Forced Induction Superchargers | Turbochargers | Intercoolers

converted to 2.5" exhaust on my rear mount

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-05-2007, 10:16 PM
  #1  
10 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
Zombie's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 2,498
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts

Default converted to 2.5" exhaust on my rear mount

Just got my exhaust wrapped with the DEI wrap from the manifolds to over the axle. I had previously just had some insulation on the y-pipe.

I also had the exhaust redone to 2.5" piping all the way, 2.5" y-pipe, 2.5" I-pipe to the turbo over the axle. I had my friend fab it in 2.5" so it was easy to route and it also has less overall surface area.

If we assume there is about 20' of total exhaust piping the difference is pretty big.

20' of 3" piping = about 20 square feet of surface area
20' of 2.5" piping = about 13 square feet of surface area

The 2.5" piping he used also had a slightly thicker sidewall.

The results are awesome, the turbo reaches full boost about twice as fast as it was previously, it really hits HARD now. I'm suprised that it is this big of a difference considering my previous y-pipe was insulated.

I don't think the 2.5" will hurt the performance at all, but I'll find out when I take it to the track on wed. It should trap around 130mph at 16psi like it did previously (if the weather isn't too much hotter than before).
Old 05-05-2007, 10:35 PM
  #2  
FormerVendor
 
qqwqeqwrqwqtq's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: WWW.SPEEDINC.COM
Posts: 2,444
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Good idea
Old 05-05-2007, 10:57 PM
  #3  
TECH Regular
iTrader: (8)
 
GoatChs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Far East Bay - Norcal
Posts: 479
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Good to hear! And interesting calculations on the surface area...I hadn't thought about that previously, but it makes sense. I'm currently having my piping fabbed up in 3.00", both compressor and turbine sides. I did worry about creating lag with the 3" but talked at length with another GTO/rear-mount owner that did the same and has had amazing results, so I just went with it over the 2.75" I was leaning toward. Like you, I will be Jet-Hot coating and wrapping the entire hot side as well...need get the turbo in to have the turbine housing done too.

Recently bought one of the new turbo blankets from Jose at forced induction...hoping that all of this will optimze the rear mount efficiency.
Old 05-05-2007, 11:42 PM
  #4  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (14)
 
RooRnZ28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Central California
Posts: 1,392
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

same here, 2.5" piping from header collectors to turbo, but unwrapped..... still spoools fast!
Old 05-06-2007, 12:23 AM
  #5  
TECH Fanatic
 
THE_SUPRA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Keller, Texas
Posts: 1,084
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

is it 3 inch from the factory?
Old 05-06-2007, 10:48 AM
  #6  
10 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
Zombie's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 2,498
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by THE_SUPRA
is it 3 inch from the factory?
The I-pipe is 2.75 on most cars, on some SLP cars it's 3"




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:19 PM.