Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

difference in older ls1's??

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-13-2006, 01:01 PM
  #1  
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
 
AMS69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 72
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default difference in older ls1's??

i got a 98 ls1 car with flood damage and was going to put basically a stock rebuild on the engine and put it in my 69 camaro(leaving it fuel inj) but i was hearing that the older heads were not very good. what is the diff? i am not trying to build a race car at all, just a cruiser. also any pics or advice on the change over to th e 69 chassis would be nice as well..............
Old 10-13-2006, 01:13 PM
  #2  
On The Tree
 
speedyss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: edgewater, fl
Posts: 183
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I dont know much about puting in a 69 but i do know that the valve cover bolts on a 98 are perimiter bolt style vs. all the 99 and up stuff being center bolt style.
Old 10-13-2006, 01:47 PM
  #3  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (11)
 
N4cer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Ashland, KY
Posts: 2,526
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

If you aren't building the crap out of it, you'll never notice the difference. It's just a matter of the valve covers. Not an issue.
Old 10-13-2006, 01:59 PM
  #4  
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
 
AMS69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 72
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

so just out of curiosity, they still flow the same?
Old 10-13-2006, 02:01 PM
  #5  
yak
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (15)
 
yak's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: SE Wisco
Posts: 1,393
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by AMS69
so just out of curiosity, they still flow the same?
cloose to but not the same, i'm not totally positive though.
Old 10-13-2006, 02:10 PM
  #6  
Registered User
iTrader: (15)
 
Studytime's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: BTR, La
Posts: 1,363
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

The '98's (806 castings) were a little different. The '98 valves alone don't flow what the later years flow, and the runners are sand cast. The latter years were semi-permanent mold casts. The SPM heads had more accurate ports and had a better surface finish. You're maybe looking at a 10hp MAX difference between the heads. The '98 cars dyno'd lower, but they had more restrictive exhaust manifolds and intakes that didn't flow what the latter years did.

Ben T.
Old 10-13-2006, 02:36 PM
  #7  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (5)
 
jay_99z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Charleston, SC
Posts: 996
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

You hear lots of bad things about the 98's but there are plenty of fast 98's out there so....I wouldn't worry about it at all. Proof is right here....https://ls1tech.com/forums/drag-racing-results/444688-quickest-stock-internals-list-11-80-bump.html

To be honest....the biggest reason I would like a 99+ is that because of the perimeter bolts, the coil packs are all seperate. It makes life a little easier when you are working on it to just pop off the whole rack of coils at once. On a 69 I don't think you will have any problem with "room to work".
Old 10-13-2006, 03:33 PM
  #8  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (4)
 
Phil'sC5vette's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Tampa
Posts: 1,074
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Just our of curiosoty, what did you pay for a flood damaged car ?
would make for a nice track car




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:05 PM.