slicks and transbrake obsolete?
#1
slicks and transbrake obsolete?
with the way guys in our cars are launching the m/t drag radials on a footbrake (1.35-1.40 60' are getting to be more common with some folks here), is a trans brake launch on slicks even worth it anymore?
is there a need for bias ply tires and shocking the driveline ( talking cars looking for 1.3 60' and slower)? here is one of our local "girl" ls1 4L60e racers getting it done on the 28" radials.
http://www.drivelinestudios.com/nbna...alsweb1024.jpg
just wondering what you all thought.
is there a need for bias ply tires and shocking the driveline ( talking cars looking for 1.3 60' and slower)? here is one of our local "girl" ls1 4L60e racers getting it done on the 28" radials.
http://www.drivelinestudios.com/nbna...alsweb1024.jpg
just wondering what you all thought.
#2
Banned
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: FTW, TX
Posts: 2,665
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
i was thinking about this a while back myself. with guys like Wolfe going 7.50s on drag radials, is there really any reason any of us in the 9-12 second range should need a full big *** slick. i mean if they can hook up those cars and run those numbers on a street tire, there is no reason a 9-12 second car should need any more tire than that. hell, even on his 7.5x passes on drag radials Wolfe was still going 5.1x 1/8th miles so its still getting out there pretty hard. i'm setting my car up to run radials and/or a 28x10.5" slick depending on what class it ends up in here locally.
#6
Banned
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: FTW, TX
Posts: 2,665
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
i could see that a 2 step would be advantagious due to the same RPM launch consistancy, making it easier to dial in the suspension etc would be good. when i run on radials i intend on footbraking to whatever rpm and gettin it done. on slicks thats a different story.
Trending Topics
#8
TECH Junkie
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Fort Collins, CO
Posts: 3,726
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Cars with DR's need to hit the tire harder than cars with slicks. DR's are certainly not superior to slicks. Most people with LS1 cars have super craptastic off the shelf converters that are super in-effecient and not what their car needs.
#10
Originally Posted by Ben R
Cars with DR's need to hit the tire harder than cars with slicks. DR's are certainly not superior to slicks. Most people with LS1 cars have super craptastic off the shelf converters that are super in-effecient and not what their car needs.
what does converter efficiency have to do with hwo well the car launches on slicks versus DRs?
#11
Originally Posted by badass 2002 z28
My car leaves better off a footbrake than a trans brake. It 60fts about the same with both, but overall the suspension works better footbraking.
#12
TECH Junkie
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Fort Collins, CO
Posts: 3,726
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by gator's 99TA
you dont mean "shock" the tires harder with radials right? do you mean cars with radials to run the same number must put more power to the ground? i am confused.
what does converter efficiency have to do with hwo well the car launches on slicks versus DRs?
what does converter efficiency have to do with hwo well the car launches on slicks versus DRs?
Converter effeciency is a trate of the crappy converters I was trying to describe. It really have TOO much bearing on how a car launches, but it does matter. Speaking of converter effeciency I have a racepak graph from a Nostalgia Pro Street racer who saw 1:1 through the lights. Pretty neat stuff.
#13
TECH Resident
Join Date: May 2005
Location: 8000DA Land
Posts: 983
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
So, a Drag Radial will hook as fine as a Slick if the Suspension is prepared to.
a Slick would hook on "any" suspension setup...
Kinda like that?
325/50/15s vs Stiff Slicks... ( slicks are cheaper! )
a Slick would hook on "any" suspension setup...
Kinda like that?
325/50/15s vs Stiff Slicks... ( slicks are cheaper! )
#14
LS1Tech Sponsor
iTrader: (4)
Originally Posted by gator's 99TA
i remember joe overton saying the same thing about his car as well.
I agree with Ben. With a drag radial you need to shock the tire. The harder the shock the better the hook if you can control it. If you set the car up correctly a trans brake will out launch a footbrake car.
#16
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Chicago
Posts: 674
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by skipperbisket
i was thinking about this a while back myself. with guys like Wolfe going 7.50s on drag radials, is there really any reason any of us in the 9-12 second range should need a full big *** slick. i mean if they can hook up those cars and run those numbers on a street tire, there is no reason a 9-12 second car should need any more tire than that. hell, even on his 7.5x passes on drag radials Wolfe was still going 5.1x 1/8th miles so its still getting out there pretty hard. i'm setting my car up to run radials and/or a 28x10.5" slick depending on what class it ends up in here locally.
The difference here is the guys runnin these 7.5's on a DR are making HUGE power and are in a "controlled" spin most of the time
#18
Originally Posted by Coach 02 A3 Z/28
This statement is my car to a T.
Coach
Coach
coach you dont run a transbrake? that really surprises me with you into braket racing so much. esp with how much madman pushes the tb. i figured the footbrake woudl slow your r/t
#19
LS1Tech Sponsor
iTrader: (4)
Originally Posted by gator's 99TA
coach you dont run a transbrake? that really surprises me with you into braket racing so much. esp with how much madman pushes the tb. i figured the footbrake woudl slow your r/t
#20
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (10)
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Deerfield Beach, FL
Posts: 3,672
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by gator's 99TA
coach you dont run a transbrake? that really surprises me with you into braket racing so much. esp with how much madman pushes the tb. i figured the footbrake woudl slow your r/t