Old 04-09-2005, 07:05 PM
  #6  
9 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
Mark98SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Fredneck, MD
Posts: 737
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Thanks for responding. Are you using HP Tuners for scanning?
Old 04-09-2005, 07:07 PM
  #7  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (12)
 
txhorns281's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 1,869
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Mark98SS
Thanks for responding. Are you using HP Tuners for scanning?
jessir
Old 04-09-2005, 07:08 PM
  #8  
9 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
Mark98SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Fredneck, MD
Posts: 737
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I'll see if I can borrow someone's MAF to test.
Old 04-09-2005, 07:09 PM
  #9  
9 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
Mark98SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Fredneck, MD
Posts: 737
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Gonna go to the track anyway tomorrow.
Old 04-09-2005, 07:31 PM
  #10  
9 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
Mark98SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Fredneck, MD
Posts: 737
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

How do yuo read the actual MAF frequency?
Old 04-09-2005, 09:13 PM
  #11  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (36)
 
Black02SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Kokomo, IN
Posts: 3,291
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Log the MAF Freq PID in the scanner.
Old 04-09-2005, 09:28 PM
  #12  
TECH Addict
 
Another_User's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,826
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Changing your MAF fail threshold is not needed. It is like changing your gas cap because your a headlight is out. Your change in airflow is because you are making more power, and your engine is breathing better. Unless you trims were affected, there are no changes to make. Your MAF frequency output is directly proportional to airflow through the MAF, however the MAF is not always accurate, and unmetered airflow can get past. If your MAF fails you car falls back on dynamic airflow or "SD", and you will end up riding the low-octane fuel table. It sounds like you have a bad MAF. The only way you are going to max out your MAF is with forced induction.
Old 04-09-2005, 09:43 PM
  #13  
Moderator
iTrader: (11)
 
jimmyblue's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: East Central Florida
Posts: 12,605
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts

Default

Frequency increases with airflow but it's not proportional in a
linear sense. The function looks more logarithmic, a power
series fit comes out messy.

According to the Helm book P0103 sets if the MAF frequency
is greater than 13500Hz for more than 1.2 seconds. It
mentions that water getting into the MAF could cause the
code (water I suppose grossly cooling the sense resistor
and wanting more heater power = frequency than makes
sense). Also says that a poor connection in the "Ignition 1"
voltage circuit can cause DTCP0103 to set. Lastly it
mentions that EMI can induce this problem and warns
against the harness being routed near solenoids and spark
plug wires.
Old 04-09-2005, 10:07 PM
  #14  
TECH Addict
 
Another_User's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,826
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jimmyblue
Frequency increases with airflow but it's not proportional in a
linear sense. The function looks more logarithmic, a power
series fit comes out messy.

According to the Helm book P0103 sets if the MAF frequency
is greater than 13500Hz for more than 1.2 seconds. It
mentions that water getting into the MAF could cause the
code (water I suppose grossly cooling the sense resistor
and wanting more heater power = frequency than makes
sense). Also says that a poor connection in the "Ignition 1"
voltage circuit can cause DTCP0103 to set. Lastly it
mentions that EMI can induce this problem and warns
against the harness being routed near solenoids and spark
plug wires.
That's true. It's not like if you double the MAF frequency you double the airflow, or anything like that. That is why the table is there!
Old 04-10-2005, 05:39 AM
  #15  
9 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
Mark98SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Fredneck, MD
Posts: 737
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Thanks for the additional responses, as you can tell I'm new to tuning & am being cautious.
Old 04-10-2005, 09:36 AM
  #16  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
RedHardSupra's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Laurel, MD
Posts: 1,904
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

just use this spreadsheet, it's something me and TXhorns281 figured out like 2 months ago (and btw, i got a new version out, it does historical compounding of data, check it out everybody)

http://www.allmod.net/hpt/


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:26 AM.