Forced Induction Superchargers | Turbochargers | Intercoolers

lq4 heads, porting worth the $?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-14-2006, 09:01 AM
  #1  
10 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (37)
 
rufretic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,935
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default lq4 heads, porting worth the $?

I just picked up a nice set of lq4 heads for my supercharger build up. They only have about 2-3K on them and look to be in great shape and are already cleaned up. Is it worth the extra cash to have them ported or should I just put some stronger springs on and bolt them up? I'm not looking to make huge power because I'm keeping my stock bottom end for now. I'm looking for around 550rwhp with a safe tune. I'm going to try using my f14 cam. I'm at around 410rwhp now and am looking at either a d1sc or ysi set-up with a fmic, no meth on pump gas. Do you think that sounds reasonable with the the lq4 heads untouched?
Old 08-14-2006, 10:51 AM
  #2  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (9)
 
TchargedLS1TA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Temple, TX
Posts: 1,648
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

With an F14 cam, I would leave them alone, maybe some good bowl blending, but nothing too radical..
Old 08-14-2006, 06:45 PM
  #3  
Restricted User
iTrader: (1)
 
fenix99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Miami, FL
Posts: 530
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

well if it makes you feel any better, ive read and just finished searching for alot of people using lq4/lq9 heads in their setups---going well over 600rwhp and in most cases untouched and/or just upgraded springs.

im going for the lq9's and just upgrading valve springs and if im bored enough and have some free time ill pull the lil dremel out and port away till my arms fall off lol either way they should produce NICE numbers for you...alot of people also leave them untouched with verry respectable #'s
Old 08-14-2006, 06:47 PM
  #4  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (27)
 
67Firebird455's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Visalia, California
Posts: 2,525
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

I'm having my LQ9's set up right now in Texas by a bud of mine. Just flowed 310cfm @ .580" lift and outrageous velocities. Not bad using a 2.02 valve. Deshrouding the chambers and what not, getting the heads ready to run high horsepower with much less boost.
Old 08-15-2006, 10:39 AM
  #5  
10 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (37)
 
rufretic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,935
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 67Firebird455
I'm having my LQ9's set up right now in Texas by a bud of mine. Just flowed 310cfm @ .580" lift and outrageous velocities. Not bad using a 2.02 valve. Deshrouding the chambers and what not, getting the heads ready to run high horsepower with much less boost.
So the 310 is after porting or did he just clean them up? Either way, sounds like they should work pretty nice.

Thanks for the help guys, I think I might just leave them be until I build up the bottom end.
Old 08-15-2006, 01:28 PM
  #6  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (9)
 
TchargedLS1TA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Temple, TX
Posts: 1,648
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

I think the LQ9s will flow close to the 300 mark with very minimal work.. Hell I did a few sets where I did nothing but bowl blending, polishing the chambers and smoothing out the casting flashes inside the runners and got mine to flow in the 310's.. But with a cam as big as an F14, you want to keep your ports small and smooth, that cam will generate alot of air velocity with a smaller port and give you more low-end power..
Old 08-15-2006, 01:38 PM
  #7  
10 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (37)
 
rufretic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,935
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by TchargedLS1TA
I think the LQ9s will flow close to the 300 mark with very minimal work.. Hell I did a few sets where I did nothing but bowl blending, polishing the chambers and smoothing out the casting flashes inside the runners and got mine to flow in the 310's.. But with a cam as big as an F14, you want to keep your ports small and smooth, that cam will generate alot of air velocity with a smaller port and give you more low-end power..
Thanks for the great info.
Old 08-15-2006, 01:59 PM
  #8  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (27)
 
67Firebird455's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Visalia, California
Posts: 2,525
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

I'll post some pics up in a few minutes... I'm worried about overall velocity and overall flow. My cam isn't giant (only .581 lift) so low-flow #'s make a difference in my application.
Old 08-15-2006, 02:01 PM
  #9  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (27)
 
67Firebird455's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Visalia, California
Posts: 2,525
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default



Old 08-15-2006, 02:07 PM
  #10  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (27)
 
67Firebird455's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Visalia, California
Posts: 2,525
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

BTW - The ports were hit with 220 grit, haven't been scotch brited yet (is that a word? LOL).
Old 08-15-2006, 06:55 PM
  #11  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (27)
 
67Firebird455's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Visalia, California
Posts: 2,525
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by TchargedLS1TA
I think the LQ9s will flow close to the 300 mark with very minimal work.. Hell I did a few sets where I did nothing but bowl blending, polishing the chambers and smoothing out the casting flashes inside the runners and got mine to flow in the 310's.. But with a cam as big as an F14, you want to keep your ports small and smooth, that cam will generate alot of air velocity with a smaller port and give you more low-end power..
I heard the LQ9's flow approx 240 @ .600+ bone stock. I would like to see a set of heads with bowl blending, polished chambers and merely cleaning the casting flashes flow 310. If you could achieve that by simply doing that, why is there a market for "ported" heads "stage-2/stage-3" heads flowing the same amount on a 2.00/1.55" valve (you didn't mention running a larger valve)? Hit me up, I want more information...

Nice website btw...



Quick Reply: lq4 heads, porting worth the $?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:54 AM.