Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

2001 Stock Heads Adequate For Comp 212/218 .522/.529 Cam

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-22-2005, 10:25 AM
  #1  
Teching In
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
TX01Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 38
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default 2001 Stock Heads Adequate For Comp 212/218 .522/.529 Cam

I have a 2001 LS1, A4, 2OTL, Lid. Will add headers eventually. Planning to install a Comp 212/218 .522/.529 cam for low end torque, street use only.

With the above in mind, are stock heads adequate, or will this mild street cam produce even more power with a head like the TEA 5.7 stage 1.

Thanks for the help.
Old 10-22-2005, 10:27 AM
  #2  
LS1 Tech Administrator
iTrader: (14)
 
Patrick G's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Victoria, TX
Posts: 8,244
Likes: 0
Received 31 Likes on 27 Posts

Default

Stock heads are more than adequate for a cam of that size. You should pick up power everywhere should you decide to upgrade to TEA heads in the future.
__________________

2013 Corvette Grand Sport A6 LME forged 416, Greg Good ported TFS 255 LS3 heads, 222/242 .629"/.604" 121LSA Pat G blower cam, ARH 1 7/8" headers, ESC Novi 1500 Supercharger w/8 rib direct drive conversion, 747rwhp/709rwtq on 93 octane, 801rwhp/735rwtq on race fuel, 10.1 @ 147.25mph 1/4 mile, 174.7mph Half Mile.
2016 Corvette Z51 M7 Magnuson Heartbeat 2300 supercharger, TSP LT headers, Pat G tuned, 667rwhp, 662rwtq, 191mph TX Mile.
2009.5 Pontiac G8 GT 6.0L, A6, AFR 230v2 heads. 506rwhp/442rwtq. 11.413 @ 121.29mph 1/4 mile, 168.7mph TX Mile
2000 Pewter Ram Air Trans Am M6 heads/cam 508 rwhp/445 rwtq SAE, 183.092 TX Mile
2018 Cadillac Escalade 6.2L A10 Pat G tuned.
LS1,LS2,LS3,LS7,LT1 Custom Camshaft Specialist For custom camshaft help press here.
Custom LSX tuning in person or via email press here.
Old 10-22-2005, 11:15 AM
  #3  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (42)
 
SUTTERERMAN85's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: North Fort Worth
Posts: 1,430
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

you will need valve springs for the stock heads. ls6 are prob perfect and cheap. stock ls1 are not good enough even for a small cam like that.
Old 10-22-2005, 01:10 PM
  #4  
Teching In
 
NeoPaladin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

That is exactly the cam that I plan to get in the future. Either that or their 216/220 grind. Let me know what you think of the cam, I think a cam like that would be perfect for a car that just sees street duty.
Old 10-22-2005, 01:39 PM
  #5  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (2)
 
nuzee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Hawaii
Posts: 618
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I think you are making a wise choice. That cam should give you alot of flexibility if you should ever decide to do other mods, or if you do your build in increments. If you ever get the itch to gain more top end power, just throw on a set of higher ratio rockers. Worked for me on similar type lobes. Goodluck!
Old 10-22-2005, 03:24 PM
  #6  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (19)
 
MattIROC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: San Antonio, Tx
Posts: 790
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I'd go with something bigger....
Old 10-23-2005, 03:39 PM
  #7  
Teching In
 
NeoPaladin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I don't know what emissions are like in TX, but at least out here in CA, the biggest cam that we can run and get away with it is a 224/224 on a 114. I figure that I'm really not giving up too much peak power (probably less than ~10 rwhp) and I'd be running a cam that'd give consistent gains across the rev band, particularly around the 3500-5500 RPM range, which, when I'm playing on the street is about as crazy as I'm willing to get. Plus, I'd rather have the torque over peak HP.
Old 10-23-2005, 06:34 PM
  #8  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
bigdsz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Mount Dora, Fla
Posts: 1,876
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I ran the Comp 216/220 .525/.532 114 lsa for a couple of years, what a great cam. Slight lope, great low end grunt. You really ought to get headers first, then cam, then heads in that order.
Old 10-23-2005, 09:02 PM
  #9  
TECH Enthusiast
 
glennhl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Chandler, Arizona
Posts: 749
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I think a 224 is the smallest cam you should put in an Fbody LS1. 112 LSA for a 6 speed, 114 LSA for an auto. After a tune, my 224 drives like a stock cam. But it does have a lot more power from 2000 to 6600 rpm!
Old 10-23-2005, 09:10 PM
  #10  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (15)
 
my01camaroz28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Junction City, Kansas
Posts: 399
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I have the 216/220 cam and love it. I am looking for more power at this point now. Running bolt ons, tune, exhaust, cam and valve train upgrade with an M6 on stock heads. The powerband is great and you will notice a difference. In my opinion, you will regret not going a little bigger later.

I bought a set of stock ls2 heads and matched a 228/228, .588/.588, 112 cam to it with a set of 3:73 gears ready and dual exhaust coming soon.

With the current set up I have 361.8 rwhp and 362.9 rwtq.
Old 10-23-2005, 09:28 PM
  #11  
ЯєŧąяĐ Єl¡m¡иąŧøя ™
iTrader: (18)
 
orangeapeel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Justin, TX
Posts: 16,083
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by TX01Z
Planning to install a Comp 212/218 .522/.529 cam for low end torque, street use only.
That is borderline mild for being that small...
What is the LSA on it? 115 116?
Old 10-24-2005, 07:23 PM
  #12  
Teching In
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
TX01Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 38
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by orangeapeel
That is borderline mild for being that small...
What is the LSA on it? 115 116?
114, it will move the power down the curve from the typical stock cam . . .
Old 10-24-2005, 08:01 PM
  #13  
10 Second Fun Car
iTrader: (7)
 
jlrz28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Pearland, Tx
Posts: 2,045
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Ive got a 216/220 .522 .522 lift cam on 116. I love it, great drivability and good numbers as well.
Old 10-24-2005, 08:45 PM
  #14  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (6)
 
Schantin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Ft. Irwin, California (But Virginia is home)
Posts: 1,501
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by glennhl
I think a 224 is the smallest cam you should put in an Fbody LS1. 112 LSA for a 6 speed, 114 LSA for an auto. After a tune, my 224 drives like a stock cam. But it does have a lot more power from 2000 to 6600 rpm!
Have the same. Excellent all around cam for track/ daily driving.
Old 10-24-2005, 11:37 PM
  #15  
Pontiacerator
iTrader: (12)
 
RevGTO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Wichita KS / Rancho San Diego
Posts: 6,125
Received 194 Likes on 163 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by glennhl
I think a 224 is the smallest cam you should put in an Fbody LS1. 112 LSA for a 6 speed, 114 LSA for an auto. After a tune, my 224 drives like a stock cam. But it does have a lot more power from 2000 to 6600 rpm!
Yeah, but what if you have an A4 and you'd like hp to peak about 6000?
Old 10-25-2005, 05:38 AM
  #16  
TECH Senior Member
 
PREDATOR-Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: BFE
Posts: 14,620
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 16 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by RevGTO
Yeah, but what if you have an A4 and you'd like hp to peak about 6000?
Then something like 224/224, .565/.565 110 lsa
Old 10-25-2005, 08:55 AM
  #17  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Ragtop 99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Bethesda, MD
Posts: 9,491
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

I have a 2001 LS1, A4, 2OTL, Lid. Will add headers eventually. Planning to install a Comp 212/218 .522/.529 cam for low end torque, street use only.
If you have an A4, a 3000 stall converter will cure your low end torque issues, be very drivable and allow you to pick a cam that will make a much better improvement in the midrange and top end.
Old 10-25-2005, 10:12 AM
  #18  
TECH Enthusiast
 
glennhl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Chandler, Arizona
Posts: 749
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by RevGTO
Yeah, but what if you have an A4 and you'd like hp to peak about 6000?
Why would you want to peak that low? Put in the 224 and reprogram your auto to shift around 6500. These engines love to rev!
Old 10-25-2005, 10:21 AM
  #19  
JS
10 Second Club
iTrader: (4)
 
JS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Delray Beach, Fl.
Posts: 7,303
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

I have alittle info
I had a 218-224 527-535 114+4 I used to shift at 6200,it ran 11.70's@114
Threw a set of S1 heads on the car and went 11.40's@117

U DONT NEED TO SHIFT AT 6500

My new GTO has a very small cam
214-222 559-566 115+4...It was put in becuase I wanted a cam designed for shorties (standard split) that sounded stock but pulled hard to 6500 w/good lowend..

I shift it at 6300 w/the rev limiter set at 6500..
I will be adding either a blower or a good set of heads to my GTO over the winter....

I also had 2 versions of the TR224
It doesnt sound stock...
Old 10-25-2005, 02:02 PM
  #20  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Ragtop 99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Bethesda, MD
Posts: 9,491
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

BTW, I think Vinci has a 212/218 112 cam that I would look at if you really want to stay in that duration. It has a bit more lift and overlap and will make more power than the comp with little or no negative effect in drivability.


Quick Reply: 2001 Stock Heads Adequate For Comp 212/218 .522/.529 Cam



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:40 AM.