Anyone running 220 @ .050"?
01-29-2007, 11:33 PM
#1
Anyone running 220 @ .050"? I've been trying search for the last couple days, and I can't seem to get it to work. So who has ran one and what was the setup?
XE, XE-R, LSK?
110, 112, 114?
Seems it would make for a great street cam with an efficient high flowing head.
XE, XE-R, LSK?
110, 112, 114?
Seems it would make for a great street cam with an efficient high flowing head.
01-30-2007, 07:18 AM
#2
TECH Fanatic
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Sunny London, UK
Posts: 1,690
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I have a crane 220-224 which is actually a 282-286 on a 114 with 0.551 lift.
Works well. I wouldnt want power much further up the RPM scale. It will pull itself along idling 800rpm in 3rd gear so torque is pretty good.
The fast90 made a big difference. Go for 1.8 rockers to get the lift up and all should be well.
Ive got the 1.8's... just need to fit them.
Works well. I wouldnt want power much further up the RPM scale. It will pull itself along idling 800rpm in 3rd gear so torque is pretty good.
The fast90 made a big difference. Go for 1.8 rockers to get the lift up and all should be well.
Ive got the 1.8's... just need to fit them.
01-30-2007, 10:07 AM
#4
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Fort Wayne, IN
Posts: 3,776
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by PREDATOR-Z
One of my favorites is 220/220, .581/.581 115+0 (stealth I by MTI)
But it can be improved nowadays
But it can be improved nowadays
01-30-2007, 10:20 AM
#5
Originally Posted by PREDATOR-Z
One of my favorites is 220/220, .581/.581 115+0 (stealth I by MTI)
But it can be improved nowadays
But it can be improved nowadays
01-30-2007, 11:00 AM
#6
TECH Senior Member
Well since you have ported heads, meaning you can run thinner gasket and mill, I would work on maximising your SCR/DCR.
Since you are 6 speed, meaning you want it to pull nicely into the rpms I wouldn't touch the LSA/ICL but I would cut it on LSK lobes instead of XE-R to get more under the curve.
@ .050 on paper it would be a 219/219 .632/.632 115+0, but in reality once cut it will be more of a 220.x/220.x
since you're putting heads then changing lifters to cadillac or LS7s would not be an issue.
that thing would make a pretty nice flat curve
Since you are 6 speed, meaning you want it to pull nicely into the rpms I wouldn't touch the LSA/ICL but I would cut it on LSK lobes instead of XE-R to get more under the curve.
@ .050 on paper it would be a 219/219 .632/.632 115+0, but in reality once cut it will be more of a 220.x/220.x
since you're putting heads then changing lifters to cadillac or LS7s would not be an issue.
that thing would make a pretty nice flat curve
01-30-2007, 08:47 PM
#7
How would a 219/223 lsk cam perform on a 110 or 112? I'm thinking it might peak a little to early on a 110, but a 112 + 0 should pull well past the peak for a good shot of low end torque and still have an IVC of 42 for a decent amount of top end.
