Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Ls1 6.0L Iron block

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-03-2005, 09:47 AM
  #1  
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
Rothman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Hahira, GA
Posts: 399
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default Ls1 6.0L Iron block

Just wondering which parts from an LS-1 will not fit on the 6.0L block. Or will everything fit? Also if anyone knows how to figure the displacement between cylinder size and stroke it would be much appreciated.
Old 09-03-2005, 10:04 AM
  #2  
11 & 7 Second Clubs
 
Race Car Driver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Motorhome, Freeways, Truckstops, Pits
Posts: 1,299
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Don't switch to an iron block unless you're adding 400-500 hp.
Old 09-03-2005, 10:16 AM
  #3  
TECH Junkie
 
Ben R's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Fort Collins, CO
Posts: 3,726
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Formula for Displacement:

bore x bore x stroke x number of cylinders x .7854 = Cubic Inch Displacement

If you use a 6.0L block you will have to drill and tap a hole for the alternator bracket. It's pretty straight forward.
Old 09-03-2005, 12:06 PM
  #4  
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
Rothman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Hahira, GA
Posts: 399
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

by adding 400-500 hp do you mean on top of the baseline or total hp?
Old 09-03-2005, 12:12 PM
  #5  
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
Rothman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Hahira, GA
Posts: 399
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Also, why not the Iron block? From what I've read it's only around 80 lbs heavier, and If I go with a 427 heads cam N\A combo it should be bad ***.
Old 09-03-2005, 01:10 PM
  #6  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
strokedls1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Venice, Ca
Posts: 1,829
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

It adds about 100 lbs. He is talking about making that much power rear wheel total. If you go big displacement it is worth.
Old 09-03-2005, 04:26 PM
  #7  
jrp
SN95 Director
iTrader: (16)
 
jrp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Valencia, Ca
Posts: 10,755
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

to go 427 with the 6.0 block you'd need a 4.060 bore and 4.125 stroke. if you want 427 displacement i'd opt for the darton drysleeved ls2 or if you have the money go wet sleeve. the larger bore 4.125 will unshroud the valves and allow the heads to breath better. add the 4" stroke and your good to go.

otherwise i'd stick with a 408 using the iron block; 4.030 x 4.00
Old 09-04-2005, 04:28 PM
  #8  
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
Rothman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Hahira, GA
Posts: 399
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I hear nothing but horror stories about these re-sleeved engines. I know the ones that work, work great but the percentages of ones that seem to be failing are to substantial to ignore. That's why I was thinking about the iron block. Well, that and the fact that their dirt cheap. Is ther any other reason besides weight to avoid the iron block?
Old 09-04-2005, 07:40 PM
  #9  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (14)
 
ArcticZ28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Alexandria, VA
Posts: 5,125
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Rothman
I hear nothing but horror stories about these re-sleeved engines. I know the ones that work, work great but the percentages of ones that seem to be failing are to substantial to ignore. That's why I was thinking about the iron block. Well, that and the fact that their dirt cheap. Is ther any other reason besides weight to avoid the iron block?
Nope. The iron block is 65 pounds heavier, it's in the GM LS1/LS6 Performance book. I've always heard 80-100, but I just read that.
Old 09-04-2005, 07:42 PM
  #10  
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
Rothman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Hahira, GA
Posts: 399
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Yeah I have the same book and read the same thing but wasn't sure what to beleive since I've heard so many things.
Old 09-04-2005, 10:14 PM
  #11  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
strokedls1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Venice, Ca
Posts: 1,829
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I have had both blocks and the difference is about 100 lbs. I have weighed the blocks. You could also look at the ls2 block if you don't want the weight penalty. I agree that the resleeve leave a lot to be desired in terms of leaking coolant.
Old 09-04-2005, 11:58 PM
  #12  
FormerVendor
iTrader: (32)
 
dragonZ28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Lexington, KY
Posts: 3,654
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I picked up the iron and aluminum shortblocks by hand, and the difference is much more than 60lbs.
Old 09-05-2005, 01:26 AM
  #13  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (14)
 
ArcticZ28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Alexandria, VA
Posts: 5,125
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

It definitely feels like it, I just find it hard to disagree with written (supposed) facts in a book. But if strokedls1 says he weighed it, I believe it. That MF'ers def much heavier and I also speak from experience.




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:30 AM.