Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

N/a Or Turbo

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-04-2006, 08:08 AM
  #1  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
 
blown2kss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Milwaukee WI
Posts: 180
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default N/a Or Turbo

I have an 01 zo6, and am looking to make this vette run. But I am not sure which way to go to make my power. I would like to do this spending the least amount of money, but still be reliable.

My choices are either all motor 427 making about 600rwhp, and a 200+ shot of nitrous. Or the other option would be with forged internals on a 346 (maybe 383) with a turbo setup. either way I am looking for 800+ rwhp, but I want to get there with the least amount of money spent.


suggestions.
Old 05-04-2006, 08:15 AM
  #2  
TECH Addict
 
300bhp/ton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: England
Posts: 2,648
Received 13 Likes on 8 Posts

Default

If you don't want to pay don't play, it's that simple.
Old 05-04-2006, 08:17 AM
  #3  
12 Second Club
 
ROJO99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Dayton, Ohio
Posts: 409
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

My vote is with a Turbo set-up. I am being onsided here, due to the fact I am beginning the initail layout of a TT for my 99FRC.
Old 05-04-2006, 08:20 AM
  #4  
Launching!
iTrader: (5)
 
JstALs1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: some where in the Chi
Posts: 213
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

i think that either way you are going to spend alot of money to get 800 plus rwhp but i would say a big turbo and nitrous should get you close.
Old 05-04-2006, 09:05 AM
  #5  
Staging Lane
iTrader: (20)
 
conundrum07's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Overland Park, KS
Posts: 83
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I would go the nitrous route. Building a strong motor to handle 800rwhp and the costs of the turbo kit will cost you more. FI is by no means cheap
Old 05-04-2006, 10:58 AM
  #6  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
 
blown2kss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Milwaukee WI
Posts: 180
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Oh I am familiar with what I will be spending on a stroker motor to get those numbers, but I have not done a lot of research on a turbo setup. I know that I don't need big cubes to get big power from a turbo setup, and I will be doing one or the other.

[QUOTE]300bhp/ton If you don't want to pay don't play, it's that simple

I want to play and I know I have to pay, but figuring out which one costs less is Ideal...
Old 05-04-2006, 11:05 AM
  #7  
TECH Addict
 
300bhp/ton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: England
Posts: 2,648
Received 13 Likes on 8 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by blown2kss
Oh I am familiar with what I will be spending on a stroker motor to get those numbers, but I have not done a lot of research on a turbo setup. I know that I don't need big cubes to get big power from a turbo setup, and I will be doing one or the other.

I want to play and I know I have to pay, but figuring out which one costs less is Ideal...
Well I might be wrong but either setup you have described seems pretty expensive and about on the limit for each setup (compoent dependant).

Do you already have a suitable chassis for such a power plant?

What sort of fuel are you planning on running?

What's the car going to be used for primarily?

600rwhp n/a is going to be one vicious race setup and personally I wouldn't have thought all that street friendly also a 200 shot is not a stroll in the park if you plan on using it regualarily.

A blown 346ci on pump petrol making 800rwhp IMO would be a tall order. Either way you could expect a large bill at the end of a nights use just for maintance and repair.

I would guess the more reliable setup would be a milder one, so maybe large displacement and FI with maybe a little nitrous on top for when you really need that extra 100bhp or so.

Either setup I think the potential cost is going to be rounded up to the nearest couple of thou so if you have that sort of money to play with I can't see it really mattering which is slightly cheaper, surley the best setup for your intended application is the way to go?

Anyhow good luck with your decision
Old 05-04-2006, 11:08 AM
  #8  
Restricted User
iTrader: (9)
 
NOSjohn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 2,692
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I would have to say turbo...but then I'm biased.

We can do a nice twin kit for you, check the site for details. Thanks!
Old 05-04-2006, 11:21 AM
  #9  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (32)
 
ls1mongrel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Lakeland, FL
Posts: 842
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

427 and n20 gets my vote !
Old 05-04-2006, 11:28 AM
  #10  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (3)
 
mike#9's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Apopka, Fl
Posts: 1,197
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

How bout a procharged 402? Just a suggestion.

422 solid roller with some squeeze on it would be badass!!!
Old 05-04-2006, 11:53 AM
  #11  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (8)
 
Xtnct00WS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Sterling VA
Posts: 1,429
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Between the two...I'd say turbo all the way. I love the way they sound!

Last edited by Xtnct00WS6; 05-04-2006 at 11:58 AM.
Old 05-04-2006, 11:57 AM
  #12  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (27)
 
SVT THIS's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Owasso, Ok
Posts: 2,238
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

If you can buy the Z06 and want to go a 427 or turbo route I am going to assume to can dish out the money to do it right. If thats the case, I vote for a forged 402 done right with a set of AFR 245s, a blower cam and a set of turbos with a nice, big intercooler. Oh, don't forget the new rear and tranny. You may or may not need a 200 shot, but it couldn't hurt
Old 05-04-2006, 12:02 PM
  #13  
TECH Regular
iTrader: (3)
 
Red91vette's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Delaware
Posts: 422
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

A built up motor with nitrous will be cheaper, but you'd make more with the turbo set up and it would be more fun, also you never would have to refill the bottle.
Old 05-04-2006, 01:02 PM
  #14  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
 
blown2kss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Milwaukee WI
Posts: 180
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

thanks for the opinions, and after some further research It looks as if N/A is my best bet.

To get a motor built to handle the boost and get a turbo system to support the power will cost far more than a nitrous setup. Either way I look at it to make the big numbers will require race gas, and will be horrible on the street. Either way I make the power there will have to be multiple settings for street and race. I already spoke with multiple engine builders for the 427 route, and 600rwhp isn't difficult. It will cost a few bucks and have a rough idle, as compared to a smoother running turbo setup. Either one at close to 600rwhp will have little traction on street tires, and N/A is noticably louder than a turbo setup.
Old 05-04-2006, 02:07 PM
  #15  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (3)
 
11 Bravo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Republic of Texas
Posts: 3,078
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by blown2kss
thanks for the opinions, and after some further research It looks as if N/A is my best bet.

To get a motor built to handle the boost and get a turbo system to support the power will cost far more than a nitrous setup. Either way I look at it to make the big numbers will require race gas, and will be horrible on the street. Either way I make the power there will have to be multiple settings for street and race. I already spoke with multiple engine builders for the 427 route, and 600rwhp isn't difficult. It will cost a few bucks and have a rough idle, as compared to a smoother running turbo setup. Either one at close to 600rwhp will have little traction on street tires, and N/A is noticably louder than a turbo setup.
Good choice. Nothing wrong with a lumpy idle. The front end will be lighter and the engine easier to work on.
Old 05-04-2006, 02:14 PM
  #16  
11 Second Club
 
HaulinHawk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: tampa fla
Posts: 579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by ls1mongrel
427 and n20 gets my vote !
I second that vote!
Old 05-04-2006, 02:22 PM
  #17  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (4)
 
Boostaholic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Boise, ID
Posts: 2,542
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

If you can afford it - and believe me there is a lot more cost than just a forged bottom end and fancy turbo kit - then do the turbo setup You wont be disapointed if it is done correctly
Old 05-04-2006, 02:23 PM
  #18  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
 
blown2kss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Milwaukee WI
Posts: 180
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

thanks; it will definately have lumpy idle, et heads, just under 12:1 compression, huge cam, and hyd roller. I didn't want a solid roller since I would have to adjust the lash, that and it would cost about 4+k more for just a few extra ponies on pump gas. A shot of nitrous will make up for that.
Old 05-04-2006, 02:46 PM
  #19  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (2)
 
2000 Tran Zam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Ahwatukee, Az
Posts: 2,333
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

If it were me and i was doing it the cost effective way, id say go big cubes and n20.

If you wanna go even further on a budget, I'd stick with a 408, go forged internals and spray a 200-300 shot.

you can get 550 rwhp out of an NA 408, then add a 200 shot and 750 rwhp and 800+ ft/lbs.

408's will be a couple grand cheaper then a 427 I believe.

I personally love my setup though.
Old 05-04-2006, 02:49 PM
  #20  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (27)
 
SVT THIS's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Owasso, Ok
Posts: 2,238
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

I believe anybody would be happy with 800+ hp/tq!
Badass numbers 2000 Tran Zam



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:34 AM.