Magnacharger C6 Vette Results!
04-20-2006, 08:58 AM
#1
Magnacharger C6 Vette Results! Wow, what a week of thrashing trying to get this Corvette ready to attend the Year One show this weekend. Thanks goes out to Mike at Icon Autosports for assisting with the cam, exhaust, and blower installation. We worked to almost midnight twice this week. Conley's Performance Plus stayed open until 1am this morning dyno tuning the car on their Mustang chassis dyno. But, I'm happy to say the car is DONE....for now 
Specs:
2005 Corvette Z51, 6-spd manual
230/230 .591/.591 114 CompCam, valvesprings, pushrods
LG Motorsports longtube headers with X-pipe (no cats)
Magnaflow catback system
Magna Charger supercharger with 42# injectors, low boost pulley.
stock shortblock, stock unported heads, stock fuel pump with Magnavolt booster.
The big pulley on this blower made a whopping 5.0 psi boost. Sounds somewhat low, but its safe I suppose. This one has a 3.4" pulley on it right now, I had a 2.90" pulley on my previous Magnacharger car.
Mustang Chassis Dyno, tuned with wideband O2 and HP Tuners:
509.88 rwhp, 456.56 ft-lbs
This Mustang Dyno is about 8-10% lower in numbers compared to the typical Dynojet brand dyno numbers. For comparison's sake, that means between 550-560 rwhp via Dynojet.
Not bad for only 5 psi and a safe A/F tune!
The torque line is amazing on this setup. At only 3K rpm, it hits over 400 ft-lbs (432-440 Dynojet) and goes nearly straight across the entire powerband.
Needless to say, this car feels completely different than before. I did some ~ahem~ test runs at 2am on a deserted backroad at 140 mph and it was scary fast. Raceweight is around 3385 with me in it.
I'll have some nice pics over the weekend, if anyone is going to the Year One show at Road Atlanta this weekend, stop by and check it out.
Tony
Specs:
2005 Corvette Z51, 6-spd manual
230/230 .591/.591 114 CompCam, valvesprings, pushrods
LG Motorsports longtube headers with X-pipe (no cats)
Magnaflow catback system
Magna Charger supercharger with 42# injectors, low boost pulley.
stock shortblock, stock unported heads, stock fuel pump with Magnavolt booster.
The big pulley on this blower made a whopping 5.0 psi boost. Sounds somewhat low, but its safe I suppose. This one has a 3.4" pulley on it right now, I had a 2.90" pulley on my previous Magnacharger car.
Mustang Chassis Dyno, tuned with wideband O2 and HP Tuners:
509.88 rwhp, 456.56 ft-lbs
This Mustang Dyno is about 8-10% lower in numbers compared to the typical Dynojet brand dyno numbers. For comparison's sake, that means between 550-560 rwhp via Dynojet.
Not bad for only 5 psi and a safe A/F tune!
The torque line is amazing on this setup. At only 3K rpm, it hits over 400 ft-lbs (432-440 Dynojet) and goes nearly straight across the entire powerband.
Needless to say, this car feels completely different than before. I did some ~ahem~ test runs at 2am on a deserted backroad at 140 mph and it was scary fast. Raceweight is around 3385 with me in it.
I'll have some nice pics over the weekend, if anyone is going to the Year One show at Road Atlanta this weekend, stop by and check it out.
Tony
04-20-2006, 09:23 AM
#3
LS1TECH Sponsor
iTrader: (7)
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 628
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
.... With Tony's permission I'll see if I can get them out there.
Originally Posted by Tiago
awesome results. Bad *** car Tony. Care to Post Dyno sheet?
Eric was telling me it ran amazing
Eric was telling me it ran amazing
Trending Topics
04-20-2006, 10:15 AM
#9
LS1TECH Sponsor
iTrader: (7)
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 628
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
.... Keith -
I cant thank you enough for the quick heads up on that MAF problem we had. Your help is greatly appriciated. Tony you said the same thing I did my scanner at work is not that good either. If you dont post it before you leave Ill post it.
Eric
I cant thank you enough for the quick heads up on that MAF problem we had. Your help is greatly appriciated. Tony you said the same thing I did my scanner at work is not that good either. If you dont post it before you leave Ill post it.
Eric
Originally Posted by Magnus
Looks good Tony! 
04-20-2006, 10:32 AM
#12
69 was much slower, heavier, less aerodynamic. It was also louder. This car still has that refined Corvette feeling, but moves out hard.
I doubt I can run track times like the '69 though, hard to cut 1.4x 60' times in a Vette without breaking stuff.
I doubt I can run track times like the '69 though, hard to cut 1.4x 60' times in a Vette without breaking stuff.
