Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Mill heads vs. welding chambers

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-23-2005, 10:33 AM
  #1  
TECH Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
GuitsBoy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 6,249
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default Mill heads vs. welding chambers

I have a set of 241 heads that Im porting out. I also have an f13 cam (230/232, .595/.585). Id like to bump up the compression a bit. Would I be better off milling down the heads and then flycutting the pistons to clear the cam? Or should I just weld in a little extra aluminum back into the combustion chambers on the side of the spark plug boss? What are the pros and cons of each?
Old 12-23-2005, 11:18 AM
  #2  
Banned
iTrader: (2)
 
SStrokerAce's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: NY
Posts: 2,344
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Welding can get you a better shape if you know what you are doing.... problem is you need to put new seats and guides in the heads most times. If you keep the heat out of the heads then you might get away with it, but I wouldn't trust it.

Milling too much can get into the valve seat which will hurt your flow, so there is always a comprimise.

Bret
Old 12-23-2005, 11:45 AM
  #3  
TECH Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
GuitsBoy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 6,249
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Well, depending on how much chamber polishing I need to do, Ill probably have to mill a max of .040. Ill use a thinner gasket to recoup some compression, and Im shooting for milling around the .030 area and aiming for a 11.33 static compression ratio. I could possibly get away without even flycutting, but I dont want to chance it. As per alan futral, my f-13 has .095 P to V clearance on the intake. Reducing that to a mere .050 clearance is getting a little close for comfort.
Old 12-23-2005, 12:14 PM
  #4  
Moderator
iTrader: (11)
 
jimmyblue's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: East Central Florida
Posts: 12,605
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts

Default

Seems to me like a pair of 243s would put you
a lot closer to your goal (CR, flow) with less
work? These pop up for barely insane prices
from time to time esp. locally from non-Internet
people who don't know pricing.

The Patriot welded-up heads, I seem to recall,
had some problems that got people riled up a
year or two back. Welding up on a pressure
vessel takes better than shade-tree metallurgy
(heat control, filler) I reckon. Not to mention a
bunch more grinding, by hand, to identical
volume in the chamber. At least shaving them,
you keep the original integrity.
Old 12-23-2005, 12:26 PM
  #5  
TECH Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
GuitsBoy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 6,249
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Id love to do the 243 castings, but im on a dirt cheap budget right now. Ive already bought 3 pairs of 241 heads (one guy ripped me off and never shipped, and another set I bought from bo as practice heads as one was already compromised from the previous owner before bo). Anyway, im tired of spending money on heads. The whole Idea was to do this on the cheap for the cost of a carbide burr and some cartridge rolls...

As far as the welding goes, I wouldnt do this myself after seeing my awful beads on my exhaust

Last edited by GuitsBoy; 12-23-2005 at 12:31 PM.
Old 12-23-2005, 12:33 PM
  #6  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (25)
 
2xLS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Warr Acres, OK
Posts: 5,649
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts

Default

I'm pretty sure the company known for welding chambers sends them out to be re heat treated afterwords.
Old 12-23-2005, 12:42 PM
  #7  
TECH Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
GuitsBoy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 6,249
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Good to know.

I think im pretty well decided ill just mill em and be done with it. Thats what I had planned on doing from the start.

Thanks for the helpful info guys!
Old 12-23-2005, 01:08 PM
  #8  
Launching!
iTrader: (2)
 
FDLS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Toronto
Posts: 234
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Just got my 241 heads back from TEA and I got Stage 1 Milled 0.030, CNC ported and A valve job. I'd say get them milled it will bump you up and then get some Cometic 0.40 gaskets and you should be close to where you want for compression. I think the Chambers end up being 63cc after the heads are milled from what TEA told me.
Old 12-23-2005, 01:24 PM
  #9  
TECH Fanatic
 
SideStep's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,942
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by GuitsBoy
Good to know.

I think im pretty well decided ill just mill em and be done with it. Thats what I had planned on doing from the start.

Thanks for the helpful info guys!

Cool... Every .006 is approximately 1 CC of chamber volume. So milling them .030 will drop you 5cc. If the heads started out untouched I believe they are 66.67cc - 5 gets you to 61.67...

I think your F13 is +4, so you should have a static of 10.9ish and a DCR of 8.5, damn good numbers... assuming something like a .045 Cometic head gasket and a 1cc fly-cut on the pistons…

Old 12-27-2005, 09:28 AM
  #10  
FormerVendor
iTrader: (20)
 
Gunnar@Patriot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,416
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

We are able to weld our chambers because we start with raw GM castings which are +.050" on all surfaces. We preheat the heads, weld, and then send the heads out for heat treating.
Old 12-27-2005, 09:37 AM
  #11  
!LS1 11 Second Club
 
SouthFL.02.SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Miami
Posts: 7,133
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by FDLS1
Just got my 241 heads back from TEA and I got Stage 1 Milled 0.030, CNC ported and A valve job. I'd say get them milled it will bump you up and then get some Cometic 0.40 gaskets and you should be close to where you want for compression. I think the Chambers end up being 63cc after the heads are milled from what TEA told me.
X2 for the TEA stage 1 treatment. Also ,from what I've read, their 59cc 5.7 chamber will give you better PTV clearance than their 1.5 5.3L head.
Old 12-27-2005, 09:40 AM
  #12  
TECH Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
GuitsBoy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 6,249
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by SouthFL.02.SS
Also ,from what I've read, a 59cc 5.7 chamber will give you better PTV clearance than a similar 5.3L head.
Really? That is an interesting tid bit there. I knew the 5.3's had their seats a little lower, but I didnt know it was that much.

How tight do you think I can run my P to V?
Old 12-27-2005, 09:54 AM
  #13  
!LS1 11 Second Club
 
SouthFL.02.SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Miami
Posts: 7,133
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by GuitsBoy
Really? That is an interesting tid bit there. I knew the 5.3's had their seats a little lower, but I didnt know it was that much.

How tight do you think I can run my P to V?
I don't know , I'm just regurgitating info from this thread....
https://ls1tech.com/forums/showthrea...ight=tea+stage

From Pg.2 (flow #'s on pg. 3)
the differences between this head and our 1.5 head is castings and valves. Obviouslt we do not supply new castings like we do with our 5.3 heads. And due to flow it will not make as much power as our 5.3 head.
We are very excited to be able to offer this new head since the flow is so good for the dollar spent.
We have not had any dyno testing yet to be able confirm our beliefs on the power the new Stage 1 head is going to make. But I would expect it be about 20 rwhp shy of our 5.3 head.
The nice thing is with the new 5.7 head even when milled to 59cc it does have more P to V than out 5.3 1.5 head. So larger cams will not be a problem.



Quick Reply: Mill heads vs. welding chambers



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:58 PM.