Midwestern Members IA, IL, IN , KY, MI, MN, MO, NE, OH, WI, KS, OK

slp headers

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-19-2006, 06:11 PM
  #1  
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
 
drohm6's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 80
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default slp headers

i called today and talked to slp, they said that the headers with the O2 hook up in them might still set my check eng. light off, should i just go with no O2 headers and get a O2 simulator? or will somthing eles turn it on?
Old 06-19-2006, 06:15 PM
  #2  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (6)
 
Luna's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Highland, Indiana
Posts: 3,185
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

You still need your front O2's and it is kind of a crap shoot as to whether or not it will set a code.

But do yourself a favor, and don't buy SLP headers
Old 06-19-2006, 06:23 PM
  #3  
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
 
drohm6's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 80
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

why should i not buy slp headers? everything i have upgraded has been slp
Old 06-19-2006, 06:40 PM
  #4  
TECH Resident
 
Cephiros's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: chicago burbs
Posts: 809
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by drohm6
why should i not buy slp headers? everything i have upgraded has been slp
they have the worst ground clearance issues of all headers.
Old 06-19-2006, 06:49 PM
  #5  
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
 
drohm6's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 80
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

is that it, becuase there really arent any hills or anything were i live, and i have a ws6 conv. so i have an extra inch then a t/a without the ws6
Old 06-19-2006, 07:18 PM
  #6  
TECH Resident
 
Cephiros's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: chicago burbs
Posts: 809
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

you loose ALOT of clearance there are better ones to use, but if your insistant on slp headers, to my knowlege, thats the only problem
Old 06-19-2006, 07:51 PM
  #7  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (6)
 
Luna's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Highland, Indiana
Posts: 3,185
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

They are also pretty difficult to install
Old 06-19-2006, 07:52 PM
  #8  
TECH Resident
 
Cephiros's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: chicago burbs
Posts: 809
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Luna
They are also pretty difficult to install
moreso than any other LT header?
Old 06-19-2006, 08:00 PM
  #9  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (4)
 
SSPEEDY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 535
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by drohm6
why should i not buy slp headers? everything i have upgraded has been slp
I have them and actually feel depressed every time i look under my car. Please look for a different brand.

I'm not a fan at all of SLP, from the crappy SS hood paint on my car, to their headers and all the rest of the stuff they sell. Don't be one of these people that think because you're using SLP parts that it's keeping your car factory or exclusive in any way. Look elsewhere!
Old 06-19-2006, 11:18 PM
  #10  
TECH Resident
 
Cephiros's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: chicago burbs
Posts: 809
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by SSPEEDY
I have them and actually feel depressed every time i look under my car. Please look for a different brand.

I'm not a fan at all of SLP, from the crappy SS hood paint on my car, to their headers and all the rest of the stuff they sell. Don't be one of these people that think because you're using SLP parts that it's keeping your car factory or exclusive in any way. Look elsewhere!
they have the nicest fit and finish airlid.
...that is all, there are higher quality and cheaper alternatives to everything else im pretty sure
Old 06-20-2006, 12:31 AM
  #11  
On The Tree
iTrader: (1)
 
Blackss99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 114
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

My hooker's fit tight easy install and cost less and they didn't throw codes!
Old 06-20-2006, 12:38 AM
  #12  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (6)
 
Luna's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Highland, Indiana
Posts: 3,185
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Cephiros
moreso than any other LT header?
Well I helped my buddy remove his SLP LTs because he hated the ground clearance they DIDNT have. We had to lift the motor to get the passengers side out, they are HUGE headers. Much bigger than they need to be, and they just SUCK in general.

Please please don't put another set of these crappy headers into an F-Body

Just do pacesetters like everyone else, be happy, save money and ground clearance, and call it a day
Old 06-20-2006, 04:50 AM
  #13  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (22)
 
xxtheonlyxx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Posts: 225
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Luna
Please please don't put another set of these crappy headers into an F-Body
I have to agree. We are talking about clearance equal to a pack of cigarettes.... only 1 to about 5 inches (based on what kind of springs you have on the car). If you ask me I wouldnt want anything on my car that close to the ground except my tires.
Old 06-20-2006, 08:12 AM
  #14  
'Bird Director
iTrader: (80)
 
y2k_ta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Central Indiana Honors: 4th grade spelling bee contestant
Posts: 12,824
Received 24 Likes on 16 Posts

Default

I'll be the odd one here then....I have SLP LT's on my 'bird and haven't had any ground clearance issues. Sure they hang low, but it hasn't been a problem.

http://www.scottsrides.com/smr00taheaderinstall.html
Old 06-20-2006, 10:22 AM
  #15  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (8)
 
LiquidFire350's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Montgomery, IL
Posts: 1,831
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Luna
Well I helped my buddy remove his SLP LTs because he hated the ground clearance they DIDNT have. We had to lift the motor to get the passengers side out, they are HUGE headers. Much bigger than they need to be, and they just SUCK in general.

Please please don't put another set of these crappy headers into an F-Body

Just do pacesetters like everyone else, be happy, save money and ground clearance, and call it a day
SgtB has SLP LTs, i know he took a picture off them with a coke can under his car to show how much clearance is left, not much, and he said he had to use a pry bar and rock the engine to get them in. ive never had to do that with any set of LTs ive put in

the only real advantage is that they are equal length and stainless steel AND ceramic coated, but for the price and aggerivation, i'd look elsewhere

if your willing to spend that much on headers, i'd suggest either Kooks or QTPs. i have ceramic coated Hooker's and didn't have any problems with ground clearance or installing them
Old 06-20-2006, 02:50 PM
  #16  
12 Second Club
 
LILWS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Waukesha,WI
Posts: 993
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

i've been looking around for headers as well and i've come to set at kooks or qtp's any problems with these they look better than the slp's
Old 06-20-2006, 04:52 PM
  #17  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (4)
 
SSPEEDY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 535
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Yes they are stainless but unlike the stainless that kooks/qtp use. A little known fact SLP uses the lower quality 409 stainless.
Old 06-21-2006, 12:54 AM
  #18  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (22)
 
xxtheonlyxx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Posts: 225
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by LILWS6
i've been looking around for headers as well and i've come to set at kooks or qtp's any problems with these they look better than the slp's
QTP's are great, pricey, but great headers. You may have to wait for them. They have been on backorder since early May, and are just now shipping again.

Last edited by xxtheonlyxx; 06-21-2006 at 02:07 AM.
Old 06-21-2006, 01:26 AM
  #19  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (8)
 
LiquidFire350's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Montgomery, IL
Posts: 1,831
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by SSPEEDY
Yes they are stainless but unlike the stainless that kooks/qtp use. A little known fact SLP uses the lower quality 409 stainless.
can some explain what those numbers mean, like what does 409 stand for?
Old 06-21-2006, 02:12 AM
  #20  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (22)
 
xxtheonlyxx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Posts: 225
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by LiquidFire350
can some explain what those numbers mean, like what does 409 stand for?
Hope this helps

Standard types
The AISI defines the following grades among others:

200 Series—austenitic iron-chromium-nickel-manganese alloys
300 Series—austenitic iron-chromium-nickel alloys
Type 301—highly ductile, for formed products. Also hardens rapidly during mechanical working.
Type 303—Free machining version of 304 via addition of sulfur
Type 304—the most common; the classic 18/8 stainless steel.
Type 316—the next most common; for food and surgical stainless steel uses; Alloy addition of molybdenum prevents specific forms of corrosion. Also known as "marine grade" stainless steel due to its increased ability to resist saltwater corrosion compared to type 304. SS316 is often used for building nuclear reprocessing plants.
400 Series—ferritic and martensitic alloys
Type 408—heat-resistant; poor corrosion resistance; 11% chromium, 8% nickel.
Type 409—cheapest type; used for automobile exhausts; ferritic (iron/chromium only).
Type 410—martensitic (high-strength iron/chromium).
Type 420—"Cutlery Grade" martensitic; similar to the Brearley's original "rustless steel". Also known as "surgical steel".
Type 430—decorative, e.g. for automotive trim; ferritic.
Type 440—a higher grade of cutlery steel, with more carbon in it, which allows for much better edge retention when the steel is heat treated properly.
600 Series—martensitic precipitation hardening alloys
Type 630—most common PH stainless, better known as 17-4; 17% chromium, 4% nickel




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:53 AM.