LT1-LT4 Modifications 1993-97 Gen II Small Block V8

CAM GURU's : please enlighten me...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-19-2006, 07:53 PM
  #1  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
 
hyperzone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: St. Augustine, FL
Posts: 1,162
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default CAM GURU's : please enlighten me...

There is a rebuilt engine ready to go in my car but, I just found out there was a screw up and the wrong cam was put in. I know the very basics of cam numbers and stuff but, I have no clue as to what they equal performance wise (no experience). How big of a difference???

The engine has ported heads, 2.02"/1.60" valves, and 110 lb. springs, 1.5 stamped rockers, and all new stock'ish bottom end. Here's the cam spec's I have:

The cam in it right now:
- 209/214 @ .050
- .490 lift
- 112 lobe center

The cam it was supposed to have:
- 222/232 @ .050
- .501 lift
- 114 lobe center
Old 11-19-2006, 08:42 PM
  #2  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
 
96capricemgr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 11,975
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 12 Posts

Default

I see a lot of scary things in your post. MOST good LT1 heads use 2.00/1.56 valves, bigger is not necessarily better. 110lbs on the seat is not enough to run a decent hydraulic roller cam with that heavy a valve, might be enough for the smaller cam you listed IF the lobes are lazy enough. That cam might be a nice mild cam I ran a ZZ3 cam for a few years at 208/221 .474/.510 112 was nice but left room for improvement even if looking for stock manners.

The second cam with the 114 LSA I would call a mistake too, you want a mellow idle go smaller duration, spreading the lobes to tame a cam is a wonderful way to make crappy power.
Old 11-19-2006, 08:53 PM
  #3  
Internet Mechanic
iTrader: (17)
 
BlackScreaminMachine's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Wallingford CT
Posts: 9,831
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

I am assuming this is supposed to be a N/A set up, a 114 LSA is going to Kill the low end torque. if budget permitting, Id get 1.6 roller rockers, something with a low to mid .500's lift, 220/230 duration on a 112 lift with proper springs and it will be a fun ride.
Old 11-19-2006, 10:20 PM
  #4  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
 
hyperzone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: St. Augustine, FL
Posts: 1,162
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Damn, I'm seeing scary things in YOUR posts... hehe... Well, I'm not quite sure what I'm going to do. I was originally going to make some calls and see if I could work it to get the one I was supposed to have swapped out/in. You make it sound pretty bad,.. Would I be better off looking into something that is more 'tried and true' like a CC305, CC306, GM847? Any recomendation given what I mentioned with the motor and the supporting mods in my sig?

*It is a N/A setup and emissions are not something I'm worried about. I was looking for a HP goal of 340-370.
Old 11-20-2006, 07:38 PM
  #5  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
 
96capricemgr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 11,975
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 12 Posts

Default

Might try 1.7s on that baby cam pushing the lift to .555 or so and upgrade the springs. Would idle amost stock but pull like a freight train if you can hook.

If you buy another cam there are a lot of choices out there IMO something like the 846(not the 847) would be nice for a mild 350/355.

Anything you do though is pretty much going to require different springs and roller rockers would be a good idea, on my old setup I ran ProForms for 40-45K I think and they came out fine so you do not have to spend a lot. If you go aggresssive on the cam and springs though then look at something like the ProMagnums.




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:00 PM.