Is a 100rwhp dry safe?
11-19-2005, 09:46 AM
#2
their is no such thing as safe N2O but in my oppion a wet kit would be safer if thats what your looking for. in addition i have a 100 NX wet kit on my 95 T/A and i get about 50 1/8 mile runs to the bottle a buddy of mine has a 100 dry kit on his mustang and only gets about 12 runs on the same track.
11-19-2005, 10:17 AM
#3
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (23)
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Posts: 3,467
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by 95 N2OT/A
their is no such thing as safe N2O but in my oppion a wet kit would be safer if thats what your looking for. in addition i have a 100 NX wet kit on my 95 T/A and i get about 50 1/8 mile runs to the bottle a buddy of mine has a 100 dry kit on his mustang and only gets about 12 runs on the same track.
codewhitfield, with all the right safety equipment you should have no problems.
11-19-2005, 11:18 AM
#4
Banned
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: May 2005
Location: HTown
Posts: 427
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by codewhitfield
Is a 100rwhp shot from a Nirto Dave safe on a 02 Z28????
You should be OK with 100 shot. Just be sure you get the safety devices that go along with it to protect your motor such as:
1) Fuel pressure safety switch
2) RPM Window switch
Also make sure you get your motor custum tuned so that it doesn't run in a lean condition with the nitrous.
Trending Topics
11-19-2005, 12:34 PM
#8
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: TEXASS
Posts: 3,202
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by 95 N2OT/A
their is no such thing as safe N2O but in my oppion a wet kit would be safer if thats what your looking for. in addition i have a 100 NX wet kit on my 95 T/A and i get about 50 1/8 mile runs to the bottle a buddy of mine has a 100 dry kit on his mustang and only gets about 12 runs on the same track.
11-19-2005, 03:19 PM
#9
A dry 100 kit from Dave is safe very safe, and doable on your car all day.
For the misinformed who stated wet is safer, try to find someone who has lifted thier intake/hood with a dry kit, you won't. Know try to say that about a wet kit, you can't, so saying a wet is safer is ridiculous.
Robert
For the misinformed who stated wet is safer, try to find someone who has lifted thier intake/hood with a dry kit, you won't. Know try to say that about a wet kit, you can't, so saying a wet is safer is ridiculous.
Robert
11-19-2005, 10:04 PM
#11
Originally Posted by cantdrv65
One is no safer than the other....
Robert
11-20-2005, 01:33 AM
#13
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: TEXASS
Posts: 3,202
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Robert56
Not to start an argument or a debate, but answer this question. Why do we see threads and video of the destruction that a wet hit can cause and we don't see this pertaining to dry?
Robert
Robert
Ive seen a dry hit blow the lid off before. Spray a 200 rwhp dry hit below say 1500 rpms and please take a video.....
11-20-2005, 05:10 PM
#17
Originally Posted by cantdrv65
Id say it has something to do with the popularity of wet kits.
Ive seen a dry hit blow the lid off before. Spray a 200 rwhp dry hit below say 1500 rpms and please take a video.....
Ive seen a dry hit blow the lid off before. Spray a 200 rwhp dry hit below say 1500 rpms and please take a video.....
I had the n20 stick on a run and bottle went from about 1000psi to 600psi and was still spraying on the return lane. No problemo, hurt nothing and continued to race after fixing wot switch (it was taped down and drove to track with it spraying both stages above 3000rpm, try this with a wet kit.
Robert
11-20-2005, 08:39 PM
#20
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Fairview Heights Illinois
Posts: 1,851
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Robert56
Not to start an argument or a debate, but answer this question. Why do we see threads and video of the destruction that a wet hit can cause and we don't see this pertaining to dry?
Robert
Robert
Those explosions were caused by Improvised Explosive Devices (IED's) planted by terrorists, and absolutely cannot be linked to the use of any of the fine "wet kits" out there.
GM had in fact planned for these new intake manifolds to be designed specifically to handle the fuel flow from these wet nitrous kits. (It was an insider deal between N2O kit makers and GM)
I'm sorry Robert, but you were just left out of the loop on this information. It was an honest mistake for you to assume that the overwhelming amount of reported failures with wet kits proves that they aren't as safe as a dry system.
I'll let it slide this time.
