PCM Diagnostics & Tuning HP Tuners | Holley | Diablo
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

what the hell, new and "better" o2s oscillate like crap

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-23-2005, 01:03 PM
  #1  
TECH Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (33)
 
WS6FirebirdTA00's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 8,318
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default what the hell, new and "better" o2s oscillate like crap

i got some densos and went for a ride and my damn stockers went back and forth better then these damn things did. i dont get it, if someone can explain please do. only thing i can think of is the proportional fuel needs to be dropped, they oscillate but very slowly, they arent nearly as nuts as my stockers were.
Old 07-24-2005, 09:39 PM
  #2  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (7)
 
slow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Orlando
Posts: 6,151
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

log just the o2 sensor and see how they do.

With my new Bosch I noticed what appeared to be very lazy sensors, but after logging just the o2's I noticed they were switching faster than before, just faster than my datalogger would show when logging 24 pids.

I am just to spoiled with fast datalogging from my work on ford vehicles, 20 values, 60 frames a second.

Ryan
Old 07-24-2005, 11:16 PM
  #3  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (36)
 
Black02SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Kokomo, IN
Posts: 3,291
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by slow
I am just to spoiled with fast datalogging from my work on ford vehicles, 20 values, 60 frames a second.

Ryan
Damn, wouldn't that be the ****.
Old 07-25-2005, 01:21 AM
  #4  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
SmokingWS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: St. Louis MO
Posts: 1,795
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Default

60fps? I could only wish. Nothing beats the 6 to 8 fps my 98 pcm pumps out

I'm not sure about the denso but technically the Bosch vette rear is suppose to be the new and "better" sensor. I don't think mine switch any faster than my stockers, but at idle and cold conditions they don't stop switching.
Old 07-25-2005, 05:16 AM
  #5  
TECH Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (33)
 
WS6FirebirdTA00's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 8,318
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

ok ill give that a shot, these are the vette rears, i played with the prop fuel and its getting better
Old 07-25-2005, 07:38 AM
  #6  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (11)
 
Billiumss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Erie, PA
Posts: 2,975
Received 14 Likes on 10 Posts

Default

I was tuning a 2001 Camaro SS yesterday with a big cam and he was getting "Insufficent Switching" codes from his "new" rear C5 O2's

When the codes set, he stayed in cell 22 when cruisng around, clear the codes and everything went back to normal.

What tables are the Prop fuel and what way do you go to adjust them?

I'm currently part throttle tuning a 427 C5 with a 248 252 112lsa cam and I don't have any O2 problems and it switches just fine.
Old 07-25-2005, 07:58 AM
  #7  
TECH Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (33)
 
WS6FirebirdTA00's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 8,318
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

prop fuel is in the closed/open loop section. with bigger injectors these values have to be smaller, or should be at least. the better o2s seem to need less of a fuel shot to oscillate so i had to decrease the numbers more. i have seen a slight improvement but the true test will be actually driving around to see waht they do. hopefully i can play with this to get it right.
Old 07-25-2005, 08:00 AM
  #8  
Kleeborp the Moderator™
iTrader: (11)
 
MeentSS02's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Dayton, OH
Posts: 10,317
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Oh good lord I just LOVE headers Hopefully you get this all worked out...
Old 07-25-2005, 08:12 AM
  #9  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (28)
 
TAQuickness's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Houston
Posts: 3,250
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by WS6FirebirdTA00
with bigger injectors these values have to be smaller, or should be at least.
Just digging for some additional info on this, but, if your IFR table is scaled correctly for the larger injectors, and your VE table is dialed in correctly, why would you need to adjust this table?
Old 07-25-2005, 09:12 AM
  #10  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (30)
 
12secSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 3,690
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by WS6FirebirdTA00
i got some densos and went for a ride and my damn stockers went back and forth better then these damn things did. i dont get it, if someone can explain please do. only thing i can think of is the proportional fuel needs to be dropped, they oscillate but very slowly, they arent nearly as nuts as my stockers were.
I just put in a pair of Denso O2s in our 2001 Camaro SS. Finally replaced the 132K mile OEM. While in idle and warm up, the Denso do oscillate slow, but once we were moving, they were consistantly oscillating very rapidly. We no longer have insufficient switching that the old O2 had. The fuel trims are much better as well. Glad I bought mine, this car needed them.
Old 07-25-2005, 11:44 AM
  #11  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
SmokingWS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: St. Louis MO
Posts: 1,795
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Flame Throwing SS
I just put in a pair of Denso O2s in our 2001 Camaro SS. Finally replaced the 132K mile OEM. While in idle and warm up, the Denso do oscillate slow, but once we were moving, they were consistantly oscillating very rapidly. We no longer have insufficient switching that the old O2 had. The fuel trims are much better as well. Glad I bought mine, this car needed them.
Best part is they'll oscillate enough while starting and stopping in the staging lanes to keep the LTFT's from falsely going positive, which in turns keeps the trims at 0 during WOT




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:38 PM.