Drag Racing Tech
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

slicks and transbrake obsolete?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-18-2006, 10:44 PM
  #1  
TECH Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
gator's 99TA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Tampa Bay
Posts: 9,971
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default slicks and transbrake obsolete?

with the way guys in our cars are launching the m/t drag radials on a footbrake (1.35-1.40 60' are getting to be more common with some folks here), is a trans brake launch on slicks even worth it anymore?

is there a need for bias ply tires and shocking the driveline ( talking cars looking for 1.3 60' and slower)? here is one of our local "girl" ls1 4L60e racers getting it done on the 28" radials.

http://www.drivelinestudios.com/nbna...alsweb1024.jpg

just wondering what you all thought.
Old 05-18-2006, 10:50 PM
  #2  
Banned
iTrader: (4)
 
skipperbisket's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: FTW, TX
Posts: 2,665
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

i was thinking about this a while back myself. with guys like Wolfe going 7.50s on drag radials, is there really any reason any of us in the 9-12 second range should need a full big *** slick. i mean if they can hook up those cars and run those numbers on a street tire, there is no reason a 9-12 second car should need any more tire than that. hell, even on his 7.5x passes on drag radials Wolfe was still going 5.1x 1/8th miles so its still getting out there pretty hard. i'm setting my car up to run radials and/or a 28x10.5" slick depending on what class it ends up in here locally.
Old 05-18-2006, 11:05 PM
  #3  
TECH Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
gator's 99TA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Tampa Bay
Posts: 9,971
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

well i dont want to compare the 7 second radial tire cars b/c they are running a 30" 315 drag radial. lets keep the discussion to 9 second and slower cars. basically the vast majority of drag cars on this board running a 28" tire.
Old 05-18-2006, 11:07 PM
  #4  
Banned
iTrader: (4)
 
skipperbisket's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: FTW, TX
Posts: 2,665
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

i was just using that as an example, basically if a 7.5 second car can get it done on a radial, i see no reason that an 8-12 second car can't do the same.
Old 05-18-2006, 11:10 PM
  #5  
TECH Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
gator's 99TA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Tampa Bay
Posts: 9,971
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

it just seems so much more simple. no trans brake. no 2 step. no anything. just put in 20 psi in the tires and footbrake it. bam, 1.3-1.4 60' times.
Old 05-18-2006, 11:16 PM
  #6  
Banned
iTrader: (4)
 
skipperbisket's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: FTW, TX
Posts: 2,665
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

i could see that a 2 step would be advantagious due to the same RPM launch consistancy, making it easier to dial in the suspension etc would be good. when i run on radials i intend on footbraking to whatever rpm and gettin it done. on slicks thats a different story.
Old 05-18-2006, 11:19 PM
  #7  
TECH Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
gator's 99TA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Tampa Bay
Posts: 9,971
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

ok, so definately reaction time is an advantage along with consistency. but to me it also seems like a slick/TB is more things that could go wrong (over complicating things). again talking 9-12 second cars here.
Old 05-18-2006, 11:22 PM
  #8  
TECH Junkie
 
Ben R's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Fort Collins, CO
Posts: 3,726
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Cars with DR's need to hit the tire harder than cars with slicks. DR's are certainly not superior to slicks. Most people with LS1 cars have super craptastic off the shelf converters that are super in-effecient and not what their car needs.
Old 05-18-2006, 11:25 PM
  #9  
9 Second Club
iTrader: (5)
 
badass 2002 z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: St. Louis, MO
Posts: 1,300
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

My car leaves better off a footbrake than a trans brake. It 60fts about the same with both, but overall the suspension works better footbraking.
Old 05-18-2006, 11:27 PM
  #10  
TECH Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
gator's 99TA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Tampa Bay
Posts: 9,971
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Ben R
Cars with DR's need to hit the tire harder than cars with slicks. DR's are certainly not superior to slicks. Most people with LS1 cars have super craptastic off the shelf converters that are super in-effecient and not what their car needs.
you dont mean "shock" the tires harder with radials right? do you mean cars with radials to run the same number must put more power to the ground? i am confused.

what does converter efficiency have to do with hwo well the car launches on slicks versus DRs?
Old 05-18-2006, 11:28 PM
  #11  
TECH Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
gator's 99TA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Tampa Bay
Posts: 9,971
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by badass 2002 z28
My car leaves better off a footbrake than a trans brake. It 60fts about the same with both, but overall the suspension works better footbraking.
i remember joe overton saying the same thing about his car as well.
Old 05-18-2006, 11:54 PM
  #12  
TECH Junkie
 
Ben R's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Fort Collins, CO
Posts: 3,726
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by gator's 99TA
you dont mean "shock" the tires harder with radials right? do you mean cars with radials to run the same number must put more power to the ground? i am confused.

what does converter efficiency have to do with hwo well the car launches on slicks versus DRs?
Running DR's is a complicated mix. They're a lot less forgiving than slicks are. If I built a DR car it would definately hit the tires hard. The hard part is keeping them planted.

Converter effeciency is a trate of the crappy converters I was trying to describe. It really have TOO much bearing on how a car launches, but it does matter. Speaking of converter effeciency I have a racepak graph from a Nostalgia Pro Street racer who saw 1:1 through the lights. Pretty neat stuff.
Old 05-19-2006, 12:10 AM
  #13  
LC
TECH Resident
 
LC's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: 8000DA Land
Posts: 983
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

So, a Drag Radial will hook as fine as a Slick if the Suspension is prepared to.
a Slick would hook on "any" suspension setup...

Kinda like that?

325/50/15s vs Stiff Slicks... ( slicks are cheaper! )
Old 05-19-2006, 07:36 AM
  #14  
LS1Tech Sponsor
iTrader: (4)
 
MADMAN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: At the track
Posts: 5,295
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by gator's 99TA
i remember joe overton saying the same thing about his car as well.
Joe O was scared of his trans brake.

I agree with Ben. With a drag radial you need to shock the tire. The harder the shock the better the hook if you can control it. If you set the car up correctly a trans brake will out launch a footbrake car.
__________________
www.madmanandcoracing.com


225-343-9029
Old 05-19-2006, 07:38 AM
  #15  
"The Drag Racing Director"
iTrader: (10)
 
Coach 02 A3 Z/28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Tomball, TX.
Posts: 7,538
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by gator's 99TA
it just seems so much more simple. no trans brake. no 2 step. no anything. just put in 20 psi in the tires and footbrake it. bam, 1.3-1.4 60' times.

This statement is my car to a T.

Coach
Old 05-19-2006, 08:29 AM
  #16  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (2)
 
Carbed4thGen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Chicago
Posts: 674
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by skipperbisket
i was thinking about this a while back myself. with guys like Wolfe going 7.50s on drag radials, is there really any reason any of us in the 9-12 second range should need a full big *** slick. i mean if they can hook up those cars and run those numbers on a street tire, there is no reason a 9-12 second car should need any more tire than that. hell, even on his 7.5x passes on drag radials Wolfe was still going 5.1x 1/8th miles so its still getting out there pretty hard. i'm setting my car up to run radials and/or a 28x10.5" slick depending on what class it ends up in here locally.

The difference here is the guys runnin these 7.5's on a DR are making HUGE power and are in a "controlled" spin most of the time
Old 05-19-2006, 08:57 AM
  #17  
Retired Street Racer
iTrader: (49)
 
Matt D's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Southside
Posts: 7,318
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

I do not use a transbrake or 2 step, but I do use a proportioning valve so I can foot brake my 4600 converter higher with the MT drag radials. You might want to look into one of those John.
Old 05-19-2006, 09:29 AM
  #18  
TECH Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
gator's 99TA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Tampa Bay
Posts: 9,971
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Coach 02 A3 Z/28
This statement is my car to a T.

Coach

coach you dont run a transbrake? that really surprises me with you into braket racing so much. esp with how much madman pushes the tb. i figured the footbrake woudl slow your r/t
Old 05-19-2006, 09:51 AM
  #19  
LS1Tech Sponsor
iTrader: (4)
 
MADMAN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: At the track
Posts: 5,295
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by gator's 99TA
coach you dont run a transbrake? that really surprises me with you into braket racing so much. esp with how much madman pushes the tb. i figured the footbrake woudl slow your r/t
Coach runs a No Electronics class. So we cant have a trans brake. He does have worse reaction times on a .400 pro tree on the foot brake.
__________________
www.madmanandcoracing.com


225-343-9029
Old 05-19-2006, 09:59 AM
  #20  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (10)
 
Loudmouth LS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Deerfield Beach, FL
Posts: 3,672
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by gator's 99TA
coach you dont run a transbrake? that really surprises me with you into braket racing so much. esp with how much madman pushes the tb. i figured the footbrake woudl slow your r/t
If I remember correctly, he runs the footbrake class, that's why no tbrake. If you run a tbrake, you have to run with the guys with all sorts of electronics like delay boxes and all that **** and it makes it a lot harder to win.


Quick Reply: slicks and transbrake obsolete?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:55 AM.