PCM Diagnostics & Tuning HP Tuners | Holley | Diablo
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

O2 LS1 spark advance versus earlier LS1s

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-16-2006, 09:12 PM
  #1  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
jrnorman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Sugar Land, TX
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default O2 LS1 spark advance versus earlier LS1s

I have an essentially stock O2 Z-28 and using HP Tuner, at WOT at around 4200 rpms and if the spark is much above 20.5 degrees, the KR comes in with enough reduction to get back to about 20.5 degrees. When it hits it often audible sounding like a can full of rocks.

A friend has a highly modified 98 Z-28 with cam, headers, head work, high capacity radiator and 160 thermostat, but stock compression and via HP Tuners he can get 29-30 degrees advance without knock but max power seems to come at 28 degrees.

We have tried everything we can think of to try to get mine higher like larger capacity radiator and 160 thermostat without much luck - at most 1 degree above stock. We are about to come to the conclusion that the advance readout by HP Tuners is somehow on a different basis for 2002.

Does anyone know why we are having this anomaly? Is there a difference in VCMs to account for this?

Also while I am here can anyone tell me if the KR I get from 1500 to 2500 rpms at about 33% throttle and mild acceleration HP Tuners reports large reductions like <4 degrees. But I don't feel a thing or hear anything. I am beginning to think this is a something mechanical like an exhaust rattle or something. The Knock settings are all stock.

Any words of wisdom about that symptom?

Thanks in advance for all your words of wisdom!
Old 05-17-2006, 12:27 AM
  #2  
Moderator
iTrader: (11)
 
jimmyblue's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: East Central Florida
Posts: 12,605
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts

Default

Try looking at misfires, maybe you have a single-cylinder
lean problem or something.

The O2 voltages would be about 900mV, all happy?

Corrupted MAF (ported, K&N spooged. etc.)?

Mentioned cooling mods but not the fan settings.
Old 05-17-2006, 09:20 AM
  #3  
FormerVendor
 
gameover's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 525
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

your timing is on the low side, but i wouldn't call it abnormal. Some engines just won't take the timing others will. Short of tearing down the engine and inspecting everything, i doubt you will find out why (unless you got a bad tank of gas).

Oil contamination/blowby, carbon deposits on pistons, variations in compression ratio, blocked injector, fuel pressure issues, lean fuel mixture, bad gas, crank reluctor wheel moved, head gasket issues etc.

Tuners see this variation between engines quite often and they all have at least one story about "the engine that just wouldn't play by the rules"...

Chris...
Old 05-17-2006, 11:55 AM
  #4  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (10)
 
SSpdDmon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Commerce Twp, MI
Posts: 2,918
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I think it has to to with the cam and 241 head design. I have to run stock timing until about 4800rpm to avoid knock retard. But, with the stall I'm not there that long. This is a bit conservative....it's what I'm running now:

............(.76grams/cyl)..(.80grams/cyl)
3600 rpm - 17.995606.....17.995606
4000 rpm - 17.995606.....17.995606
4400 rpm - 18.500977.....17.995606
4800 rpm - 19.489746.....18.259277
5200 rpm - 21.247559.....20.017090
5600 rpm - 23.247070.....21.752930
6000 rpm - 25.004883.....23.510742
Old 05-17-2006, 12:22 PM
  #5  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
jrnorman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Sugar Land, TX
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

SSpdDmond, your advance is about the same as mine, maybe a degree or so less in places and you have an 2002 so maybe it is a characteristic of the 2002 LS1 or the PCM or some combo.

I don't think I have any problems with O2 sensors or MAF because the car dynos on a Dyno Dynamics at 291 HP (these dynos do not use the spinning drums and generally report 15 to 18% lower numbers than the DynoJets which is consistent with results previously on a DynoJet) and peak torque of 304 with an steady average AFR of 12 from 1500 to 6000 rpms using the Dyno's Wide Band. So the car seems to be performing about as it should but with only around 20 degrees advance at WOT at 5200 which on this near stock car is around 0.7 g/L DYnAir.
Old 05-17-2006, 12:39 PM
  #6  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
jrnorman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Sugar Land, TX
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

jimmyblue

No misfires reported and cylinder balance is 95 on all cylinders, could be a single injector not opening I suppose but the over all AFR is a steady 12 from 1500 to 6000 rpms at WOT.

O2 voltages are pretty steady 930mV during WOT dyno pulls.

MAF is original stock, never modified. Did run a K&N filter for a while but switched back to Fram mainly for convenience.

The fan settings have been lowered to 196 for fan 1 (low speed). This is somewhat higher than I could run them but I have A/C and live in Houston and if I lower it any more driving around town the low speed would never turn off.

For the dyno runs I forced the fans on at high speed and of course there was a big fan flowing into the front of the car, but by the last of 4 pulls the ECT was 194 degs. Ambient temperature was around 84 degrees. That is down considerably from the pulls back in April before the cooling mods the last pull was 216 degs, ambient 81 degs.

Do you see anything abnormal with this?
Old 05-17-2006, 02:12 PM
  #7  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (4)
 
white2001s10's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Fairview Heights Illinois
Posts: 1,851
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

When an engine doesn't play by the rules it generally means something is wrong... usually mechanical.
Do the more obvious checks first. Look for a hot plug or failing injector.

Sometimes it comes down to things like a clogged coolant passage in a headgasket, or a collapsing lifter.
It might take a while to figure out.

Does the engine do this when it's still cold?
How about when the octane is increased?
Old 05-17-2006, 02:58 PM
  #8  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (10)
 
SSpdDmon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Commerce Twp, MI
Posts: 2,918
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by white2001s10
When an engine doesn't play by the rules it generally means something is wrong... usually mechanical.
Do the more obvious checks first. Look for a hot plug or failing injector.

Sometimes it comes down to things like a clogged coolant passage in a headgasket, or a collapsing lifter.
It might take a while to figure out.

Does the engine do this when it's still cold?
How about when the octane is increased?
I live in MI (where it's always cold - don't think we've hit 80* yet this year) and I've been having the same issue since the car had less than 30K miles. There's a reason why our timing tables look so drastically different than the older years. When we have different heads, different cam, different intake, different injectors....I'd expect a different spark curve/graph, wouldn't you? After all, the stock curve/graph can't be that wrong....the 01's/02's are supposed to make more power in stock form according to the numbers. Why would the General pull back the timing so much if there was more in it?

Last edited by SSpdDmon; 05-17-2006 at 03:05 PM.
Old 05-17-2006, 03:12 PM
  #9  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (4)
 
white2001s10's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Fairview Heights Illinois
Posts: 1,851
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by SSpdDmon
When we have different heads, different cam, different intake, different injectors....I'd expect a different spark curve/graph, wouldn't you?
No I wouldn't. They aren't that different.
Old 05-17-2006, 03:22 PM
  #10  
7 Second Club
iTrader: (7)
 
NicD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Chandler, AZ
Posts: 2,722
Received 283 Likes on 187 Posts

Default

It's like every other 01-02 f-body I have ever seen. None of them take much more timing than what they come with from the factory. Chalk it up to different heads/cam or whatever. Looks normal to me.
Old 05-17-2006, 05:08 PM
  #11  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
jrnorman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Sugar Land, TX
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Maybe the question should be broaden to does anyone know of or have a stock or near stock 2002 that can carry more spark advance than about 20 degreess at WOT and around 4200 rpm?

Seems to me that all the replies from other 2002 owners have the same results.
Old 05-17-2006, 05:36 PM
  #12  
TECH Fanatic
 
ringram's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Sunny London, UK
Posts: 1,690
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

When all is said and done the less timing you need the better.
Good heads mean less timing as turbulance etc is maximised, hence the vortec fast burn style of head for GenI etc. You dont need as much timing.
Unless you check on the dyno you wont know if you need or want more or less timing. You can get close but thats all.
Afterall why start burning fuel when the piston is still rising in the bore and slow its rise down if you dont need to? Fuel octane also has an effect along with the rest of the intake and exhaust system.
Old 05-18-2006, 08:53 AM
  #13  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (4)
 
white2001s10's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Fairview Heights Illinois
Posts: 1,851
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

So are you running your car on 87 octane to take full advantage of this?

Originally Posted by ringram
When all is said and done the less timing you need the better.
Good heads mean less timing as turbulance etc is maximised, hence the vortec fast burn style of head for GenI etc. You dont need as much timing.
Unless you check on the dyno you wont know if you need or want more or less timing. You can get close but thats all.
Afterall why start burning fuel when the piston is still rising in the bore and slow its rise down if you dont need to? Fuel octane also has an effect along with the rest of the intake and exhaust system.
Old 05-18-2006, 11:14 AM
  #14  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (10)
 
98redorangeta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: From Ohio now in that state up north
Posts: 948
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I just put over 30* in a 2002 cam only car and never had kr could have probly put more but it want helping the power any so we lowered it back down.
Old 05-18-2006, 11:46 AM
  #15  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (4)
 
white2001s10's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Fairview Heights Illinois
Posts: 1,851
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 98redorangeta
I just put over 30* in a 2002 cam only car and never had kr could have probly put more but it want helping the power any so we lowered it back down.
How were you testing the power output?
Old 05-18-2006, 02:47 PM
  #16  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (10)
 
98redorangeta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: From Ohio now in that state up north
Posts: 948
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by white2001s10
How were you testing the power output?
I had the car on a Dyno
Old 05-18-2006, 03:06 PM
  #17  
TECH Regular
iTrader: (16)
 
fast98's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: michigan
Posts: 483
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

my 98 can't handle more then about 20 at wot if it makes you feel better
Old 05-18-2006, 04:07 PM
  #18  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (4)
 
white2001s10's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Fairview Heights Illinois
Posts: 1,851
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 98redorangeta
I had the car on a Dyno
That's what I thought.
That explains why you saw what you saw with the advance.




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:57 PM.