Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

TPiS ZL11X Cam

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-03-2006, 09:45 PM
  #1  
Teching In
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
SySt666's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default TPiS ZL11X Cam

Has anyone tried this cam? It's the "biggest" cam TPiS sells without requiring fly-cutting the pistons. My setup will include a stock 2002 LS6 shortblock with Manley springs/retainers, 5.3L heads and I am looking to use this cam. What kind of power can I expect with the associated external "bolt-ons"? I am kinda thinking upwards of 450HP at the flywheel.
Old 05-04-2006, 12:03 AM
  #2  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (27)
 
SVT THIS's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Owasso, Ok
Posts: 2,238
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

What size valves are in the 5.3 heads? If they are larger than stock you might have to flycut. I don't know what the specs are on that cam, but if its similar in size to the MS3, TRex, X3 I'd say with heads you could see close to that.
Old 05-04-2006, 01:11 AM
  #3  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (11)
 
Jake the SSnake's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Iowa
Posts: 529
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Full bolt-ons should get you around 400 at the flywheel.With bolt-ons ,heads,and cam it would be almost impossible to get less than 450 at the flywheel.Most people go by rwhp thats a little bit more challenging to get 450 rwhp,but has been done many times.
Old 05-04-2006, 01:13 AM
  #4  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (27)
 
SVT THIS's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Owasso, Ok
Posts: 2,238
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Wow I didn't see the at the flywheel part. You should see that pretty easily-I'd be more worried about RWHP than flywheel hp though.
Old 05-04-2006, 01:26 AM
  #5  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (11)
 
Jake the SSnake's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Iowa
Posts: 529
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by SVT THIS
Wow I didn't see the at the flywheel part. You should see that pretty easily-I'd be more worried about RWHP than flywheel hp though.
For some reason T.P.I.S measures everything at the flywheel.Heres the spec for the ZL-11X Cam duration @ .050 220/224 lift is .557/.578. Kinda small but it should get 450@ the flywheel
Old 05-04-2006, 06:30 AM
  #6  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (11)
 
No Juice's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Minnesota Corn Fields
Posts: 2,451
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 8 Posts

Default

There is a guy on here with that cam and ported LS6 heads that did 414rwhp. I think his screan name is triumphman
Old 05-04-2006, 12:01 PM
  #7  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (27)
 
SVT THIS's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Owasso, Ok
Posts: 2,238
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Those are some impressive numbers for "baby" cam.

Last edited by SVT THIS; 05-04-2006 at 11:46 PM.
Old 05-04-2006, 12:08 PM
  #8  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (11)
 
No Juice's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Minnesota Corn Fields
Posts: 2,451
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 8 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Jake the SSnake
For some reason T.P.I.S measures everything at the flywheel.Heres the spec for the ZL-11X Cam duration @ .050 220/224 lift is .557/.578. Kinda small but it should get 450@ the flywheel

TPIS rates everything at the flywheel becuase one its more accurate and two they have an engine dyno in their shop
Old 05-04-2006, 02:27 PM
  #9  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
bmfcamaro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,143
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

i would go with the tr224 cam. they are way more reputable. many people on here running them. solid dyno numbers.
Old 05-04-2006, 09:12 PM
  #10  
Teching In
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
SySt666's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Will the TR224 work without flycutting my pistons along with my 61cc 5.3L heads? Whats the max lift on the TR224 with a 1.7:1 rocker? And BTW, I know guys from TPIS. The ones I know are really good people, they do not rate their numbers in flyhwheel to make them look better. Fact is flywheel hp is far more accurate when comparing the same engines in two different cars. LS1 in a corvette vs LS1 in a camaro.
Old 05-04-2006, 11:46 PM
  #11  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (27)
 
SVT THIS's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Owasso, Ok
Posts: 2,238
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

I think that the 224 should fit w/out flycutting. What size valves do you have in the heads? I had 2.02 and 1.57 valves on a 5.3L head and could fit a 231/237 no prob.

I wasn't trying to bash the guys at TPIS. I haven't ever heard of them and was just making an assumption. I edited my post
Old 05-05-2006, 12:13 AM
  #12  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (11)
 
Jake the SSnake's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Iowa
Posts: 529
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

They practically pioneered gm efi performance like back in the late 80's I think.There intake design (miniram) was just about copied by gm on the lt1.There developments to the tpi motor were second to none.They just don't seem to be as popular in the lsx world.Although they do have some pretty cool things for the lsx.
Old 05-05-2006, 12:15 AM
  #13  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
bmfcamaro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,143
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

they have been left in the 80's. the tr224 cam will work without flycutting. i am running it with stage 2 heads. its a great cam. tpis is a good company, but they just dont hang in the lsx world.




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:28 PM.