Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:
View Poll Results: Which method do you prefer for High Compression and why?
Flat top pistons and puny chambers (55cc or smaller)?
25
65.79%
Domed Pistons and "normal" chambers (55cc and larger)?
9
23.68%
Other, please list...
4
10.53%
Voters: 38. You may not vote on this poll

Preferred method for high compression?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-26-2005, 01:04 PM
  #1  
Restricted User
Thread Starter
iTrader: (9)
 
CAT3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Sierra Vista, AZ
Posts: 7,603
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Preferred method for high compression?

Flat tops with small chambers?

Domed Pistons with normal chambers?

Say for a custom nitrous fed beast pushing 300-400shots? I know either way the ringlands need to be spec'd and ring packs, but looking at good clean flame propagation vs. heat soaking issues vs longevity etc. Not to expect the engine to be a Daily Driver either, so a freshing up seasonally would be in line.

Charlie
Old 08-26-2005, 01:09 PM
  #2  
LS1 Tech Administrator
iTrader: (14)
 
Patrick G's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Victoria, TX
Posts: 8,244
Likes: 0
Received 31 Likes on 27 Posts

Default

All the best performing engines seem to favor the combustion process happening as close to the center of the cylinder as possible. Because of this, the trend is small combustion chambers and flat or dished pistons. Domed pistons tend to squish the combustion away from the center and away from the spark plug...not good for nitrous or for N/A performance.
__________________

2013 Corvette Grand Sport A6 LME forged 416, Greg Good ported TFS 255 LS3 heads, 222/242 .629"/.604" 121LSA Pat G blower cam, ARH 1 7/8" headers, ESC Novi 1500 Supercharger w/8 rib direct drive conversion, 747rwhp/709rwtq on 93 octane, 801rwhp/735rwtq on race fuel, 10.1 @ 147.25mph 1/4 mile, 174.7mph Half Mile.
2016 Corvette Z51 M7 Magnuson Heartbeat 2300 supercharger, TSP LT headers, Pat G tuned, 667rwhp, 662rwtq, 191mph TX Mile.
2009.5 Pontiac G8 GT 6.0L, A6, AFR 230v2 heads. 506rwhp/442rwtq. 11.413 @ 121.29mph 1/4 mile, 168.7mph TX Mile
2000 Pewter Ram Air Trans Am M6 heads/cam 508 rwhp/445 rwtq SAE, 183.092 TX Mile
2018 Cadillac Escalade 6.2L A10 Pat G tuned.
LS1,LS2,LS3,LS7,LT1 Custom Camshaft Specialist For custom camshaft help press here.
Custom LSX tuning in person or via email press here.
Old 08-26-2005, 03:25 PM
  #3  
Restricted User
Thread Starter
iTrader: (9)
 
CAT3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Sierra Vista, AZ
Posts: 7,603
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I have heard the same but then thought I read where designs have changed and have the dome with the flame centering thus keeping temps distributed evenly.
Old 08-26-2005, 04:49 PM
  #4  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (10)
 
MUSTANGEATER's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Belleville, IL
Posts: 1,237
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Small Chambers and Flat Tops are the best way IMHO. A small dome just to even out what you lose with the valve reliefs would be fine. It's kind of hard to do it with any of the stock LSX castings unless you weld and port and weld and port which can be $$$. The furthest I've heard a LSX factory casting being angle milled is to 51 CC's.

What Head Casting are you using? What amount of SCR do you want?
Old 08-26-2005, 10:13 PM
  #5  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (21)
 
Beast96Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Shreveport, LA
Posts: 4,049
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Small chambers and a flat top or effective dish will be the best. Smaller chambers also flow a bit better, at least in the case of the heads I'm getting, but I guess that really just depends on the design of the head you use.
Old 08-26-2005, 10:18 PM
  #6  
jrp
SN95 Director
iTrader: (16)
 
jrp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Valencia, Ca
Posts: 10,755
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

i used small domes (6.6) and some milling (.020) for a 64.7cc chamber.

http://www.ls1camaro.net/freehosting/piston-1.jpg
http://www.ls1camaro.net/freehosting/piston2.jpg

12.03 SCR
Old 08-26-2005, 10:30 PM
  #7  
Banned
iTrader: (23)
 
JZ'sTA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Ft. Myers Fl
Posts: 3,126
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

I feel the flat top and a smaller chamber is better.
JRP's setup will work and the pistion isn't the huge of a dish.
However a flat top and 55 or less cc head will get my vote.
Check out ET performances new heads. They are made to order.
You can get a 50cc head very easily with them for no extra.
Might be a great idea for what your doing.
Attached is a pic of a domed piston similar to what JRP is running. +6cc's.
Attached Thumbnails Preferred method for high compression?-dsc00612.jpg   Preferred method for high compression?-dsc00613.jpg   Preferred method for high compression?-dsc00617.jpg  
Old 08-26-2005, 11:53 PM
  #8  
Restricted User
Thread Starter
iTrader: (9)
 
CAT3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Sierra Vista, AZ
Posts: 7,603
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Oh yes, I am and have been looking at ETP's new 11* heads Well, guess I'll go with smaller chambers now.
Old 08-28-2005, 05:15 PM
  #9  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (34)
 
SS1875's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Ft. Wayne, Indiana
Posts: 3,158
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Dish with valve reliefs and 59cc chambers seems to have done well for me.
Old 08-28-2005, 05:50 PM
  #10  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (14)
 
DAPSUPRSLO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Salisbury,MD
Posts: 1,729
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally I voted for other which would be a dish with small small combustion chambers to keep the majority of the combustion happening in the center of the cylinder to avoid detonation. However, I think the thickness of the piston becomes a very big issue with this kind of hit of nitrous. That being said I guess I would still favor a smallish chamber with a small dish in the piston. Helps keep detonation away and maintains the proper thickness of the piston.

When it comes to n/a performance one need only look at what almost everyone in Engine Masters does, small small combustion chamber with large dish in the piston. Could be an issue for nitrous though because of thickness in the top of the piston.
Old 08-28-2005, 06:07 PM
  #11  
Restricted User
Thread Starter
iTrader: (9)
 
CAT3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Sierra Vista, AZ
Posts: 7,603
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Well, a few differences now I see. I looked at Diamonds and JE tech info on nitrous pistons, seem to be majority of flat tops, of course these are only ratings up to 300shots., but not sure how compression would effect that, as in:

10:1 SCR with 300shot compared to 12.8:1SCR with 300shot. IIRC my pistons were quoted as being 12:1 capable and 300shots? Might have to get the PN off them and find out from Diamond.
Before ordering the heads, I have to know so I can get <55cc chambers or stick with 55> chambers. Looking now at 52cc for 12.75:1 with current .040" Cometics, -.007deck, 2cc vr pistons. Kind of high for some ppl but I think with the tuning and remaining parts I'll manage nicely. Might go lower, and build a more bullet-proof bottom for all out nitrous use. So many choices.
Old 08-28-2005, 06:20 PM
  #12  
Banned
iTrader: (23)
 
JZ'sTA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Ft. Myers Fl
Posts: 3,126
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

A few things I see.
1. you are doing a new bottom end. Your piston height will more then likely be different then the avarage -.007 we use when figuring out compression.
Make sure you find out the new piston deck height as well when figuring compression.

2. Why go 12.8 vs 12:1 compression?
IMO the difference will be almost 0 unless you run a higher octane fuel to help with the added compression. That is just my oponion. Also with compression that high a new started is in you near future as your stocker is going to hate that much compression. I am just tossing out a oponion here.
I myself would order either a flat top or something like a 6cc dish and run a smaller chamber head to make the compression.
Both way will work and work well. I think the bigger issue is making sure you get the best rings for that much spray and some nice coating on the pistons.
Old 08-28-2005, 06:25 PM
  #13  
Restricted User
Thread Starter
iTrader: (9)
 
CAT3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Sierra Vista, AZ
Posts: 7,603
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I verified the deck height, and its there -.007. I thought about the starter vs. compression but forgot to think it through thanks for the reminder. If going higher, I fully intend on running higher octane, and getting the "most" out of the package on race nights We'll see.
Old 09-05-2005, 01:35 PM
  #14  
TECH Resident
 
racecar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Portland Oregon
Posts: 875
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Looks like the majority here is small chambers. The problem with that is the more that you mill, the thinner the head surface, more possibility of a crack. If you mill too much, the heads sit lower and the intake bolts and ports don't line up. Maybe that is not a problem on LS motors?? I like big domes, and deep pockets for valves. If you have ever had a valve hit a piston due to a weak spring, you know what a disaster that is. Big domes, heads not milled, everything bolts up fine. What I am reading here is that there are performance gains with the small chamber..
Attached Thumbnails Preferred method for high compression?-850.jpg  
Old 09-05-2005, 04:39 PM
  #15  
Restricted User
Thread Starter
iTrader: (9)
 
CAT3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Sierra Vista, AZ
Posts: 7,603
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

racecar, with the newer aftermarket casting heads the deck is thicker to allow for custom milling and no loss of integrity.
I have heard arguements from both sides, dome is better and chamber is. I am looking for a street/strip, reliable higher compression, low quench height for a cleaner burn w/ less detonation etc... With that in mind, and I already have a forged bottom, I am looking for ETP 11* to spec chambers for desired SCR. Now all I have to do is make up my mind on how I want to go.

Charlie
Old 09-05-2005, 05:05 PM
  #16  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
gollum's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,467
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 8 Posts

Default

Equal heat distribution and transfer is a very important part of piston design. A flat top, a flat top with four valve reliefs (427 LS7 version), pop ups, or any dish or reverse dome types are good as long as the dish or pop up is centrally located for a more even heat transfer across top and through piston.

Last edited by gollum; 09-05-2005 at 05:25 PM.
Old 09-06-2005, 06:22 AM
  #17  
On The Tree
iTrader: (2)
 
roadrash9r's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: FORT WALTON BEACH
Posts: 108
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

If you dont want to mill and you want to use the stock pistons go with a thinner gasket. Commetic makes all kinds. My stock heads are 64cc with 10.5-1 and my afrs are 66cc with the .040 cometic it comes out to 10.8-1 with no milling and stock internals.
Old 09-06-2005, 03:22 PM
  #18  
TECH Veteran
 
robertbartsch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Hartsdale, NY
Posts: 4,055
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I have early SDPC ported heads. The porting was done by Lingenfelter. ...anyway, the LS6 castings are milled .055!!!!!! I guess the static compression is over 11 to 1.

No real issues with alignment of the head bolts, manifold, etc.
Old 09-07-2005, 09:12 AM
  #19  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
Cstraub's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Tri-Cities, TN
Posts: 1,378
Likes: 0
Received 27 Likes on 14 Posts

Default

Tiny combustion chamber with reversed dome allowing better atomization of air and fuel.

Chris




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:53 PM.