QTP vs Pacesetter
#1
TECH Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Tempe, AZ
Posts: 469
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
QTP vs Pacesetter
I want to know how much better QTP is than Pacesetter. Is there any big difference in HP gains from one to the other? I am trying to decide if QTP is worth the extra $500.
Thanks,
Alex
Thanks,
Alex
#3
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (35)
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Maryland/Illinois
Posts: 1,660
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
If you intend on a cam/heads in the future you might consider the QTP headers. I have seen a few guys make some better power with the HVMC, plus the QTP are good quality stainless.
You get what you pay for I guess.
You get what you pay for I guess.
#4
TECH Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Tempe, AZ
Posts: 469
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
So it will take atleast a cam before the QTPs give any noticeable gain over the other headers? I understand that the QTPs are built better but I am not to worried about rust here in AZ. Do all long tubers provide about the same gains?
~Alex
~Alex
#5
There's a huge difference, stainless vs mild steel (coated). Here's a quick read on the properties of both and why I chose stainless for my setup:
http://www.burnsstainless.com/TechAr...s_article.html
http://www.burnsstainless.com/TechAr...s_article.html
#6
TECH Resident
iTrader: (6)
funny how its from a site thats trying to sell you stainless.....take it with a grain of salt.
btw even WITH a cam u wont see 5hp max difference in the two....
with your current setup MAYBE 1 or 2 hp. with the extra 500 bucks u could make alot more power buying something else with the pacesetters.
btw even WITH a cam u wont see 5hp max difference in the two....
with your current setup MAYBE 1 or 2 hp. with the extra 500 bucks u could make alot more power buying something else with the pacesetters.
#7
On The Tree
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Arizona
Posts: 195
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by STANG KILLA SS 2
funny how its from a site thats trying to sell you stainless.....take it with a grain of salt.
btw even WITH a cam u wont see 5hp max difference in the two....
with your current setup MAYBE 1 or 2 hp. with the extra 500 bucks u could make alot more power buying something else with the pacesetters.
btw even WITH a cam u wont see 5hp max difference in the two....
with your current setup MAYBE 1 or 2 hp. with the extra 500 bucks u could make alot more power buying something else with the pacesetters.
The QTP is a proven header, with no fitment issues what so ever. Just like what was stated before you get what you pay for.
Call Mike @ AzPowerandSound.
Last edited by Brandon; 03-08-2006 at 08:03 AM.
Trending Topics
#8
On The Tree
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Arizona
Posts: 195
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by LS1Lust
So it will take atleast a cam before the QTPs give any noticeable gain over the other headers? I understand that the QTPs are built better but I am not to worried about rust here in AZ. Do all long tubers provide about the same gains?
~Alex
~Alex
#10
On The Tree
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Denver/Houston
Posts: 163
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Mcduffys
This isnt completely true, my brother who also lives in AZ. Is makeing 10-15 more RWHP then his friend who has the exact same mods. He has QTP's and his buddy has Pacesetter.
The QTP is a proven header, with no fitment issues what so ever. Just like what was stated before you get what you pay for.
Call Mike @ AzPowerandSound
The QTP is a proven header, with no fitment issues what so ever. Just like what was stated before you get what you pay for.
Call Mike @ AzPowerandSound
*edit for non sposor contact info*
Last edited by Brandon; 03-08-2006 at 08:03 AM.
#11
On The Tree
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Arizona
Posts: 195
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Covet
Well just to throw in my two cents: different cars often produce different power, even with the exact same mods. Differences in tuning, how the car has been treated, etc can all affect that. The 10-15 HP there, at least from what I understand about headers, is probably due to other factors.
QTP's will make slightly more peak power but will shine under the curve compared to Pacesetters.
#13
On The Tree
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Arizona
Posts: 195
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by LS1Lust
Were there ever any tests done to see how the different headers preformed on the same car?
~Alex
~Alex
*edit for non sposor contact info*
Last edited by Brandon; 03-08-2006 at 08:03 AM.
#15
On The Tree
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Denver/Houston
Posts: 163
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Really if I were you I'd base your choice more around your budget and your plans for this car. If you're planning on making this an extremely modified racing machine, yeah, go with the QTP, they're stainless so they'll last damn near forever and apparently they will produce those few extra horses that some people crave.
If you're like me you have a budget though, and that 9 second car is just a bit unattainable so you choose to save a bit of cash on the headers, sacrificing a small amount of quality, so that you can direct that money elsewhere (cam, new rear end to hold the power you'll be putting in there, new wheels/tires, etc).
Either set of headers are gonna give you a solid amount of power and unless you are REALLY picky I don't think you'll be dissatisfied with either.
If you're like me you have a budget though, and that 9 second car is just a bit unattainable so you choose to save a bit of cash on the headers, sacrificing a small amount of quality, so that you can direct that money elsewhere (cam, new rear end to hold the power you'll be putting in there, new wheels/tires, etc).
Either set of headers are gonna give you a solid amount of power and unless you are REALLY picky I don't think you'll be dissatisfied with either.
#16
hashtagBMW
iTrader: (38)
So an extra 2-3 ponies is worth $500? I understand were all in this for power and times, but thats a bit extensive. I like how there coated but i dont think the price is worth it, it does last and keep the engine cooler but its spendy, its almost like comparing BORLA to FLOWMASTER.
#17
On The Tree
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 131
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I think that they are worth it. For the simple fact that they are stainless. They will be the last header you will ever buy for your car. With that being said, I can't afford them. So pacesetter is better for me because I can afford them NOW.
#19
TECH Resident
iTrader: (6)
Originally Posted by Mcduffys
This isnt completely true, my brother who also lives in AZ. Is makeing 10-15 more RWHP then his friend who has the exact same mods. He has QTP's and his buddy has Pacesetter.
The QTP is a proven header, with no fitment issues what so ever. Just like what was stated before you get what you pay for.
The QTP is a proven header, with no fitment issues what so ever. Just like what was stated before you get what you pay for.
again. use your money wisley. your not building a 10 second car.
heres it is in black and white...
(appoxe HP)
$800 QTP headers= +22 HP
total $800 & 22HP
or
$375 Pacesetter headers= +20 HP (on TSPs 10 second car)
$150 TR ported TB= +5HP
total $525 & 25HP
($275 left for more mods, beer whatever!)
or
$375 Pacesetter headers= +20HP
$400 BBK 80mm TB= +10HP
total $775 & 30HP
Last edited by WILWAXU; 03-08-2006 at 10:18 PM.
#20
Tech Resident
Originally Posted by STANG KILLA SS 2
2 cars 2 dynos 2 different days will have that much difference with the exact same mods........