Automatic Transmission 2-Speed thru 10-Speed GM Autos | Converters | Shift Kits
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:
View Poll Results: Which STR with my 2.73's
2.2
7
33.33%
2.5
5
23.81%
2.8
4
19.05%
other
5
23.81%
Voters: 21. You may not vote on this poll

Fuddle STR?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-05-2005, 03:58 PM
  #1  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
 
DeViOuSwOn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 115
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Fuddle STR?

Well the mods I have are in my sig... Will have a tire soon but am still trying to decide on a str. I have 2.73's and will not be changing it. My original plan was to go with a 2.5. Few guys who have 2.73's have been telling me to go with a 2.8. Fuddle has told me to go with a 2.2(seems kinda low considering my gay *** gear size)

What do you guys think?
Old 10-05-2005, 05:00 PM
  #2  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (4)
 
s346k's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: johnson co.
Posts: 3,433
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

you are aware of what the str means, right? a higher str will hit harder, making traction harder to get. with your gears i wouldn't go any higher than 2.5. not to mention that your tranny won't like any str over stock without torque management.
Old 10-05-2005, 05:59 PM
  #3  
11 Second Club
 
ponyeater01LS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Camp Lejeune, NC
Posts: 332
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

i ha fuddle 3600 2.2 i need a tune though 60 ft times went from 2.02 to a 1.80. 1/4 time was stock 12.91 after stall was 13.10 best after tune i should be mid to low 12s
Old 10-05-2005, 06:46 PM
  #4  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
 
DeViOuSwOn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 115
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

So you guys would say the 2.5 MAX?
Old 10-05-2005, 09:27 PM
  #5  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (20)
 
DevonsZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: J.C.
Posts: 575
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I went with the 2.2 and have 3.23's and thats seems to hit good so I would guess a 2.5 would be good for your 2.73's.
Old 10-06-2005, 09:30 AM
  #6  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
gator's 99TA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Tampa Bay
Posts: 9,971
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

you cant just "ask" for more str. str is a ratio or a rating. whatever combination you need rpm flash wise is most important. the str is determined by the combination of convertor size and flash rpm desire at the expense of efficiency. you fellas are confusing the tech aspect of the stall converter. if you want a hard hitting, efficient converter, you need a small 9.5" clutch. but they you will have a large (rpm) stall.

its impossible to get a high str without a high rpm flash point yet keeping efficiency within range.
Old 10-10-2005, 10:32 PM
  #7  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
 
DeViOuSwOn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 115
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by gator's 99TA
you cant just "ask" for more str. str is a ratio or a rating. whatever combination you need rpm flash wise is most important. the str is determined by the combination of convertor size and flash rpm desire at the expense of efficiency. you fellas are confusing the tech aspect of the stall converter. if you want a hard hitting, efficient converter, you need a small 9.5" clutch. but they you will have a large (rpm) stall.

its impossible to get a high str without a high rpm flash point yet keeping efficiency within range.
So would a 3600 2.2 be good for the gear I have and mods?
Old 10-10-2005, 10:36 PM
  #8  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
 
DeViOuSwOn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 115
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I also do not want to be replacing a trans anytime soon.
Old 10-11-2005, 02:02 PM
  #9  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (33)
 
LS1-450's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,783
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 8 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by DeViOuSwOn
I also do not want to be replacing a trans anytime soon.

If you want to save the transmission, get 3.42's or 3.73's in the rear end, buy a 3200-2.0 torque converter, & install an 18,000 GVW or higher transmission cooler. Also, hope that any engine modifications don't exceed a flywheel torque of 350-375 #-ft or less (this should be within the service factor of the transmission (maybe)).

Last edited by LS1-450; 10-11-2005 at 02:09 PM.
Old 10-11-2005, 07:21 PM
  #10  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
gator's 99TA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Tampa Bay
Posts: 9,971
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

1) talk to the convertor builder
2) pick your stall size needed (powerband, shift point, shift extension, gearing, weight)
3) pick your convertor size (for efficiency issues)
4) the str will be taken care of.

you guys are missing the point of my post. str is a theoretical number achieved when you put a certian sized converter clutch and stall rating (for a given amount of tq and rearend gearing).
Old 06-29-2006, 09:44 AM
  #11  
TECH Enthusiast
 
MNR-0's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Australia
Posts: 647
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Yup. You can't pick a converter on STR alone, just like you can't pick a cam on LSA alone. For a DD you want matched STR, not higher or lower for the sake of it, and within reason. Ideally, you want the most efficient, best road feel converter you can get for the stall speed you want. You need to match it to your cars power band, when it comes on cam, what you intend buying it for, will you be towing etc..

You can have a 3600/2.2 and 3600/1.6. The 2.2 would feel way better on the street and at the lights, netting you a better 60'. Why do ppl. go for lower STR? Because their needs are different, for example, a turbo that needs high RPM efficiency but spool RPM for launch. A 2.2STR is pretty high and going any higher you WILL sacrifice efficiency and horsepower to the wheels for a better launch - if you can hold it.

I have a 3400/2.1STR converter and it is about as high as I would go for a DD. But my opinion of what is best wil differ to someone else. My all round best recommendtion for a daily driver is a 3000/2.0. 3400+ is biassing on the track side. Any smaller and the gains are closer to stock, but they are still there.
Old 08-06-2006, 03:39 AM
  #12  
On The Tree
iTrader: (3)
 
spare tire's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Sux City
Posts: 149
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

mine is a 2.1 and it seems to hit pretty hard. W/ out drags I couldnt hook up at all tillabout 35mph. I also got the 3.23 rear gears. I would say not to go over a 2.2 STR. Thats just my two cents though
Old 08-07-2006, 10:25 PM
  #13  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (11)
 
Full-Force's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Upstate of SC
Posts: 3,069
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

How does Fuddle test the STR anyway? Somebody is lying because Yank says that only them (yank) and Precision can test STR.
Old 08-08-2006, 02:41 PM
  #14  
Launching!
iTrader: (15)
 
MRZ28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Wright Patterson AFB
Posts: 231
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Full-Force
How does Fuddle test the STR anyway? Somebody is lying because Yank says that only them (yank) and Precision can test STR.

Bumb...
Old 08-10-2006, 10:43 PM
  #15  
On The Tree
iTrader: (7)
 
qwiktim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Akron area
Posts: 191
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Fuddle lying? Noooooooooooooo................... they've never done that......
Old 08-11-2006, 12:11 AM
  #16  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (11)
 
Full-Force's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Upstate of SC
Posts: 3,069
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

Not saying that its them that are lying. I just know that Yank says that anyone besides them and Precision Industries that advertises STR is making false claims. False claims = polite term for lie.
Old 08-11-2006, 03:24 AM
  #17  
TECH Enthusiast
 
MNR-0's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Australia
Posts: 647
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

So I guess the thousands of converter manufacturers across the globe that use the Sonnex lookup charts for STR and STALL RPM based on mathematical and real-world research are lying too?

Get real...

Change the weight and power of a car, and the stall and STR changes. Its a crap shoot unless you get a custom made converter.
Old 08-12-2006, 12:33 AM
  #18  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (11)
 
Full-Force's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Upstate of SC
Posts: 3,069
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

I think you are preaching to the wrong congregation. Yank and Precision Industries are the only 2 I know of that are saying this.




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:09 AM.