Forced Induction Superchargers | Turbochargers | Intercoolers

STS Turbo

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-25-2007, 07:36 PM
  #1  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
ja1234mes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default STS Turbo

Hi I have just bought a 2001 Pontiac Transa Am, 100% stock. I was thinking about forced induction and was reading about STS Turbo systems. I was also wondering if it is safe to run 5psi, on a stock engine?
Old 01-25-2007, 07:50 PM
  #2  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (4)
 
99Z28LS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: San Antonio
Posts: 1,886
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

sure would be, going over would require the fuel system and intercooler/meth and a GOOD tune
Old 01-25-2007, 07:51 PM
  #3  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (4)
 
99Z28LS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: San Antonio
Posts: 1,886
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

thats if you wanna run above 5psi obviously. if you have a stock clutch, get a better soon

that was my down fall
Old 01-29-2007, 03:26 AM
  #4  
EPP
FormerVendor
iTrader: (22)
 
EPP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 13,063
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Check out everything we ended up doing on this STS Camaro SS. An ATI ProCharger would of been much easier, as we had many problems with a lot of the parts. Bob
http://www.exoticperformanceplus.com...Car.php?car=32
Old 01-29-2007, 07:39 AM
  #5  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (17)
 
ZL1Killa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: NC - Charlotte area
Posts: 3,747
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

here is also my link to my build on my STS. I do have a racetronix PnP 255 fuel kit and i have 42#injectors

My STS build: https://ls1tech.com/forums/forced-induction/631954-sts-install-pics-stuff.html

they say up to 7psi on the stock block, I'm running 5 and i will probably run 6. but yeh, 5 psi is fine. Its all in the tune
Old 01-29-2007, 08:57 AM
  #6  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (44)
 
XpEdItIoUs's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 1,658
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by ja1234mes
Hi I have just bought a 2001 Pontiac Transa Am, 100% stock. I was thinking about forced induction and was reading about STS Turbo systems. I was also wondering if it is safe to run 5psi, on a stock engine?
Save your money and put a real turbo kit on there. Yes it is safe to run 5 psi with a good tune.
Old 01-29-2007, 02:18 PM
  #7  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (17)
 
ZL1Killa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: NC - Charlotte area
Posts: 3,747
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by XpEdItIoUs
Save your money and put a real turbo kit on there. Yes it is safe to run 5 psi with a good tune.

a REAL turbo kit would be custom. as 99% of the 'kits' have flaws and bullshit in them.

Define REAL. if it makes boost and makes power.... kiss my grits, lol.
Old 01-29-2007, 02:24 PM
  #8  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (14)
 
RooRnZ28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Central California
Posts: 1,392
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

5 psi, no problem.... just get an intercooler, fuel pump, and bigger injectors to go along with it for peace of mind!
Old 01-29-2007, 02:58 PM
  #9  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (4)
 
pdanrichey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Keller, TX
Posts: 768
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by XpEdItIoUs
Save your money and put a real turbo kit on there. Yes it is safe to run 5 psi with a good tune.
Boooo-urns to that my intercooler friend!

It's a pimp kit, you get to keep your A/C, it's emissions legal and the install is by far more simplified than traditional front mounted turbo kits.

5 psi is EASY on mostly stock everything...42# inectors are probably the least you should go, and you need at least a 255lph fuel pump.

Eventually, the stock clutch will go and rear-end depending on your driving habits...but many have had a great deal of success on the 10 bolt. Basically, don't replace it until you break it.

Better valve springs are suggested but not mandatory. It really is about a good solid tune.

STS tested all their stuff on fully stock motors and ran 8psi with no problems. There are people running 7 - 800 HP on the stock bottom ends. The LS1 is a lot stronger than a lot of people give it credit for...
Old 01-29-2007, 03:13 PM
  #10  
Teching In
 
Dave Stubbs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Hey Bob,
I was looking at the SS build you mention above. Sounds like the connecting boots are crap. I saw that you mounted the turbo with a solid hanger as it seemed to sag after some time. Did you remove the rubber exhaust hangers? I just bought the used 3.5" twin intercoolers you were selling on your site and was planning to use them with the STS. Would you recomend replacing all the rubber with a better quality? Sorry if this went off topic
Old 01-29-2007, 03:16 PM
  #11  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (6)
 
98Z28MASS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 2,964
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by pdanrichey
Boooo-urns to that my intercooler friend!

It's a pimp kit, you get to keep your A/C, it's emissions legal and the install is by far more simplified than traditional front mounted turbo kits.

5 psi is EASY on mostly stock everything...42# inectors are probably the least you should go, and you need at least a 255lph fuel pump.

Eventually, the stock clutch will go and rear-end depending on your driving habits...but many have had a great deal of success on the 10 bolt. Basically, don't replace it until you break it.

Better valve springs are suggested but not mandatory. It really is about a good solid tune.

STS tested all their stuff on fully stock motors and ran 8psi with no problems. There are people running 7 - 800 HP on the stock bottom ends. The LS1 is a lot stronger than a lot of people give it credit for...
Agree with everything but 7-800 rwhp on stock bottom ends? Not saying it hasnt happened but any links to this?
Old 01-29-2007, 03:28 PM
  #12  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (21)
 
koolaid_kid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 3,023
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by 98Z28MASS
Agree with everything but 7-800 rwhp on stock bottom ends? Not saying it hasnt happened but any links to this?

All FI kits have issues. The nice thing about the STS kit is the fact that your engine bay remains uncluttered. As mentioned by EPP, there are fitment issues that need to be worked out (but they can be worked out).
You will need more fuel to fully exploit the potential, even at 5 psi. However, an intercooler is not needed.
Old 01-29-2007, 03:52 PM
  #13  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (25)
 
trtturbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Newark, Tx.
Posts: 1,810
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by koolaid_kid

All FI kits have issues. The nice thing about the STS kit is the fact that your engine bay remains uncluttered. As mentioned by EPP, there are fitment issues that need to be worked out (but they can be worked out).
You will need more fuel to fully exploit the potential, even at 5 psi. However, an intercooler is not needed.
If you have ever watced the IATs on a longer run, you will see they are too high. Intercooler is good insurance.
Old 01-29-2007, 03:59 PM
  #14  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (4)
 
pdanrichey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Keller, TX
Posts: 768
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

I can't find the post I do recall a guy putting down over 900hp on stock bottom end. I did not say stock internals...but on the 346ci aluminum block, many guys are putting down some big numbers!
Old 01-29-2007, 08:48 PM
  #15  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (16)
 
Tiger2o69's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: MS
Posts: 2,223
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Usually when people say stock bottom end thats means stock pistons/rods ect... People are putting much more than 900 on the stock block.. Actually the only way I have seen someone kill one of these blocks is with a shitty tune.
Old 01-29-2007, 08:54 PM
  #16  
TECH Enthusiast
 
AnthonyConstant's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 522
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

wow...........
Old 01-29-2007, 09:10 PM
  #17  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (44)
 
XpEdItIoUs's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 1,658
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

My definition of a real kit is a front mounted turbo made by yourself.
Old 01-29-2007, 09:28 PM
  #18  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (4)
 
99Z28LS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: San Antonio
Posts: 1,886
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by XpEdItIoUs
My definition of a real kit is a front mounted turbo made by yourself.
not everyone has the tools or knowledge on how to do that. if i did then i would've done it myself
Old 01-29-2007, 09:33 PM
  #19  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (44)
 
XpEdItIoUs's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 1,658
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Ok sorry, ****.




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:31 AM.