Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Aluminium vs. Cast Iron Heads

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-02-2005, 01:44 AM
  #1  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
 
desTRUCKtive's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Tucson AZ
Posts: 1,089
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Aluminium vs. Cast Iron Heads

I posted this in the truck section. I am trying to find out how much better are aluminium heads., than cast iron. I am wanting to get 6.0 317 casting heads. the specs from cast iron to aluminium are the same. What is you take thanks for the any input.

https://ls1tech.com/forums/showthread.php?t=330438
Old 06-02-2005, 02:04 AM
  #2  
Banned
iTrader: (23)
 
JZ'sTA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Ft. Myers Fl
Posts: 3,126
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

They are basicially the same, just different material used.
If you are just using them stock on a truck you will be fine.
If you are porting them, using them on a boosted setup or doing pretty much anything other then stock go aluminum.
Old 06-02-2005, 03:13 AM
  #3  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (2)
 
AsianIce25's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Royal Oak, MI
Posts: 342
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

aluminum allows for better cooling and higher compression ratios. just switching to alum heads prob wont gain you too much power unless you go with a set of 5.3 heads to raise the compression a bit. expect a 3-4% power increase for every full point of compresssion increase (i.e. 10.1:1 to 11.1:1). theres really no point in doing the swap if youre gonna put the same 6L heads back on...
Old 06-02-2005, 10:32 AM
  #4  
Launching!
iTrader: (1)
 
SOM98TA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: palm harbor/tampa
Posts: 240
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

all being equal Iron heads will make more power then aluminum heads..


same octane
same compression
same timing

but the disadvantages to iron heads are.. cant run as much timing, cant run as much compression, harder to port and are 50lbs heavier..

the advantages of aluminum heads would be.. 50lbs lighter, dissapate heat better (sp?), run more timing, run more compression, easier to port.
Old 06-02-2005, 10:43 AM
  #5  
IMD
Banned
iTrader: (10)
 
IMD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Texas
Posts: 567
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by SOM98TA
all being equal Iron heads will make more power then aluminum heads..


how the hell do you figure that?

its 2005 people, i cant see any good reason to use cast iron heads for anything other than keeping the boat from drifting around the lake.
Old 06-02-2005, 10:47 AM
  #6  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
zamboxl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Sunrise Fl
Posts: 1,369
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by IMD
how the hell do you figure that?

its 2005 people, i cant see any good reason to use cast iron heads for anything other than keeping the boat from drifting around the lake.
o man tu funny
Old 06-02-2005, 10:53 AM
  #7  
Launching!
iTrader: (1)
 
SOM98TA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: palm harbor/tampa
Posts: 240
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

that is a fact, Iron heads can make power..


that was a very ignorant statement
Old 06-02-2005, 11:06 AM
  #8  
LS1 Tech Administrator
iTrader: (14)
 
Patrick G's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Victoria, TX
Posts: 8,244
Likes: 0
Received 31 Likes on 27 Posts

Default

The old iron 6.0L heads have ports that are modeled after the old LS1 ports. The 317 aluminum 6.0L heads have ports modeled after the LS6 head and therefore flow quite a bit better than the iron heads. That's the biggest reason to choose the aluminum heads. They're better to start off with.
__________________

2013 Corvette Grand Sport A6 LME forged 416, Greg Good ported TFS 255 LS3 heads, 222/242 .629"/.604" 121LSA Pat G blower cam, ARH 1 7/8" headers, ESC Novi 1500 Supercharger w/8 rib direct drive conversion, 747rwhp/709rwtq on 93 octane, 801rwhp/735rwtq on race fuel, 10.1 @ 147.25mph 1/4 mile, 174.7mph Half Mile.
2016 Corvette Z51 M7 Magnuson Heartbeat 2300 supercharger, TSP LT headers, Pat G tuned, 667rwhp, 662rwtq, 191mph TX Mile.
2009.5 Pontiac G8 GT 6.0L, A6, AFR 230v2 heads. 506rwhp/442rwtq. 11.413 @ 121.29mph 1/4 mile, 168.7mph TX Mile
2000 Pewter Ram Air Trans Am M6 heads/cam 508 rwhp/445 rwtq SAE, 183.092 TX Mile
2018 Cadillac Escalade 6.2L A10 Pat G tuned.
LS1,LS2,LS3,LS7,LT1 Custom Camshaft Specialist For custom camshaft help press here.
Custom LSX tuning in person or via email press here.
Old 06-02-2005, 11:14 AM
  #9  
Launching!
iTrader: (1)
 
SOM98TA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: palm harbor/tampa
Posts: 240
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I'm not talking about 2 specific heads against each other..


I'm talking about in general Aluminum Vs Iron.
Old 06-02-2005, 11:40 AM
  #10  
LS1 Tech Administrator
iTrader: (14)
 
Patrick G's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Victoria, TX
Posts: 8,244
Likes: 0
Received 31 Likes on 27 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by SOM98TA
I'm not talking about 2 specific heads against each other..


I'm talking about in general Aluminum Vs Iron.
While that may be true, the original question was whether specific iron heads would make more or less power than specific aluminum heads. If you don't plan on porting either and the compression is the same, the aluminum heads will be 10-15 hp better than the iron heads (mostly from the better flow). If the flow and combustion chamber were the same, the iron heads would probably have a 5 rwhp advantage due to their better heat retention. But the aluminum heads have a 15-20 rwhp advantage from a flow standpoint, giving them a net 10-15 rwhp advantage. If that's worth $400 to you, then I say go for it!
__________________

2013 Corvette Grand Sport A6 LME forged 416, Greg Good ported TFS 255 LS3 heads, 222/242 .629"/.604" 121LSA Pat G blower cam, ARH 1 7/8" headers, ESC Novi 1500 Supercharger w/8 rib direct drive conversion, 747rwhp/709rwtq on 93 octane, 801rwhp/735rwtq on race fuel, 10.1 @ 147.25mph 1/4 mile, 174.7mph Half Mile.
2016 Corvette Z51 M7 Magnuson Heartbeat 2300 supercharger, TSP LT headers, Pat G tuned, 667rwhp, 662rwtq, 191mph TX Mile.
2009.5 Pontiac G8 GT 6.0L, A6, AFR 230v2 heads. 506rwhp/442rwtq. 11.413 @ 121.29mph 1/4 mile, 168.7mph TX Mile
2000 Pewter Ram Air Trans Am M6 heads/cam 508 rwhp/445 rwtq SAE, 183.092 TX Mile
2018 Cadillac Escalade 6.2L A10 Pat G tuned.
LS1,LS2,LS3,LS7,LT1 Custom Camshaft Specialist For custom camshaft help press here.
Custom LSX tuning in person or via email press here.
Old 06-02-2005, 11:44 PM
  #11  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
 
desTRUCKtive's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Tucson AZ
Posts: 1,089
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Patrick G
The old iron 6.0L heads have ports that are modeled after the old LS1 ports. The 317 aluminum 6.0L heads have ports modeled after the LS6 head and therefore flow quite a bit better than the iron heads. That's the biggest reason to choose the aluminum heads. They're better to start off with.
I see I always had the impression that both cast iron and the aluminuim heads were exact replicas of each other. I did not know that the flow charecteristics were different. I am thinking for sure aluminium now. I am also thinking about maybe adding a little more compression.
Old 06-03-2005, 11:56 AM
  #12  
TECH Fanatic
 
Old SStroker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Upstate NY
Posts: 1,979
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by IMD

its 2005 people, i cant see any good reason to use cast iron heads for anything other than keeping the boat from drifting around the lake.


LOL here. You are right on with that at least for non-diesel!

You need to go back to why GM Powertrain used any iron heads at all in the truck version of the LSx engine.

As I understand it, the Powertrain folks wanted to use aluminum, but the "truck folks" said no because they thought iron would give better engine durability over the long haul in trucks. Powertrain had to convince them that not only were the aluminum heads as good as the iron for durability, they were better. That took some time, so some early truck LS engines had iron heads. Anyway, that's the story I got from a "Deep Throat" inside the Company.

You can decide for yourself, but the aluminum heads made a better running, better heat rejecting engine which slightly improved fuel economy due to less weight and how engine temps could be manipulated. All of this also helped durability. Didn't hurt power output and acceleration either.

Sometimes the wheels (pun intended) at large OEMs grind exceedingly slowly.
Old 06-03-2005, 01:07 PM
  #13  
TECH Enthusiast
 
BBQLS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Red Stick, LA
Posts: 659
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by SOM98TA
all being equal Iron heads will make more power then aluminum heads..


same octane
same compression
same timing

but the disadvantages to iron heads are.. cant run as much timing, cant run as much compression, harder to port and are 50lbs heavier..

the advantages of aluminum heads would be.. 50lbs lighter, dissapate heat better (sp?), run more timing, run more compression, easier to port.
I've seen tests on the same design heads from world products and the aluminum heads made more power. I would think Iron would hold heat in better and make more power. I didn't understand the results, but I would go with aluminum. Aluminum is infinitely repairable, disapates heat for more compression, lighter. No contest.



Quick Reply: Aluminium vs. Cast Iron Heads



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:28 PM.