Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

tr224/110

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-28-2005, 02:31 PM
  #1  
Launching!
Thread Starter
iTrader: (27)
 
slow98Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 245
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default tr224/110

where would a tr224 on a 110lsa make peak power and what would be the peak power estimates on a full boltons auto car
Old 08-28-2005, 02:37 PM
  #2  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (6)
 
2001CamaroGuy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Phoenix, AZ USA
Posts: 4,766
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

probably about 6000 rpm depending on the advance....it will be a stronger, narrower peak.......

you could see high 300s rwhp..... (I'm assuming you have long tube headers)......would be a cool cam (for a manual) but you will need a stall for it.......114lsa is much better for auto cars.....
Old 08-28-2005, 03:08 PM
  #3  
Launching!
Thread Starter
iTrader: (27)
 
slow98Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 245
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

i have a tci sf3000
Old 08-28-2005, 03:09 PM
  #4  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (6)
 
2001CamaroGuy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Phoenix, AZ USA
Posts: 4,766
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

then you should be ok.......you will just need to idle higher than a stock vert. could deal with (you would be on the brakes hard all the time)....
Old 08-28-2005, 03:16 PM
  #5  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (14)
 
DAPSUPRSLO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Salisbury,MD
Posts: 1,729
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

The cam you speak of is a torque monster to the max. I used to have it in a m6 and have my old dyno graph but it's on my computer in the office. You need a reall good exhaust system for this cam to shine. Made 380rwtq by 3000rpm with stock heads in my 01 ss and 405rwhp/406rwtq peak. Peaks around 5800-5900rpm with a 106 icl (4 degrees advance). Plus, mine was on lazy comp xe lobes. Put this cam on an xe-r lobe or equivalent agressive lobe and it should rpm better. You could also add 1.8 rockers to the xe lobe for the same effect. Any questions you have I should be able to answer about this cam, put about 15000 miles on mine.
Old 08-28-2005, 04:12 PM
  #6  
TECH Regular
iTrader: (5)
 
S1LV3R's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 433
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by DAPSUPRSLO
The cam you speak of is a torque monster to the max. I used to have it in a m6 and have my old dyno graph but it's on my computer in the office. You need a reall good exhaust system for this cam to shine. Made 380rwtq by 3000rpm with stock heads in my 01 ss and 405rwhp/406rwtq peak. Peaks around 5800-5900rpm with a 106 icl (4 degrees advance). Plus, mine was on lazy comp xe lobes. Put this cam on an xe-r lobe or equivalent agressive lobe and it should rpm better. You could also add 1.8 rockers to the xe lobe for the same effect. Any questions you have I should be able to answer about this cam, put about 15000 miles on mine.
With the tight LSA, did this cam have a nasty idle? Nasty meaning good with a good chop to it.
Old 08-28-2005, 04:22 PM
  #7  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (6)
 
2001CamaroGuy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Phoenix, AZ USA
Posts: 4,766
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by S1LV3R
With the tight LSA, did this cam have a nasty idle? Nasty meaning good with a good chop to it.

it will have a decent lope to it.....it's still not going to be "ProStock" by any means.....it's just not big enough (enough overlap).......but yes....it will sound like a cam
Old 08-28-2005, 05:22 PM
  #8  
Launching!
Thread Starter
iTrader: (27)
 
slow98Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 245
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by DAPSUPRSLO
The cam you speak of is a torque monster to the max. I used to have it in a m6 and have my old dyno graph but it's on my computer in the office. You need a reall good exhaust system for this cam to shine. Made 380rwtq by 3000rpm with stock heads in my 01 ss and 405rwhp/406rwtq peak. Peaks around 5800-5900rpm with a 106 icl (4 degrees advance). Plus, mine was on lazy comp xe lobes. Put this cam on an xe-r lobe or equivalent agressive lobe and it should rpm better. You could also add 1.8 rockers to the xe lobe for the same effect. Any questions you have I should be able to answer about this cam, put about 15000 miles on mine.
this cam sounds like what im looking for how was drivability and gas mileage iwould like to see the dyno sheet

Last edited by slow98Z; 08-28-2005 at 05:26 PM. Reason: forgot something
Old 08-28-2005, 05:45 PM
  #9  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (14)
 
DAPSUPRSLO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Salisbury,MD
Posts: 1,729
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Cam had a good chop to it. Keep in mind the cam I switched to from this one was a 230/237 107lsa, 107icl cam which had a little more chop to say the least.

I'll make sure to post that dyno up for you guys. Driveability was very good with this cam. Any good tuner can help you out. Keep in mind guys, this cam has hardly no overlap compared to others out there.

Like I said though, if you were going to try this cam I would use the same duration numbers at .050" but use a more agressive lobe or 1.8 rockers with the xe lobe.
Old 08-28-2005, 05:55 PM
  #10  
jrp
SN95 Director
iTrader: (16)
 
jrp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Valencia, Ca
Posts: 10,755
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by DAPSUPRSLO
Cam had a good chop to it. Keep in mind the cam I switched to from this one was a 230/237 107lsa, 107icl cam which had a little more chop to say the least.

I'll make sure to post that dyno up for you guys. Driveability was very good with this cam. Any good tuner can help you out. Keep in mind guys, this cam has hardly no overlap compared to others out there.

Like I said though, if you were going to try this cam I would use the same duration numbers at .050" but use a more agressive lobe or 1.8 rockers with the xe lobe.
https://ls1tech.com/forums/attachmen...chmentid=39016
Old 08-28-2005, 05:56 PM
  #11  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (14)
 
DAPSUPRSLO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Salisbury,MD
Posts: 1,729
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default


There she blow. Thanks!
Old 08-28-2005, 07:31 PM
  #12  
TECH Regular
iTrader: (5)
 
S1LV3R's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 433
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

[QUOTE=DAPSUPRSLO] You need a reall good exhaust system for this cam to shine. QUOTE]

What kind of exhaust did you have? How does this thing make so much torque? I thought the tighter LSA would make for a peaky engine?

Larry
Old 08-28-2005, 07:46 PM
  #13  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Ragtop 99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Bethesda, MD
Posts: 9,491
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Be cool to play with that on an adjustible chain. I'd like to see that on 108 or 110 ICL.

DAP's right about the overlap. When you think about people running a 230/232 112 cam as pretty popular, that's roughly 7* at .05. You could run a 224/224 109 cam and have 6* overlap. Run it straight up or on a 108 ICL and I bet you would see excellent torque at 3500 and peak no higher than 6200.
Old 08-28-2005, 08:07 PM
  #14  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (14)
 
DAPSUPRSLO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Salisbury,MD
Posts: 1,729
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

When I dynoe'd my exhaust consisted of the remains of a very very terrible y-pipe, a u-pipe if you will. What I mean is that I cut the y-pipe up and just ran the pieces that connected to the header with no mufflers open. Essentially open headers (hooker long tubes at the time), with extensions though to avoid the outside air getting in and skewing the oxygen sensors. The Y was a very very bad piece though, a local exhaust shop did it and did a terrible job. At the collector the pipe had literally about 30% of it blocked off by welding slag where the pipe joined to the flange.

The key to this cam's excellent torque is that I had a good exhaust setup with a fairly late opening of the exhaust valve. This I believe will allow the power stroke to be fully realized by not opening the exhaust valve early and relieving the mechanical force of the power stroke. However, late opening of the exhaust valve can contribute to blow down loss (the cylinder having to literally force the exhaust out of the exhaust valve) if the exhaust system is not up to par. I truly think what held this cam back in the higher rpm range was the early intake valve closing point of this cam. Would be interesting to see what a cam with a 230 intake lobe, same exhaust lobe, on a 106 icl with a 110 lsa would do, with a very good exhaust system ofcourse.

If you decide to run this cam do it with true duals or a very good y-setup (flowmaster collector). Opening the exhaust valve later is great for torque but with out the proper exhaust can really hurt high rpm power.
Old 08-28-2005, 10:50 PM
  #15  
Launching!
Thread Starter
iTrader: (27)
 
slow98Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 245
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

i have mac mid lengh headers a custum 2.5 to 3.5 y pipe and a mufflex 3.5 system with a spintech muffler and a cut out
Old 08-29-2005, 04:59 AM
  #16  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (2)
 
nuzee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Hawaii
Posts: 618
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I find it odd that the sponsors don't market more of the shorter duration, tighter lsa cams like a 218-220 dur, 108-110 lsa. Although they may not dyno as high as the larger duration cams, they will make great street/strip cams, strong mid range, and have the rump-rump lope that many folks desire. I guess peak dyno numbers sells cams. Too bad track numbers don't carry the same weight as dyno numbers to the newbies.
Old 08-29-2005, 08:02 AM
  #17  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (2)
 
equandt's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Wish-consin
Posts: 756
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by nuzee
I find it odd that the sponsors don't market more of the shorter duration, tighter lsa cams like a 218-220 dur, 108-110 lsa. Although they may not dyno as high as the larger duration cams, they will make great street/strip cams, strong mid range, and have the rump-rump lope that many folks desire. I guess peak dyno numbers sells cams. Too bad track numbers don't carry the same weight as dyno numbers to the newbies.
It's hard to sell "area under the curve". Unfortunately 415HP sells a lot better. 108-110 lsa cams are a blast to drive on the street. Knowing what I do now, I wish my TR220 was on a 109 lsa.
Old 08-29-2005, 12:23 PM
  #18  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (6)
 
hourang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Commerce Twp, MI
Posts: 1,516
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

i have a custom 224/224 comp grind on a 111lsa and i LOVE the lope, sounds just like the big cams. its a very streetable cam, ran it for a while with no tune and no problems, once tuned there is no idle surge or anything. the cam peaks around 6k. great street cam.
Old 08-29-2005, 06:31 PM
  #19  
Launching!
Thread Starter
iTrader: (27)
 
slow98Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 245
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

what kind of track improvements could i see car runs 11.90 113mph now
Old 08-30-2005, 08:00 AM
  #20  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Ragtop 99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Bethesda, MD
Posts: 9,491
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Should drop you down to 11.60 and bump your mph to 116. You might do a little better ET wise if you have tire to hold it at launch.

Nice time for a bolt-on 98. If you have a big stall, I'd put it in on 108 ICL and let it peak a little higher



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:49 PM.