LT1-LT4 Modifications 1993-97 Gen II Small Block V8

what is the highest hp for stock heads?

Old 03-13-2006, 01:17 AM
  #1  
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
 
whynot's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Boise Idaho
Posts: 300
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default what is the highest hp for stock heads?

like said, stock unported heads, no spray. what is the highest hp anyone has made with any cam, and stock unported heads?
Old 03-13-2006, 01:33 AM
  #2  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
 
urbanhunter44's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 869
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

i know the GM847 is in the 350 rwhp range
Old 03-13-2006, 08:44 AM
  #3  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (8)
 
GIZMO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Shelby, NC
Posts: 2,780
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

I only ran my Camaro once on a dyno, but after tuning it made 423 RWHP. Unported factory heads, intake, stock throttle body, and stock injectors. I finally got it to run 10.5's before I sold it. The cam was a Bullet with factory lift and 25?/26? duration. The motor also had Crane stamped steel replacement rockers.

Daren
Old 03-13-2006, 10:08 AM
  #4  
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
 
whynot's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Boise Idaho
Posts: 300
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by GIZMO
I only ran my Camaro once on a dyno, but after tuning it made 423 RWHP. Unported factory heads, intake, stock throttle body, and stock injectors. I finally got it to run 10.5's before I sold it. The cam was a Bullet with factory lift and 25?/26? duration. The motor also had Crane stamped steel replacement rockers.

Daren
wow, do you have a dyno sheet for that so we can see what your curve looked like?
Old 03-13-2006, 10:24 AM
  #5  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (8)
 
GIZMO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Shelby, NC
Posts: 2,780
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Sorry. I ran the car on B C Allens dyno here in Shelby about two years ago. He didn't have a working printer at that time. I was trying to get my A/F Ratio right and made a bunch of pulls (All day session). Learned a lot about Gen VII DFI that day!

Daren
Old 03-13-2006, 10:46 AM
  #6  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (14)
 
RealQuick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: MA
Posts: 3,970
Received 15 Likes on 10 Posts

Default

I am assuming this wasnt an LT1. If it was, then I believe numbers are bogus. A 210cfm head isnt going to support that much rwhp. Most heads/cam cars (even with a large cam will make that power or slightly less). Factory LT1 heads stall between .450-.500 lift, so I am guessing your big cam was less than optimal anyway with such large duration.

Also, stock injectors wouldnt work out too well at that hp level.
Old 03-13-2006, 10:51 AM
  #7  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (12)
 
T/A KID's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,816
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Numbers aren't bogus he is in a stock eliminator type class, they have to use stock lift put can go with SR applications. You would not want to daily drive the car put it would make one hell of a track car.
You don't have to have heads to make power, but you do if you want to make streetable power. A big cam can make up for a lot.
Old 03-13-2006, 10:54 AM
  #8  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (14)
 
RealQuick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: MA
Posts: 3,970
Received 15 Likes on 10 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by T/A KID
Numbers aren't bogus he is in a stock eliminator type class, they have to use stock lift put can go with SR applications. You would not want to daily drive the car put it would make one hell of a track car.
You don't have to have heads to make power, but you do if you want to make streetable power. A big cam can make up for a lot.
hmm...so he is probably making power in the 7krpm range then? Obviously HP will be higher the igher you spin the engine.

I know dyno numbers can be wrong depending on how the dyno is calibrated. I wasnt saying he as lying, just that something wasnt right. I still find it hard to believe a stock as cast head will support that much power.
Old 03-13-2006, 12:46 PM
  #9  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (8)
 
TwoFast4Lv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: LT1 land...the "409" of the 90s!
Posts: 10,023
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

Most Streetable combinations will make 350 with unported heads no problem

Any thing can happen with an all out race setup and enough Rpm's
Old 03-13-2006, 01:51 PM
  #10  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (8)
 
GIZMO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Shelby, NC
Posts: 2,780
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by RealQuick
I am assuming this wasnt an LT1. If it was, then I believe numbers are bogus. A 210cfm head isnt going to support that much rwhp. Most heads/cam cars (even with a large cam will make that power or slightly less). Factory LT1 heads stall between .450-.500 lift, so I am guessing your big cam was less than optimal anyway with such large duration.

Also, stock injectors wouldnt work out too well at that hp level.

Not bogus at all. LT1's work very well in Stock Eliminator trim. It just took a lot of time and money to get this far. Do the math. The car went 10.50 at 3280 lbs. As stated above the cam has factory lift as mandated by the rules. I would say that it is just about optimal for my set-up. The stock injectors work fine. Several cars that are faster than me are running 24 lb injectors. And yes the car would be awful for street driving!

Daren
Old 03-13-2006, 05:21 PM
  #11  
TECH Fanatic
 
blkchevyz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,101
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

those stock eliminators are damn impressive.

just curious, does it have to have stock lift at the cam or at the rocker arm?
Old 03-13-2006, 05:48 PM
  #12  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (8)
 
GIZMO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Shelby, NC
Posts: 2,780
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by blkchevyz
those stock eliminators are damn impressive.

just curious, does it have to have stock lift at the cam or at the rocker arm?
Lift is read at the retainer.
Old 03-13-2006, 05:53 PM
  #13  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (14)
 
RealQuick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: MA
Posts: 3,970
Received 15 Likes on 10 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by GIZMO
Not bogus at all. LT1's work very well in Stock Eliminator trim. It just took a lot of time and money to get this far. Do the math. The car went 10.50 at 3280 lbs. As stated above the cam has factory lift as mandated by the rules. I would say that it is just about optimal for my set-up. The stock injectors work fine. Several cars that are faster than me are running 24 lb injectors. And yes the car would be awful for street driving!

Daren
Damn Daren, sounds like a beast. Did you up your fuel pressure in order to retain the injectors? My injectors were maxxed at 383rwhp at stock fuel pressure...

By the way, pass the towel so I can wipe the mud off my face...
Old 03-13-2006, 06:17 PM
  #14  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (8)
 
GIZMO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Shelby, NC
Posts: 2,780
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by RealQuick
Damn Daren, sounds like a beast. Did you up your fuel pressure in order to retain the injectors? My injectors were maxxed at 383rwhp at stock fuel pressure...

By the way, pass the towel so I can wipe the mud off my face...
No mud on your face. When I was running 11.30's I thought that everyone had to be cheating their butts off to run 10.90's! Now I know better.

I run my fuel pressure at 50 PSI and feed the fuel rails with 8-AN line and Aeromotive pump which is fed by a 10-AN line from the fuel cell. The return is a 6-AN. A good fuel system is the trick to running small injectors and keeping the fuel cool (now I've let out one of those Top Secret tricks!).

Take Care,

Daren
Old 03-13-2006, 10:59 PM
  #15  
On The Tree
 
93turboLT1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Portage, MI
Posts: 105
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I think i make right around 365rwhp with my setup, with has stock heads, intake, and throttle body. I trapped 113 and wiegh 3500lbs. but i have an aluminum flywheel and driveshaft, and 3.42's.
Old 03-13-2006, 11:05 PM
  #16  
Banned
iTrader: (1)
 
TransAm6383's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Everywhere
Posts: 319
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

i promise you..no cam only stock LT1 makes that much power..i dont care how much you say you did..not to mention you dont even have a dyno sheet..how weird....
Old 03-13-2006, 11:12 PM
  #17  
On The Tree
 
93turboLT1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Portage, MI
Posts: 105
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

god damn....what kind of #'s would he be looking at with a set of ported trick flow's around 300cfm @ .500! 600rwhp!
Old 03-13-2006, 11:17 PM
  #18  
Banned
iTrader: (1)
 
TransAm6383's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Everywhere
Posts: 319
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

lol..prolly more than that...
Old 03-14-2006, 01:05 AM
  #19  
Launching!
iTrader: (12)
 
Camaroguy22's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Maryland
Posts: 220
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I have never heard of that much power on a stock head before. News to me.
Old 03-14-2006, 02:48 AM
  #20  
TECH Apprentice
 
Silverback's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 374
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Well, not that I’ve seen it in person, but the stock heads flow around 230 on the intake, which works out to enough flow to make about 470-475hp at the crank, or about 375 at the wheels (20% loss) if everything else was optimized, so I don’t really see a problem with the claims made.

Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: what is the highest hp for stock heads?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:44 PM.