XtinctZ28

iTrader: (57)

Well someone just removed my current sig pic.

Please tell me, how is it that a picture made up from multiple pictures that is nothing more than a piece of graphic art, that shows NO Nudity, NO parts of the body except legs, NOT anything except the back of two legs (NO *** or anything) and a pair of underwear from an entirely different picture (Which here in America is the same amount of clothing as a bikini and this picture has actually been posted here without a NWS tag) is considered NWS.

First of all if is is a question of offending someone then **** it, I am offended by BLACK cars please remove all pictures immediately. Thanks.

Second, where are the rules posted about what is work safe and what is not so that I can see the rules that allow pics of girls in many different stages of undress in some peoples avatars and sigs but not others.

Just curious.

orangeapeel

iTrader: (18)

You don't have to be an *** about it. If you have read the new member stuff it probably explains it in there pretty clearly.

XtinctZ28

iTrader: (57)

Please dont get me wrong, I am not trying to be an *** at all.

I am just confused. I specifically made the picture to not have any part of a womans body that could not be shown in public. I just did not see anything against that in the rules.

It is not that big of deal I know it is just a sig picture. Can I get approval on one BEFORE I use it just to be safe? That would help me out alot.

This is the one I would like to use if possible:



Would this one be OK?

K I L O

iTrader: (5)

:off topic: Make me one like the one that got removed from your sig! it was badass

Super Speed

iTrader: (8)

PM me your old one

~JOSHUA

iTrader: (92)

I remember staring at it for at least two minutes one time. Nice....


It wasn't bad per say, but it could get some people in trouble depending on where somebody worked and what manager saw it. Too bad though, it was pretty cool.

1gen

iTrader: (1)

so I'd like that pm too thanks

Nautilus

iTrader: (15)

Or you could try looking at his cardomain site

unit213

I deleted it. Quit crying.

The one you posted isn't acceptable by any means.
Try something like this, which is what the other 60,000 members
have:

XtinctZ28

iTrader: (57)

Thanks Guys! I was so proud of that pic!....Oh, Well...

All my sigs are on page 4 of my cardomain site.

Unit213 - I'm not really crying persay, just venting. If you are saying that all 60,000 other members have NO girls in bikinis in the sig then I would just have my car shown and be done with it. However. I got the idea from seeing many sigs on this forum so we both know that is not true.

So the rule is NO girls allowed in sigs then correct? Cool, my sig will be just a car and my screenname to keep the peace.

Sig changed isn't that what you desired sir?

unit213

That sig pic looks badass! It's not like I disliked the other one. It was solid...no
question about that. It's just inappropriate.

I deleted multiple sig pics today that were similiar or worse than yours. It's hard
to police every forum, every member, etc...so I just zap them when I see them.
It definitely wasn't a personal attack by any means.

XtinctZ28

iTrader: (57)

Thats cool, I know you have a job to do and I am not trying to be an ******* I was just frustrated.

It makes me feel better that it isnt just me.

Later.

unit213

All's good in the world of LS1Tech.

Locked.