Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Highest compression on pump gas?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-12-2005, 04:09 PM
  #1  
9 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (31)
 
tim99ws6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 3,175
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default Highest compression on pump gas?

I am in the process of milling my heads, and was wondering how much compression i could go with before running into problems with detonation and such on regular street gas(93 octane). I will be getting a dyno-tune, so what is the most realisitic compression i can run, and still realistically stay on pump gas? Any help would be appreciated!!

P.S.-I think i'm gonna shoot for around 11.5 compression. I am hoping this will help a more aggressive cam be more useable on power under the curve. Is this a valid thought? Am i going in the right direction?
Tim

Last edited by tim99ws6; 04-12-2005 at 04:21 PM.
tim99ws6 is offline  
Old 04-12-2005, 04:20 PM
  #2  
TECH Resident
 
Adrenaline_Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: K-W, Ontario
Posts: 845
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I could see this turning into a war because not many of us have a dyno at our
disposal.

Volumetric efficiency and Dynamic Compression Ratio (trapping efficiency) of
the motor are what really determine how much static compression you can use.

Cams with an early closing intake and high mechanical compression are usually
limited to 11:1 before you get into issues.

Now open the flood gates for "what if"...

AL heads, spark timing, engine temperature, quench height, plug temp, etc.

All things considered, I would personally limit the static compression to 11:1
on pump gas with a close watch on knock counts.
Adrenaline_Z is offline  
Old 04-12-2005, 04:23 PM
  #3  
9 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (31)
 
tim99ws6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 3,175
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

I was really hoping i could get away with a little more compression out of the motor than that.....hm....i'l have to talk to FMS more it seems about what this cam needs...
tim99ws6 is offline  
Old 04-12-2005, 04:26 PM
  #4  
TECH Resident
 
Adrenaline_Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: K-W, Ontario
Posts: 845
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Just curious to why you want to raise the compression for pump gas?

For comparison, I'm running 9.7:1 static compression and getting 300+ HP
with 12 second quarter miles.

What sort of valve timing are you planning to use?

Last edited by Adrenaline_Z; 04-12-2005 at 04:31 PM.
Adrenaline_Z is offline  
Old 04-12-2005, 04:31 PM
  #5  
9 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (31)
 
tim99ws6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 3,175
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Well, the cam i plan on running is pretty large, and at this point, i'm running 10.12 on stock head gaskets. I am afraid that i am gonna have to spin this motor to 7k to make good power with it. I was told by FMS I would need more compression to acheive full potential of the cam.

cam is in the 240 range duration, 111LSA, and .620 lift

I don't intend on running 12's. I was gunning more for 11's on motor, and 10's on nitrous.
tim99ws6 is offline  
Old 04-12-2005, 04:34 PM
  #6  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (6)
 
97M6Formula's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Lake in the Hills, IL
Posts: 1,838
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

it depends how much timing u wanna run too but I will be at 11:8:1 I dont think Id go higher than 12:5:1 but thats just me
97M6Formula is offline  
Old 04-12-2005, 04:39 PM
  #7  
TECH Resident
 
Adrenaline_Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: K-W, Ontario
Posts: 845
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I'm not a nitrous expert, but I think adding more compression is going to limit
your charge intake.

IOW, you can compress the **** out of small amounts of charge and get decent
power

or

you can compress a large amount of charge mildly and get more punch.

The power comes from the energy in the charge. More charge in the chamber =
more power.

You might want to ask FMS if increasing compression is a good thing with
nitrous use. I think not?
Adrenaline_Z is offline  
Old 04-12-2005, 04:40 PM
  #8  
9 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (31)
 
tim99ws6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 3,175
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

ok, thanks for the help....
tim99ws6 is offline  
Old 04-12-2005, 04:41 PM
  #9  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (6)
 
97M6Formula's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Lake in the Hills, IL
Posts: 1,838
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

actually higher compression is better for nitrous.... Lower compresssion for boost apps
97M6Formula is offline  
Old 04-12-2005, 04:42 PM
  #10  
9 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (31)
 
tim99ws6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 3,175
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 97M6Formula
actually higher compression is better for nitrous.... Lower compresssion for boost apps

i was thinking the same..
tim99ws6 is offline  
Old 04-12-2005, 04:42 PM
  #11  
TECH Resident
 
Adrenaline_Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: K-W, Ontario
Posts: 845
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

actually higher compression is better for nitrous.... Lower compresssion for boost apps
Why is that?

EDIT: Boost is boost. Nitrous adds charge volume. Please explain the difference.
Adrenaline_Z is offline  
Old 04-12-2005, 05:08 PM
  #12  
TECH Resident
 
Adrenaline_Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: K-W, Ontario
Posts: 845
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Before I head out, I'd like to re-iterate my initial thought and make it solid:

High compression and nitrous don't mix, especially on 93 octane pump gas.

It doesn't make sense to increase compression with added charge.
Adrenaline_Z is offline  
Old 04-12-2005, 05:14 PM
  #13  
TECH Senior Member
 
PREDATOR-Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: BFE
Posts: 14,620
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 16 Posts

Default

N2O is not boost.
What you are doing while shooting is multiplying the oxygen content of that air charge therefore allowing more fuel> bigger bang>more power, now increase CR and that releases higher energy, so even more power.
Of course forged internals are in order.
The higher the CR the better.
On stock internals, you can run 11 > 11.2:1 and a 100 shot very safely with proper tune.
PREDATOR-Z is offline  
Old 04-12-2005, 05:17 PM
  #14  
9 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (31)
 
tim99ws6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 3,175
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

I have forged rods, pistons, and a stock crank. I also have the LS6 GMPP heads with the stock(light!!!) sodium filled valves with titanium retainers. The problem is i lost all my compression with the valve reliefs in the pistons. I am setting the bottom end up for 150+ spray. I was gonna try around 11.5 compression.

Last edited by tim99ws6; 04-12-2005 at 05:24 PM.
tim99ws6 is offline  
Old 04-12-2005, 05:50 PM
  #15  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (6)
 
97M6Formula's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Lake in the Hills, IL
Posts: 1,838
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by PREDATOR-Z
N2O is not boost.
What you are doing while shooting is multiplying the oxygen content of that air charge therefore allowing more fuel> bigger bang>more power, now increase CR and that releases higher energy, so even more power.
Of course forged internals are in order.
The higher the CR the better.
On stock internals, you can run 11 > 11.2:1 and a 100 shot very safely with proper tune.
Im with this guy the greater the shot and the higher the compression the more power you make just build it and tune it right and give it the gas it needs....But just let me reiterate NITROUS LOVES COMPRESSION
97M6Formula is offline  
Old 04-12-2005, 06:17 PM
  #16  
TECH Fanatic
 
NastySSoo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Stuart Fl
Posts: 1,376
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I was told about 11;3 was about as much as you want on 93 octane.
NastySSoo is offline  
Old 04-12-2005, 06:47 PM
  #17  
TECH Resident
 
Adrenaline_Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: K-W, Ontario
Posts: 845
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Nitrous is not "boost", but it's a charge volume adder.

I highly doubt you guys are talking from experience here (Aside from NastySS).

When you add charge volume, you need to consider DCR and static CR.

You may shooting more oxygen into the chamber, but you are taking up
combustion volume. You can`t compress large charge volume with a volatile
fuel octane!

Have a read through these many links, then we can talk on a higher level.

http://www.starracing.com/nitrous_oxide_general.htm

"Generally, the higher the compression ratio, the more ignition retard, as well as higher octane fuel, is required. For more specific information talk to one of our technicians."

http://www.kb-silvolite.com/article....on=read&A_id=7

`The strongest engines have less compression ratio, less spark advance, and more nitrous.``

http://www.urbanracer.com/articles/a....asp?a=780&z=4
It's common to see nitrous oxide used to add power to drag race motors that exceed 14:1 compression. On such an application, the nitrous/fuel ratio would be even richer, like 6:1, to add additional race octane (100-plus) fuel to the combustion chamber to control the heat and temperature.

Needless to say, you don`t want to creep over 11:1 static CR with pump gas!

Last edited by Adrenaline_Z; 04-12-2005 at 06:59 PM.
Adrenaline_Z is offline  
Old 04-12-2005, 08:03 PM
  #18  
jrp
SN95 Director
iTrader: (16)
 
jrp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Valencia, Ca
Posts: 10,755
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

im sure you know my SCR is 12.02 and my DCR is 8.49. my IVC @ .050 is 51. though i havent run the motor much as im still working **** out i havent detected much detonation, im running 91 now but will throw in some 100 octain until i get everything sorted out.
jrp is offline  
Old 04-12-2005, 08:08 PM
  #19  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (6)
 
97M6Formula's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Lake in the Hills, IL
Posts: 1,838
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I wasnt saying not use a higher octane gas for it...Youd be stupid not to... What I am saying is while the STRONGEST engine may have a low cr ratio and more nitrous I guarantee the faster engine has a higher CR and dont say that i dont know anything either because you have no idea what my car runs or what it has in it
97M6Formula is offline  
Old 04-12-2005, 08:18 PM
  #20  
TECH Resident
 
Adrenaline_Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: K-W, Ontario
Posts: 845
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

What I am saying is while the STRONGEST engine may have a low cr ratio and more nitrous I guarantee the faster engine has a higher CR and dont say that i dont know anything either because you have no idea what my car runs or what it has in it
Bull.

First off, let`s stay on topic. The original post states he wants to use
pump gas, therefore, the compression must remain moderate.

The strongest engine is the engine that packs the most energy in the charge
per power stroke.

Like I stated earlier, you can compress the **** out of NOTHING and get
nothing, or you can compress a high energy charge mildly and have power.

Static CR`s are used to pad large cams with late closing intakes.

I don`t know what your motor has, but I can assure everyone it`s not a high
compression pump gas nitrous motor.

If you want to debate the physics of combustion further, be my guest. I`d
love to get into this in depth.

Last edited by Adrenaline_Z; 04-12-2005 at 08:45 PM.
Adrenaline_Z is offline  


Quick Reply: Highest compression on pump gas?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:59 AM.