Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

GM Racing Lifters Failed in New Motor

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-26-2007, 08:19 PM
  #1  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
billc5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Toronto
Posts: 148
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default GM Racing Lifters Failed in New Motor

These 2 New GM racing lifters (88958689) were removed from a New LS6 motor , A tickng developed about 100 miles after the install so we pulled it to find out why.

The valve lash was set with 7.30 rods, odd because Linginfelter said that 7.4 rod the stock length would be fine, but we found different and on start up everything was quiet and idled good with AFR, Oil pressure, etc. Motor has exceptional power and there were no clearance issues upon inspection.

The cam install was not straight forward, there was little to no clearance between the lobes and the bearing so insertion was very slow. Cam is a GT2-3 new from Linginfelter.

I think either the CAM is no good or the Lifters are detective. There is no physical damage on the CAM, But if the Cam was made wrong could this be the issue? Also these lifter sleeves are scored as a result.


Last edited by billc5; 04-26-2007 at 08:26 PM.
Old 04-27-2007, 04:03 AM
  #2  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (8)
 
staringback05's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 6,695
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

for some reason id like to say you might have an issue with the bearings....
Old 04-27-2007, 10:35 AM
  #3  
TECH Fanatic
 
Old SStroker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Upstate NY
Posts: 1,979
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by billc5
These 2 New GM racing lifters (88958689) were removed from a New LS6 motor , A tickng developed about 100 miles after the install so we pulled it to find out why.

The valve lash was set with 7.30 rods, odd because Linginfelter said that 7.4 rod the stock length would be fine, but we found different and on start up everything was quiet and idled good with AFR, Oil pressure, etc. Motor has exceptional power and there were no clearance issues upon inspection.

The cam install was not straight forward, there was little to no clearance between the lobes and the bearing so insertion was very slow. Cam is a GT2-3 new from Linginfelter.

I think either the CAM is no good or the Lifters are detective. There is no physical damage on the CAM, But if the Cam was made wrong could this be the issue? Also these lifter sleeves are scored as a result.

What did the Lingenfelter folks say when you asked them about your problems? You did contact them before posting this, right?

Another possiblilty is improper installation.
Old 04-27-2007, 10:37 AM
  #4  
Teching In
iTrader: (1)
 
calie0's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Old 04-27-2007, 11:04 AM
  #5  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
vettenuts's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Little Rhody
Posts: 8,092
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 9 Posts

Default

Are those cracks in the photo? Looks like (if they are) they started at the end of the lifter, have you checked to see if there was contact between the lifter body edge and the cam on the lift ramp? This can be a problem with fully enclosed rollers, but on that cam I wouldn't think so as I seem to think it is fairly mild. The lower photo does seem to indicate some type of impact though.
Old 04-27-2007, 11:12 AM
  #6  
TECH Fanatic
 
SideStep's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,942
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Have you pulled the heads??? Does it look like the piston and valves have made contact???

Old 04-27-2007, 03:09 PM
  #7  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (13)
 
ExceSSive's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Gateway International Raceway
Posts: 1,575
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by SideStep
Have you pulled the heads??? Does it look like the piston and valves have made contact???

I too would check there.
Old 04-27-2007, 05:06 PM
  #8  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (14)
 
GR33N GoblinM6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Utah
Posts: 2,301
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

now is it cracked? are the rollers able to still move or are they pushed into that housing?

any bent pushrods?
Old 04-27-2007, 05:15 PM
  #9  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
billc5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Toronto
Posts: 148
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Heads have to be pulled to get to the lifters and there is no interference with the valves and pistons.

The cam still looks pristine, we inspected every lobe they look perfect.

Lingenfelter said that they had never seen this problem before, in other words they said, Not My Problem and were not interested in talking to the Engine builder.

As far as I know the bores for the lifter in the new block were not tight, upon removal only 2 of the lifters were tight in the bores and they were not like that when installed. Could the alignment of the lifter bores be OFF? How would you check.

This failure is not easy to see by eye!





The rollers are rotating freely like new, there are no impact marks.
Old 04-27-2007, 06:11 PM
  #10  
Launching!
 
exSSer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 270
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I've got those lifters, with about 1000 miles so far. I hope it's your installation idiosynchracies, and not an issue with the lifters.
Old 04-27-2007, 06:50 PM
  #11  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
vettenuts's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Little Rhody
Posts: 8,092
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 9 Posts

Default

At what part of the lifter are these close-up photos taken, at the very bottom? Note the area that looks to have been hit or something, the metal has some compressive plastic deformation.



Also, I know you stated the cam was fine, but in the photo below it sure looks like something hit it. Also, compression and cracking doesn't seem to fit either, cracking is usually the result of a tensile load (Mode I failure). Can you explain the note in the close-up photo, not sure what is meant. It does appear that it might have hit something, which initiated a crack.

Are you running LS6 valve springs?

As a side note, from a design standpoint, that corner looks to be incredibly weak and prone to flex and hence a fatigue failure. This "may" be the root cause of your problem.



Obviously not much help to you, but check the design of the Morel's in this thread:

Morel Photo's

Last edited by vettenuts; 04-27-2007 at 07:11 PM.
Old 04-27-2007, 07:36 PM
  #12  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
billc5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Toronto
Posts: 148
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I have replaced the picture with the area of the closeup marked.

the loading of the lifter is from the bore which has sheared inward to the center. this could also be described as inadequate bearing strength. Note that we were lucky to pull the lifter before a chunk was lost, see on the side view how the cracks have propagated from the edge and almost connected up the barrel in both lifters.

The closeups do not show any impact from the lobe on the lifter and there is no evidence of impact on the lobe.

Fatigue maybe, but these failed almost immediately.

The area that looks whacked is actually a chunk that spalled off, in compression the material will start to pop pieces off were the load is applied, there is demonstrable inward displacement, towards the center, (the thinnest part of the skirt is pushed in) and the cracks are opened on the outside radius and closed on the inside.

Let me know if this answers your question.
Old 04-27-2007, 10:10 PM
  #13  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (2)
 
WKMCD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 3,416
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Mine seem to be fine...no ticking with about 2k miles.

I'll keep an ear open..
Old 04-28-2007, 09:48 AM
  #14  
On The Tree
 
Red99C5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: PNW
Posts: 160
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

It looks like from the close up that the edges where rolled over from dropping them or some sort of impact. I'm not saying this happened inside the motor. Aren't these hardened fairly hard? I'm thinking they got damaged somehow in the manufacturing process before they was even sent for the grinding operation.
Old 04-28-2007, 03:04 PM
  #15  
On The Tree
iTrader: (5)
 
Smitty's '04 GTO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Grand Rapids, Mi.
Posts: 100
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Boy, I sure hate to see this, as I just put a set of these in along with a T.R. cam and Patriot 243's. Did so as a matter of insurance as my thinking was that these were better, stronger, lighter design than the stockers. Mine has less than 100 miles on the combo, so I guess I'll just keep a careful ear to the engine...

Would be interested to hear SDPC's response to this...
Old 04-28-2007, 03:27 PM
  #16  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (3)
 
heavymetals's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Southern Calif.
Posts: 1,590
Received 9 Likes on 9 Posts

Default

Looks like impact cracking from hitting the edge of the lifter hole.

A bigger cam pushes the lifter sideways against the hole with more force.

Think of the lifter as a lever, the cam as the force and the edge of the lifter hole the fulcrum point.

I replaced my LS6 lifters with ones (RHOADS) that had a larger contact area with the hole (shrouded roller) like you show, but I left in the stock cam.

If you will notice, the edges are angled and not flush on the shroud not like the one you show, so it doesn't fulcrum on the hole edge.

The stock lifter has no shroud.

Stock LS6 lifter is at the right.
Attached Thumbnails GM Racing Lifters Failed in New Motor-dsc01194.jpg  

Last edited by heavymetals; 04-28-2007 at 05:10 PM.
Old 04-28-2007, 06:16 PM
  #17  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
vettenuts's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Little Rhody
Posts: 8,092
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 9 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by billc5
I have replaced the picture with the area of the closeup marked.

the loading of the lifter is from the bore which has sheared inward to the center. this could also be described as inadequate bearing strength. Note that we were lucky to pull the lifter before a chunk was lost, see on the side view how the cracks have propagated from the edge and almost connected up the barrel in both lifters.

The closeups do not show any impact from the lobe on the lifter and there is no evidence of impact on the lobe.

Fatigue maybe, but these failed almost immediately.

The area that looks whacked is actually a chunk that spalled off, in compression the material will start to pop pieces off were the load is applied, there is demonstrable inward displacement, towards the center, (the thinnest part of the skirt is pushed in) and the cracks are opened on the outside radius and closed on the inside.

Let me know if this answers your question.
Thanks, yes. Hard with photo's to figure things out. They are very thin where you are having problems. Can you fix the lifter bores or is the block toast?
Old 04-28-2007, 07:32 PM
  #18  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
billc5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Toronto
Posts: 148
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

These were installed with good clearance and then failed after several hours running, I removed them with vice-grips, (my engine builder couldn't remove them he would have never thought to use vice-grips on the new GM Racing Lifters)therefor I should think there was no prior impact, the edges are typical of all the new lifters.

We have to do more investigation on the status of the bores, but I would say at this point they will survive.


Originally Posted by Red99C5
It looks like from the close up that the edges where rolled over from dropping them or some sort of impact. I'm not saying this happened inside the motor. Aren't these hardened fairly hard? I'm thinking they got damaged somehow in the manufacturing process before they was even sent for the grinding operation.
Old 04-29-2007, 01:43 PM
  #19  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
billc5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Toronto
Posts: 148
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Old SStroker
What did the Lingenfelter folks say when you asked them about your problems? You did contact them before posting this, right?

Another possiblilty is improper installation.
I'm wondering why I should contact anyone before posting? What materially changes the content of my post by contacting Lingenfelter before during or after I discover a part failure? A part has failed and there is a picture of the failure.

Please tell us how the skirt of a lifter and specifically 2 out of 16 Brand New Lifters could suffer failure from the hands of the installer? given the evidence of the photographs presented.

I would think that the mode of failure is in the design or the material or in the manufacturing process. The skirts at the failure location are only 0.020" thick. So could the oil pressure between the bore and Lifter reach 2000psi? perhaps someone in the advanced section could tell us as this type of question is not appropriate in that section?
Old 04-29-2007, 01:59 PM
  #20  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (3)
 
heavymetals's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Southern Calif.
Posts: 1,590
Received 9 Likes on 9 Posts

Default

The lifter shroud is going below the hole enterance and getting the sh*t beat out of it.

I surmise that the lifter damage is on the shroud face on the opposite side of the cam rotation.

Yes?

Check the edge of the lifter hole.


Quick Reply: GM Racing Lifters Failed in New Motor



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:40 PM.