Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Pistons: forged vs. cast

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-17-2006, 03:54 PM
  #1  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
 
jub jub's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Warner Robins, GA
Posts: 535
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default Pistons: forged vs. cast

Since forged pistons weigh a little more than the cast pistons in the LS engines, does anyone know how much HP loss there will be one over the other?
Old 11-18-2006, 12:50 PM
  #2  
TECH Enthusiast
 
GOaT Cheese's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: San Diego
Posts: 638
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jub jub
Since forged pistons weigh a little more than the cast pistons in the LS engines, does anyone know how much HP loss there will be one over the other?
A heavier piston will not affect overall power output, it will "move" it though. For the first milisecond of piston acceleration there may be a tiny bit more energy consumed compared to a lighter rotating assembly, but it is almost imediately regained in the form of kinetic energy due to fact that it is a heavier rotating mass. You can compare it the same way you would with flywheel weight, a hevier flywheel builds more momentum, and the car will launch better, a lighter flywheel will allow the rpm's to ramp up quicker. I know that with comparing flywheel weights, we are talking about a much a larger mass difference than a few grams for the pistons, but the logic is the same. The heavier rotating assembly will help "carry" you on top end, which makes up for the time lost in acceleration. Remember, we are talking miliseconds here, it's not going to be noticed either way.




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:49 AM.