228 / 228 - 114lsa
06-26-2005, 10:25 PM
#1
12 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 950
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
228 / 228 - 114lsa anybody got one of these? How do you like it. Jason at TSP suggested it to me for what i have below. I want something that is an everyday cam thats not too lopey.
06-27-2005, 06:12 AM
#3
On The Tree
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Bethel, CT
Posts: 176
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I got a 45 rwhp and 38 ft/lbs with it.
Really happy with it.
The only difference is the rougher idle from stock. Drives like stock until you mash it. No difference in mileage; I still get around 18 mgp driving to work.
Really happy with it.
The only difference is the rougher idle from stock. Drives like stock until you mash it. No difference in mileage; I still get around 18 mgp driving to work.
06-27-2005, 08:18 AM
#4
TECH Addict
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Honolulu HI
Posts: 2,513
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
ive got the f10 and it made pretty good power. I want to go bigger though. Its not a bad cam though. Im not sure if im pulling mine. Ive been thinking about putting the stock one back in so i can sell this one and get a bigger one.
Nino
Nino
06-27-2005, 03:55 PM
#6
On The Tree
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Bethel, CT
Posts: 176
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
They raised the idle to around 1k when they tuned it. (Eastside)
So it's louder than it was at idle.
Definately rougher idle than stock though.
Sounds GOOOD to me. Really deep sound now.
I compared the dyno before and after and I didn't lose a thing down low.
The h.p. curve is flat as a pancake right up to the 6500 shift point.
I'd buy it again.
So it's louder than it was at idle.
Definately rougher idle than stock though.
Sounds GOOOD to me. Really deep sound now.
I compared the dyno before and after and I didn't lose a thing down low.
The h.p. curve is flat as a pancake right up to the 6500 shift point.
I'd buy it again.
Trending Topics
06-28-2005, 07:41 AM
#11
TECH Addict
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Honolulu HI
Posts: 2,513
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
then set the idle to 950 and you shouldnt have much lope. the exhaust has alot to do with it too 
my new setup consists of Pacesetters, tsp catted y and the stock muffler. Its so quiet. Great sleeper.
my new setup consists of Pacesetters, tsp catted y and the stock muffler. Its so quiet. Great sleeper.
06-28-2005, 08:09 PM
#13
12 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 950
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by chaos
My old set exhuast was a SLP dual dual (which is one of the quietest systems) and you could still hear the cam lope. Is there much of a difference in sound between the 114s and 112s?
06-30-2005, 07:05 PM
#14
TECH Enthusiast
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Chattanooga,TN
Posts: 736
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'm in the process of putting that exact cam in with some S2 heads. It should be buttomed up by tomorrow and its going to the dyno on Saturday. I'm putting down 343/357 now so hope to put down 400 or better after the install.
07-22-2005, 04:13 PM
#15
TECH Enthusiast
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Chattanooga,TN
Posts: 736
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by PonchoFan
I got a 45 rwhp and 38 ft/lbs with it.
Really happy with it.
The only difference is the rougher idle from stock. Drives like stock until you mash it. No difference in mileage; I still get around 18 mgp driving to work.
Really happy with it.
The only difference is the rougher idle from stock. Drives like stock until you mash it. No difference in mileage; I still get around 18 mgp driving to work.