LS1TECH - Camaro and Firebird Forum Discussion

Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

tr 224 on a 112 or 114 with 4l60e?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-07-2007, 09:07 AM
  #1  
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
 
2002ls1a4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 66
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default tr 224 on a 112 or 114 with 4l60e?
I have decided to get a tr 224, just not sure which lsa would be better with an auto. I have all the usual bolt ons and this will probably be the last thing I do. Any suggestions?
2002ls1a4 is offline  
Reply Like
Old 05-07-2007, 09:56 AM
  #2  
Registered User
iTrader: (15)
 
Studytime's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: BTR, La
Posts: 1,363
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default
Get it on a 112 and you can reduce the amount of RPM you spin your auto to. Could help on transmission longevity.

I would imagine everyone else will just say 114LSA, because after all "auto = 114".
Studytime is offline  
Reply Like
Old 05-07-2007, 11:16 AM
  #3  
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
 
2002ls1a4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 66
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default
why does auto=114lsa? I also have a 3400 1.8str converter if that makes a difference.
2002ls1a4 is offline  
Reply Like
Old 05-07-2007, 12:33 PM
  #4  
Teching In
iTrader: (3)
 
STILL 2 SLOW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Texas
Posts: 38
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default
If you have a converter I would go with the 112. If it was the sock stall I would say the 114 because they are supposed to be able to drive a little better.
STILL 2 SLOW is offline  
Reply Like
Back to Subforum
Generation III Internal Engine
View Next Unread
Problems after head and cam install need help




Advanced Search

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:35 AM.