Generation IV Internal Engine 2005-2014 LS2 | LS3 | LS7 | L92 | LS9

Help with 6.0 possibilities!!!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-31-2007, 08:57 PM
  #1  
11 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
CMKworm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Kansas City, Missouri
Posts: 398
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Question Help with 6.0 possibilities!!!

Currently have the ls1 in my car and I was thinking of picking up a 6.0 and slowly building it over time to swap in my 99 z. Would this be a better choice than stroking my current motor? Don't know if I'll do a power adder or not. Where is some general info on building one of these motors? Also, I found an escalade motor, is that a good one? Just need some basic info! Thanks!
Old 03-31-2007, 10:01 PM
  #2  
On The Tree
 
garrettpen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 193
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

L92 heads on a 6.0 would be a nice combo
Old 03-31-2007, 10:13 PM
  #3  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (88)
 
the_merv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: The Beach...
Posts: 19,261
Received 63 Likes on 54 Posts

Default

Building that right now..
It's going in a 1995 Z28.
Old 04-01-2007, 04:00 AM
  #4  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (6)
 
IH8FORD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Fuquay Varina, NC
Posts: 952
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by garrettpen
L92 heads on a 6.0 would be a nice combo
l92 heads on a stock 6.0 liter should make about 550 crank horsepower with a mild cam. I am building a 427 6.0 liter iron block with ported l92's.
Old 04-01-2007, 11:38 AM
  #5  
Teching In
 
99Z282NV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Laredo
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

i am probably going to get those l92 they are giving good numbers bad they should be for sale now right
Old 04-04-2007, 06:12 PM
  #6  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (34)
 
00 Freak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Ft. Worth
Posts: 937
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I also just picked up a LQ9 engine, but I think I'm going to keep it stock and install the l92 heads, l76 intake, and a vindicator cam. I just talked to SDPC and the tech guy said everything will bolt up, but would need new rockers for the offset and adapters for the knock and cam sensor.
Old 04-04-2007, 10:24 PM
  #7  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (11)
 
KurtRardin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Montgomery, AL
Posts: 2,148
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Isnt the LQ9 a 377 as opposed to the 364 LS2 and LQ4? I saw that in "how to build high-performance chevy ls1/ls6 V-8s" book. I never heard that before...

Also, the LQ4 and LQ9 are supposed to be like ls1s (meaning all of our sensors will go in no problem like its the same engine only 6.0 and iron)...where as the LS2 needs a wiring harness adapter for certain sensors...?...

I am planning the same deal as CMKworm, and I've had my eyes on the L92 heads for a while. The SLP L92 head kit is bound to be a rip off, because its SLP. Would it be cheaper to buy everything on your own? Like from SDPC? Or is this actually a good deal?

http://www.slponline.com/view_product.asp?P=12293 $2295.95
Old 04-04-2007, 10:54 PM
  #8  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (11)
 
KurtRardin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Montgomery, AL
Posts: 2,148
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

As long as the manifold comes with the fuel rails and injectors, it looks like the SLP kit might not be that bad of a deal, especially considering it comes with a throttle cable style TB, and all the brackets to make it work.
Old 04-05-2007, 06:49 AM
  #9  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (6)
 
IH8FORD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Fuquay Varina, NC
Posts: 952
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

The only difference between the lq9 and lq4 is the compression.
Old 04-05-2007, 06:54 AM
  #10  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (36)
 
davidws6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Kansas
Posts: 747
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Check out this info,

https://ls1tech.com/forums/dynamometer-results-comparisons/687816-new-ported-l92-results-great-numbers.html

Nice numbers for 6.0 displacement
Old 04-05-2007, 02:40 PM
  #11  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (11)
 
KurtRardin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Montgomery, AL
Posts: 2,148
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

I never was for sure about the cubies on a LQ9, 377 is what the book said. But, i've already found a few mistakes in that book. Thanks for the info.
Old 04-06-2007, 12:00 AM
  #12  
Teching In
 
creekboi03's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by CMKworm
Currently have the ls1 in my car and I was thinking of picking up a 6.0 and slowly building it over time to swap in my 99 z. Would this be a better choice than stroking my current motor? Don't know if I'll do a power adder or not. Where is some general info on building one of these motors? Also, I found an escalade motor, is that a good one? Just need some basic info! Thanks!
I'll say it depends on what you want to do with it. I would go with an LQ4 to save money. The only difference is the LQ9(flat) has a higher compression 10:1CR. The LQ4 (dished)has 9.4:1CR.You know we have a truck performance section with alot of great info over there. We won't bite .



Quick Reply: Help with 6.0 possibilities!!!



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:36 AM.