Generation III External Engine LS1 | LS6 | Bolt-Ons | Intakes | Exhaust | Ignition | Accessories
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Dirt passing through foam {K&N, Holly} filters

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-12-2006, 01:34 PM
  #1  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
 
fnbrowning's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 175
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default Dirt passing through gauze {K&N, Holly} filters

I was researching a cold air kit for another car I own, on other automotive sites. I began to notice some posts about how the oiled gauze filters were no longer recommended because they pass too much dirt & accelerate engine wear.

One thread pointed to this test as proof: precise filter test

The conclusion of the test appears to be that while oiled gauze filters DO provide more air flow, they do it with a significant increase in dirt ingested.

Currently, I'm running a Holly PowerShot filter on my WS6, but I'm concerned that I may be allowing too much dirt through to the motor!

What does everyone here think?

Last edited by fnbrowning; 02-12-2006 at 02:08 PM.
Old 02-12-2006, 01:38 PM
  #2  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
taintedmeat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: ATX
Posts: 1,625
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I think the nil gain isn't worth it. Stick with a cheap paper filter.
Old 02-12-2006, 02:05 PM
  #3  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (6)
 
WILWAXU's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: League City, TX
Posts: 14,378
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

They are Gauze, not foam.

I agree, the paper ones work pretty well. IMO go with the cheaper paper ones and change them instead of cleaning.
Old 02-12-2006, 03:05 PM
  #4  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (2)
 
HeapaShifter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Myrtle Beach, SC
Posts: 845
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I think that's a good study that they did. Now I have proof to show people that aftermarket filters aren't worth it.

I've always used the AC Delco filters because aftermarket filters really doesn't increase power by much at all and they allow some dirt through. Also over oiled filters will ruin the MAF sensor.

I'm glad that there are charts and graphs that prove it.
Old 02-12-2006, 03:15 PM
  #5  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (4)
 
anotherreject04's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Baltimore
Posts: 514
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

damn that waas a extensive test...but still lots of people swear by k+n
Old 02-12-2006, 03:20 PM
  #6  
TECH Addict
 
300bhp/ton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: England
Posts: 2,649
Received 13 Likes on 8 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by fnbrowning
I was researching a cold air kit for another car I own, on other automotive sites. I began to notice some posts about how the oiled gauze filters were no longer recommended because they pass too much dirt & accelerate engine wear.

One thread pointed to this test as proof: precise filter test

The conclusion of the test appears to be that while oiled gauze filters DO provide more air flow, they do it with a significant increase in dirt ingested.

Currently, I'm running a Holly PowerShot filter on my WS6, but I'm concerned that I may be allowing too much dirt through to the motor!

What does everyone here think?
Nothing new here.

OEM Paper filters have been bench flow tested and they are good for upto 500bhp. The only real way to reduce restriction is at the loss of filtering ability.

However many cotton weave and foam filters have been used extensivly. If you have one, don't worry about it.

If you still have a paper one don't waste your money on an aftermarket one.

The best filter type I know of is made by Donaldson, they make the Blackwing CAI for the Corvette. This is sythetic as opposed to cotton weave, it filters almost as well as paper but flows better than most cotton ones. The avaiation industry and commercial diggers heavy plant machinary use them, so they must be good.
Old 02-12-2006, 07:42 PM
  #7  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
 
fnbrowning's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 175
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by 300bhp/ton
Nothing new here.

OEM Paper filters have been bench flow tested and they are good for upto 500bhp. The only real way to reduce restriction is at the loss of filtering ability.

However many cotton weave and foam filters have been used extensivly. If you have one, don't worry about it.
Sorry if this has been discussed before. I did a search and did not turn up anything. One example of why I've started to worry about the cotton weave and foam filters:

Last week I was driving the other car to work. There is road construction along the street, and some worker was using a concrete saw, creating a huge plume of concrete dust.

My choice is, drive through the dust, or don't get to work on time! Incidents like that, you have to trust your filter will protect the engine. Luckly, the filter in my get-to-work car is AC Delco.

I'm looking at the test, and thinking that i could have been driving through a concrete dust plume with a gauze filter - and the gain isn't worth ingesting more dirt over time.
Old 02-12-2006, 10:36 PM
  #8  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (22)
 
Marc '99T/A's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Albany, GA
Posts: 749
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Great link and information.....The only thing is I'm skeptical about the AC Delco filter doing sooooo much better than all the others. It says that this was a test to see what was the best filter for a GM Duramax diesel. I just find it kinda funny that GM's brand filter did that well on a test for their engine. I dunno, maybe there's nothing to it....or maybe there is.
If it is legit, though, that sure says a lot for AC Delco filters! If this is how their air filters stack up, what about the oil filters? Anyone seen any data on that?
Old 02-12-2006, 10:49 PM
  #9  
On The Tree
 
FrozenMonkey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Southern UT
Posts: 150
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

The AC Delco oil filters do very well. I can't find the old post with a whole crapload of info on filters (theres some website out there...a guy tested about 20 or so filters).
Old 02-12-2006, 11:14 PM
  #10  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (3)
 
BlackHawk T/A's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Lincoln, NE
Posts: 2,869
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I have the Powershot and I guess i'll stick with it. There isn't excessive dirt here...and there was no test data on it so we can't know how it compares.
Old 02-12-2006, 11:56 PM
  #11  
ЯєŧąяĐ Єl¡m¡иąŧøя ™
iTrader: (18)
 
orangeapeel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Justin, TX
Posts: 16,083
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

K&N with no problems like this what so ever!
Old 02-13-2006, 03:00 AM
  #12  
TECH Addict
 
300bhp/ton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: England
Posts: 2,649
Received 13 Likes on 8 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by fnbrowning
Sorry if this has been discussed before. I did a search and did not turn up anything. One example of why I've started to worry about the cotton weave and foam filters:

Last week I was driving the other car to work. There is road construction along the street, and some worker was using a concrete saw, creating a huge plume of concrete dust.

My choice is, drive through the dust, or don't get to work on time! Incidents like that, you have to trust your filter will protect the engine. Luckly, the filter in my get-to-work car is AC Delco.

I'm looking at the test, and thinking that i could have been driving through a concrete dust plume with a gauze filter - and the gain isn't worth ingesting more dirt over time.
If you are referring to the metal gauze filters then yes those are crap and DO NOT filter anything smaller than a twig or small animals. Those should be avilded at all cost.

K&N and other cotton weave filters I personalll feel are a rip off in terms of price and performance. But many many people use them so there is a very good track record.

OEM paper filters will always outperform any other type in terms of filtering. This is due to being paper and nothing else.
Old 02-13-2006, 03:12 AM
  #13  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
Benjamin Russick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Chesapeake, VA
Posts: 1,493
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

In my personal experience, the cotton K&N-type filters are terrible in flat-panel form, although they work well in the conical style. My K&N let dirt and grit get all the way to my MAF, so I replaced it with a Fram. I've had no problems since, so I'm sticking with the paper filters. However, I use K&Ns in other vehicles and they work great...dunno.
Old 02-13-2006, 03:32 AM
  #14  
TECH Addict
 
300bhp/ton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: England
Posts: 2,649
Received 13 Likes on 8 Posts

Default

I think the main problem here is dirt particles getting around the side of the panel filter, this is a common problem with such filter type. If the K&N didn't fit quite as well with as good a sealing edge to them, then that is almost certainly the cause as opposed to the eliment itself.

Many after market setups have major issues such as this. The infamous "Vararam" intake for the Corvette is one such example. The filters where foam and poor quality in themselfs so much so that Vararam had to use an alternative, they also had issues with filter fitment and there have been several high profile cases of recked LS1's due to this (Andy @ A&A Corvette has posted several pictures and info on this in the past).

However I think Vararam have imporved the setup, but it is still a risk.
Old 02-13-2006, 03:39 AM
  #15  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
Benjamin Russick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Chesapeake, VA
Posts: 1,493
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I used foam weather-stripping tape and sealed the air-box tight. I think the flat-panel gets overwhelmed (I have a ram-air set-up) versus a cone. You can see where the paper filter get hammered very distinctly...
Old 02-13-2006, 08:02 AM
  #16  
Staging Lane
 
Silver SS in Germany's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Ft Campbell, KY
Posts: 85
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

AMSOIL has a new air fliter out now. I find it hard to believe that 1 filter was the best in all tests.
Old 02-13-2006, 10:09 AM
  #17  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (63)
 
BitViper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Sandy Ego, Ca.
Posts: 2,343
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Only one way to tell for sure....

Place a cloth over the hole of the K/N ( I have a FIPK) ....Hook a vacuum to the engine side and toss some dust in front of the filter and see how much dust is deposited on the cloth....quick dirty and quantitative
Old 02-13-2006, 10:13 AM
  #18  
TECH Addict
 
300bhp/ton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: England
Posts: 2,649
Received 13 Likes on 8 Posts

Default

except that the cloth probably doesn't filter any better than the air filter. So if the dust passes thru the fitler it will also logically pass thru the cloth also.

Either that or I didn't fully undersatnd your post
Old 02-13-2006, 10:53 AM
  #19  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (2)
 
JerseyLS1TA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Jersey Shore
Posts: 1,734
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I think the point of the cloth is to see how dirty it(cloth) gets so you can see how good/bad the K&N filters dust/dirt
Old 02-13-2006, 02:16 PM
  #20  
12 Second Club
 
dailydriver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Bucks County, Pa.
Posts: 4,273
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Silver SS in Germany
AMSOIL has a new air fliter out now. I find it hard to believe that 1 filter was the best in all tests.
Yes, it's their new Ea line and it is based on (and very similar to) the Donaldson filter technology 300 bph/ton was referring to. NO oil to worry about, high flow, long life (clean it by low pressure air or tapping) and filters at least as well as any paper deal. I plan on trying one this spring.


Quick Reply: Dirt passing through foam {K&N, Holly} filters



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:49 AM.