Forced Induction Superchargers | Turbochargers | Intercoolers

Driveability of 9.0 ish :1 when not in boost?

Old 11-10-2005, 02:44 PM
  #1  
TECH Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
Scalpel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Lexington, Ky
Posts: 7,000
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default Driveability of 9.0 ish :1 when not in boost?

For those that have lowered their SCR to about 9.0:1 or so give or take +/- 0.5, how does the car drive when you're not in the boost?
Old 11-10-2005, 02:48 PM
  #2  
9 Second Club
iTrader: (27)
 
Tiago's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: HOUSTON-TX
Posts: 3,685
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

drives just fine
Old 11-10-2005, 03:02 PM
  #3  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (2)
 
Ed Blown Vert's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Sunny San Diego
Posts: 3,066
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Works fine here with 9.0:1

Last edited by Ed Blown Vert; 11-10-2005 at 06:35 PM.
Old 11-10-2005, 03:23 PM
  #4  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (48)
 
smokinHawk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Columbus, ohio
Posts: 7,354
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

not to bad, throttle isnt as quite as snappy.
you just need to up the timing a bit more.
when i went back to na i only rana 13.6@104 with the lower CR and my 224/224-114 cam, didnt put enough timing on it.
Old 11-10-2005, 03:23 PM
  #5  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (21)
 
NA$TY-TA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 10,333
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

fine here... drove mine around with out the blower and got 17mpg with my auto and 3.73's.... 8.87:1 comp.....
Kyle
Old 11-10-2005, 05:45 PM
  #6  
9 Second Club
iTrader: (2)
 
TURBO383WS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Andrews, Texas
Posts: 248
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

i've been driving my 383 w/ 9.1-1 compression for about 1 1/2 years w/ no issues what-so-ever. throttle response under 3k Rpm is crappy, but i'm not under 3k very often. i've shredded an aluminum driveshaft and destroyed the stock 10 bolt with a motor setup for a turbo, so no complaints on power.
Old 11-10-2005, 05:48 PM
  #7  
9 Second Club
iTrader: (2)
 
SuperZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Amarillo,TX
Posts: 1,205
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

8.7 here and no probs!
Old 11-10-2005, 06:07 PM
  #8  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (59)
 
MIGHTYMOUSE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Virginia
Posts: 10,010
Received 45 Likes on 31 Posts

Default

8 here no problems
Old 11-10-2005, 08:41 PM
  #9  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (5)
 
KAOS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,570
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post

Default

you comin over to the dark side
Old 11-10-2005, 09:27 PM
  #10  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (16)
 
67Ranger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 655
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

i'll let you know in a few months whenever mine is done....
Old 11-10-2005, 09:44 PM
  #11  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (5)
 
ABeasst's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 1,417
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

8.5 no probs been running 3 months with no power adder
Old 11-10-2005, 11:05 PM
  #12  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (16)
 
67Ranger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 655
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

i think my setup should be around 8.8:1, is the only difference going to be a little less HP, and not as much low end throttle response?
Old 11-10-2005, 11:13 PM
  #13  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (10)
 
FastKat's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 2,487
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Another thing to consider... I think you would have to take into consideration things like the cam you're using, manifolds/headers, valve size, etc. All of those things shift your torque curve around. A high durtion cam (I think), headers and large valves all shift your torque curve higher up the RPM band, usually leaving you with less low end torque.

Also, can you make up for any low end torque loss with your tune?
Old 11-11-2005, 09:59 AM
  #14  
Launching!
 
jdp244's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 226
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

So what it sounds like I am reading here is if you were to get a FI motor built and not put the turbo on right away then it would be ok to drive for a while? I have been thinking about this for a while.
Old 11-11-2005, 10:03 AM
  #15  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (5)
 
LittleRedZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Germantown, MD
Posts: 538
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jdp244
So what it sounds like I am reading here is if you were to get a FI motor built and not put the turbo on right away then it would be ok to drive for a while? I have been thinking about this for a while.
yeah but it will be pretty slow, my blower is off right now and if i get on it lets just say its night and day difference
Old 11-11-2005, 10:14 AM
  #16  
Launching!
 
jdp244's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 226
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Thats ok, im thinking about getting a motor built at one place and a turbo at another. I wasnt sure if you could do it.
Old 11-11-2005, 10:22 AM
  #17  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
PurEvl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: South of Heaven
Posts: 5,469
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

drives better then my old 11:1 setup and made alot more power


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: Driveability of 9.0 ish :1 when not in boost?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:54 AM.