work in progress

iTrader: (2)

I am putting a 2000 ls1 motor out of a c5 in my truck and thought this might be a good cam since I will want my power lower with the weight of the truck.
HYDRAULIC ROLLER, Good idle, excellent low end torque and mid-range horsepower.1800-4800
212°
221°
.510"
.510"
.300"
.300"
116° Sep
112° Int C/L
-06°BTC 38°ABC /
50.5°BBC -9.5°ATC

work in progress

iTrader: (2)

I know there are plenty of peopleon this board that know the answer to this question.

Raughammer

If you are running stock exhaust manifolds...

But why would you put so much timing on the exhaust?

John

MyLS1Hauls

iTrader: (2)

Personally, I wouldnt use that cam. There is too big of a split between the intake and exhaust durations. Also the LSA is too wide. I'd look into the comp 212/218 114 LSA cam. It also has lift at about .525". See the post in the truck section under my name about a 216/216 XE comp cam in a 5.3L truck. I like to use single pattern cams in LS1, which have the same intake and exhast durations.

work in progress

iTrader: (2)

</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Originally posted by Raughammer:
<strong> But why would you put so much timing on the exhaust?

John </strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Thats why I asked the question? What would be the benefits? What would be a good choice of cam for what I doing?

2001CamaroGuy

iTrader: (6)

I vote the TR 220 on a 114 LSA. Its raited at 1500-6500 RPM but I find it had to believe that it would run that high.

As everyone else said, that seems like a lot of durration on the exhaust to me.