Victor JR Pics and specs..
09-13-2005, 12:54 PM
#1
Victor JR Pics and specs.. I don't normally double post but I thought that this might be more of use here than the external section. I don't see many carbed LS1's running around. I also feel most everyone in here have probably been through the external bolt on section several times and may not read it very often. The people in this section are also more likely in my book to cut things up 
Start out with some pics shall we?
On to some specs for you technical guys
There are a total of 4 runner lengths.
Shortest (inner 4) 4 1/2 inches long
The one with the tapped bung is 6 1/2 inches and so is the one diagnal from it.
The other 2 are 6 inches
The runer height loks to be 2 5/8 inches but this is excluding the injector area. Very eyeballed. The width is 15/16 inch.
The inside of the runners are rough like a stock head casting. I probably wont port it at this time but I might at a later date.
Start out with some pics shall we?
On to some specs for you technical guys
There are a total of 4 runner lengths.
Shortest (inner 4) 4 1/2 inches long
The one with the tapped bung is 6 1/2 inches and so is the one diagnal from it.
The other 2 are 6 inches
The runer height loks to be 2 5/8 inches but this is excluding the injector area. Very eyeballed. The width is 15/16 inch.
The inside of the runners are rough like a stock head casting. I probably wont port it at this time but I might at a later date.
09-13-2005, 01:21 PM
#3
when did you order and when did you receive it? I'm looking to order it as well, but right now everything says backordered through 25th of this month!! where's your source
my local performance shop has one of the drilled intakes w/o the rails and everything in their warehouse.
my local performance shop has one of the drilled intakes w/o the rails and everything in their warehouse.
09-13-2005, 01:45 PM
#5
Total height is 5 1/2 inches sitting flat to the carb flange.
Yes this is the predrilled version and it retails for aprox $320
I ordered it begining of September and was told 9/15 shipdate.. Not complaining.
Not sure exactly what the holes are for yet, but I'm sure one is MAP, maybe AIT??
Yes this is the predrilled version and it retails for aprox $320
I ordered it begining of September and was told 9/15 shipdate.. Not complaining.
Not sure exactly what the holes are for yet, but I'm sure one is MAP, maybe AIT??
Trending Topics
09-13-2005, 03:24 PM
#12
Originally Posted by smokinHawk
do you know what elbow and throttle body you are going with yet?
your 73 is going to be sweet! how soon to you get pictures of the turbo mounted?
your 73 is going to be sweet! how soon to you get pictures of the turbo mounted?
smokin-check out 69firebird thread he had his elbo made from a guy. i have spoken with him he offers a very fair price!
his name is aaron shoot him an email he responds back very quickly
here is his e-mail addy, if you want to get ahold of him.
aaron_460@hotmail.com
https://ls1tech.com/forums/forced-induction/369074-look-whats-going-car-tomorrow.html
09-13-2005, 04:45 PM
#17
there was a artical in popular hottrodding about a ls1 build up 1000+ HP and they comparied the fast intake to the intake you all are taking about and said it mabe about the same HP but the fast made more low end torque . what do you think about that?
09-13-2005, 05:04 PM
#19
SSU Moderator
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 4,857
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
That was an extrude honed GMPP intake on a low comp 402 with a HP turbo "kit" with a PT96 or something. They were not specific on anything...I thought it was a shitty article more concerned with the theories behind adding forced induction and what positive pressure does to the HP numbers and efficicency (i.e. 14.7lbs of boost = 2x the horsepower of the NA motor...etc.) than how to build a GOOD motor/turbo combo. They used Greddy wastegates (two), a kit that will never fit in anything (from what I can see), out of the box engine stuff, and a weird fuel system (single aero pump, HUGE injectors and a TON of fuel pressure).
EDIT--oh yeah, I don't think they got the motor above 6800-7000rpm...if they got it that high.
I am going by memory only.
EDIT--oh yeah, I don't think they got the motor above 6800-7000rpm...if they got it that high.
I am going by memory only.
09-13-2005, 07:12 PM
#20
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: SW Iowa
Posts: 1,016
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I will have to dig that article up. I agree, it was pretty shitty, and as usual, very little actual tech. About the only thing that magazine seems to care about is spending lots of money on BLING. Sorry, not really digging the over-used g-Machine moniker.