PCM Diagnostics & Tuning HP Tuners | Holley | Diablo
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

MAF question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-15-2006, 09:26 PM
  #1  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
 
tomz240's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 116
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Question MAF question

In slp's web site there is a notation on this maf that it is only recommened for a stock tuned pcm. Mine is definately not a stock tune. Will i have to have it retuned to use this MAF?

http://www.slponline.com/view_product.asp?P=23060
Old 12-15-2006, 09:35 PM
  #2  
LS1TECH Sponsor
iTrader: (2)
 
foff667's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Clermont, FL
Posts: 7,986
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

-yeah
Old 12-15-2006, 09:46 PM
  #3  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
 
tomz240's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 116
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Guy is asking 80 bucks for it. I can get a re-tune for 75 bucks. What would the HP and performance gain be? My TB is stock. IYO is it worth it???
Old 12-15-2006, 09:53 PM
  #4  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (4)
 
pdanrichey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Keller, TX
Posts: 768
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Why would you have to use a stock tune for this new MAF? That doesn't make sense to me, other than the fact that it alone will cause your car to run on the lean side. An above stock tune will typically lean the car out to create some more power. I suppose therein the danger could lie... I probably picked up 15-18rwhp with my tune...just a guess though.
Old 12-16-2006, 01:32 PM
  #5  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (10)
 
wait4me's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: warsaw, in
Posts: 2,961
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

The reason why you should use the stock tune is because that maf has a resistor inline that makes the sensor read a little on the leaner side of fueling.

Most people when they make a performance tune, they lean it out. So, if you have A tune that is leaned out and a maf that makes it even leaner.............. That is not good.

The real thing to do is, Cut out that resister and put in the real maf transfer table for that sensor.

A bigger maf sensor on a stock motor wont make a difference, That is why the leaner mix is needed so then the maf makes it look like it makes you gain power.
Old 12-16-2006, 02:32 PM
  #6  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
 
tomz240's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 116
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Could you elaborate more on what you mean by "The real thing to do is, Cut out that resister and put in the real maf transfer table for that sensor"
Old 12-16-2006, 03:07 PM
  #7  
LS1TECH Sponsor
iTrader: (2)
 
foff667's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Clermont, FL
Posts: 7,986
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

https://ls1tech.com/forums/showthrea...light=resistor
Old 12-16-2006, 07:44 PM
  #8  
Moderator
iTrader: (11)
 
jimmyblue's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: East Central Florida
Posts: 12,605
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts

Default

Don't lie to your motor. Nothing good is likely to come
of it.
Old 12-16-2006, 08:41 PM
  #9  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
 
tomz240's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 116
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

So would you say that since i've had the PCM tuned and i have a stock maf and throttle body that it would be a waste of time changing over to the 85 SLP?
Old 12-16-2006, 08:58 PM
  #10  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (10)
 
wait4me's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: warsaw, in
Posts: 2,961
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Because your current maf is not a restriction yet. 40 more hp then it would be an issue. The engine is only consuming a certain amount of cfm. As long as the throttlebody and maf flow more cfm than the restriction then it is a waste.
Old 12-17-2006, 12:42 AM
  #11  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
 
tomz240's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 116
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Thanks everyone for you input.
Old 12-17-2006, 10:05 AM
  #12  
TECH Enthusiast
 
dynocar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Omaha, NE
Posts: 564
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jimmyblue
Don't lie to your motor. Nothing good is likely to come
of it.
Especially messing with MAFs, trying to fool the VCM by reducing the MAF signal not only leans out the fuel, but also increases timing, amongst other things. Most engines that I tune, after leaning them out often requires reducing the timing.
Old 12-17-2006, 12:55 PM
  #13  
TECH Resident
 
RedWS6 00's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: England UK
Posts: 957
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by jimmyblue
Don't lie to your motor. Nothing good is likely to come
of it.
Humm good point, lying to women gets you into trouble. So lying to a car could also get you in trouble.

The PCM needs sensors, and each sensor should be working right. If you are fittig a sensor to make your car is running leaner, why not just tune it to run leaner and not change the MAF sensor to falsifiy information.

If your current MAF has the same internal diamerter than the aftermarket MAf thne why change? Put it this way, the MAF wont net you more power. You can run the car without MAF and get the same power. Its only a sensor to measure AIR, (one of the main sensors) Just tune the sar with regualr MAF, or perhaps descreen your MAF may net you more airflow, but that debatable, its come up many times, and not seen any facts to say descreening improves performance.

I would say stick with your stock MAF if it works. Invest in a wideband if you havn't already done so, and get the AFR dialed in the way you want it.




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:49 PM.