LT1-LT4 Modifications 1993-97 Gen II Small Block V8

160 thermo vs stocker

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-08-2007, 06:37 AM
  #1  
TECH Addict
Thread Starter
iTrader: (8)
 
Ironxcross's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,063
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default 160 thermo vs stocker

discuss
Old 05-08-2007, 12:21 PM
  #2  
TECH Enthusiast
 
94CamaroZ28SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 517
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

well its simple the 160 Thermo opens at 160 degrees which keeps the engine cooler and is recomended if you use hypertech programmer. i think the stock thermo is 180 Degrees maybe 192 im not sure.
Old 05-08-2007, 12:54 PM
  #3  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Formula350's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Decatur, TN (N-W of Athens)
Posts: 7,564
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Stock is 180. 160 is good if you've got a tune.
Old 05-08-2007, 12:57 PM
  #4  
TECH Fanatic
 
FAD2BLK93's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: POULSBO WA.
Posts: 1,106
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Stock starts to open at 180...fully open at 195
160 t-stat starts at 160...fully open at 175
Old 05-08-2007, 01:48 PM
  #5  
Staging Lane
 
CaramelPleasure's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 91
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Tell Me

If I were to get a 160 tstat do I have to get a tune or is it ok for my car to have it stock.???
Old 05-08-2007, 02:12 PM
  #6  
TECH Fanatic
 
FAD2BLK93's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: POULSBO WA.
Posts: 1,106
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

My first mod was the 160 hypertech t-stat...and I ran it for months with no issues, before I got a PCMFORLESS tune.
Old 05-08-2007, 03:11 PM
  #7  
TECH Addict
Thread Starter
iTrader: (8)
 
Ironxcross's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,063
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

i heard it makes the car run richer, reduces mileage slightly and might not let you pass emissions. any truth to that?
Old 05-08-2007, 03:31 PM
  #8  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (35)
 
StealthFormula's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Skippack, PA
Posts: 4,798
Received 54 Likes on 50 Posts

Default

^^I'm doubting all that I use to have one in my '95 no problems. I wouldnt run one without the computer tuned for it though personally.
Old 05-08-2007, 03:53 PM
  #9  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Formula350's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Decatur, TN (N-W of Athens)
Posts: 7,564
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

You can run any w/o a tune, it's just how WELL it runs. I'm sure it does impact your fuel and combustion enough to make a bit of a difference, but probably not a huge or noticeable one. I wouldn't doubt it having an impact on your emissions though. Whether or not it prevents you from passing, if you previously did, is another story (unless you were borderline).
Old 05-08-2007, 05:37 PM
  #10  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (2)
 
3pnt4maro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Middle Georgia
Posts: 1,719
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

heats up a bit faster if you dont have the tune to get your fans on earlier..or a fan switch..these two should compliment each other..
Old 05-08-2007, 05:58 PM
  #11  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (11)
 
infinitebird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 4,280
Received 46 Likes on 35 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by StealthFormula
^^I'm doubting all that I use to have one in my '95 no problems. I wouldnt run one without the computer tuned for it though personally.
There's nothing in the computer to "tune" for a thermostat. It's purely mechanical. So you don't need a tune for it per se. The tune most people recommend with it is to lower the fan enable temperatures. This is a complimentary thing that can enhance cooling along with the thermostat, but its seperate and not related to the thermostat operation at all.
Old 05-08-2007, 06:03 PM
  #12  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (11)
 
infinitebird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 4,280
Received 46 Likes on 35 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Ironxcross
i heard it makes the car run richer, reduces mileage slightly and might not let you pass emissions. any truth to that?
I don't see any reason why it would run richer, so I call bs on that.

It may reduce gas mileage slightly simply because you will get better mileage with the engine running hotter, but you won't make as much power. I would guess the difference would be very small though.

The emissions thing is kind of the same idea, to pass emissions you need to heat things up enough to warm the cats before the test, I don't see why it would affect that significantly though as long as its been running for a while before the test.

Last edited by infinitebird; 05-08-2007 at 06:09 PM.
Old 05-08-2007, 06:26 PM
  #13  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Formula350's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Decatur, TN (N-W of Athens)
Posts: 7,564
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by infinitebird
but you won't make as much power.

I'll be the first one to chime in and start to correct you.

For starters, you can't tune for the Thermostat itself, but everyone here knows that. You tune for the conditions the lower temperature gives. Cooler air is more dense, and dense air is MUCH better for cars. You get more power, better fuel economy, and much better combustion. The reason why it's not exaclty "good" to run a 160 w/o a tune, is because the computer is under the assumption you're running the stock stat, and it'll still calc out everything with that in mind. You tune it for a 160 and you then get to factor in all those new things. Thats why running a 160 is such a good idea, and why most smart people with a Carb motor (who don't really worry about winter time), run a 160. The reason it's nice to run a hotter stat in winter, is simply to have warmer heat

All those factor into the power, emissions and gas mileage.
Old 05-08-2007, 06:40 PM
  #14  
TECH Addict
Thread Starter
iTrader: (8)
 
Ironxcross's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,063
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

well im confused.

i have the 160 stat with the tune. i havent really noticed a drop off in mileage, it runs cool all the time. i dont know. im still confused as hell.
Old 05-08-2007, 07:43 PM
  #15  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (11)
 
infinitebird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 4,280
Received 46 Likes on 35 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Formula350
Originally Posted by infinitebird
but you won't make as much power.
I'll be the first one to chime in and start to correct you.
You must have misunderstood me, because you just agreed with what I said. I was saying you won't make as much power with higher engine temps, i.e. you will make more power by lowering them, which you can do by installing a 160.

Originally Posted by Formula350
For starters, you can't tune for the Thermostat itself, but everyone here knows that. You tune for the conditions the lower temperature gives. Cooler air is more dense, and dense air is MUCH better for cars. You get more power, better fuel economy, and much better combustion. The reason why it's not exaclty "good" to run a 160 w/o a tune, is because the computer is under the assumption you're running the stock stat, and it'll still calc out everything with that in mind. You tune it for a 160 and you then get to factor in all those new things.
I completely agree that it is "good" to run a 160. As to the notion that you must have a tune or that it's bad to change the thermostat without one, sorry bro but you are wrong here. The computer is not under the "assumption" that you are running any thermostat. As I said it's purely a mechanical part. It has no interaction with the computer. All the computer cares about is the coolant temp. I have tuned a lot of LT1 cars and there is absolutely nothing in the ecu settings (at least that are programable) that has to do with the density of the air or such things that needs to be changed just because of a different temp thermostat. There are a few tables that deal with coolant temp that could possibly be optimized but that's definitely not a necessity. Even with the stock tune the computer will know what settings to use for the temp it's seeing. That's all it cares about. The only thing that may be beneficial other than the fan tems is that you could probably run a few more degrees of timing because of the cooler temps. I'm not saying a tune cannot benefit you. There are many benefits you can get from a tune even on a stock car, but the idea that it is somehow harmful to not have a tune with a 160 thermo is completely false.

The thermo has one function, it opens to allow coolant passage when the specified temperature is reached. It has zero interaction with any electronic components or sensors.

Last edited by infinitebird; 05-08-2007 at 07:50 PM.
Old 05-08-2007, 08:01 PM
  #16  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (8)
 
sdm1234's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Holland Twp/Milford, New Jersey
Posts: 1,420
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by infinitebird
I have tuned a lot of LT1 cars and there is absolutely nothing in the ecu settings (at least that are programable) that has to do with the density of the air or such things that needs to be changed just because of a different temp thermostat. There are a few tables that deal with coolant temp that could possibly be optimized but that's definitely not a necessity.
exactly! having a 160 t-stat without a tune won't damage anything. the computer won;t know the difference. it just won't kick the fans on as early, that's all. and with all these people that say a cooler engine helps with combustion, that's correct ONLY for the air coming in. it's been proven time and time again that only Chevy blocks, optimal heat for most efficient combustion is anywhere is between 190 and 210. there's no arguing that! however, for those saying a cooler temp will make better power, that only applies if the air it's drawing in is hot air around the block. for those running Ram Air and CAI, this doesn't apply to you. for those running stock setups, the cooler block will make the air around it cooler, making the air going into the intake cooler, resulting in denser air, which makes more power due to enriched gasoline mixture. otherwise, with those running Ram Air/CIA setups, the air is drawn directly from the outside, so air inside the engine compartment doesn't affect the air going in the intake. Optimal combustion temp is between 190-210. that's where you'll find the most gain. cooler engine temps only decrease air temps surrounding the block, not the air going through the plenum. so, if you're drawing the surrounding air from around the block, then YES a cooler engine will make a difference. otherwise, no change will result.
Old 05-08-2007, 08:37 PM
  #17  
TECH Addict
Thread Starter
iTrader: (8)
 
Ironxcross's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,063
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

so if you're running a richer mixture, that will reduce your mileage... right? but if you get it tuned for it, wont it sort of cancel out?

so does the 160 stat drop your mileage down?
Old 05-08-2007, 09:13 PM
  #18  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (8)
 
sdm1234's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Holland Twp/Milford, New Jersey
Posts: 1,420
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

running a richer mixture will reduce gas mileage, but a 160 t-stat won't cause that. the PCM tells the car how rich to run. the mixture is not correlated with the coolant temp because the 02 sensors define what air/fuel ratio to run at. you can have 32 degree air entering the intake plenum (very dense air!) which, in-turn, calls for more fuel per air ratio. or you can have 120 degree air (not so dense) which will mean less fuel per air. however, the that doesn't mean a different A/F ratio. you'll always be running 14.1:1 or whatever it's set at. coolant temp doesn't change how rich the mixture (unless your definition of a "rich" mixture is having higher surplus of both air AND fuel together... then yes is will make a "richer" mixture but that's not standard definition..)
Old 05-08-2007, 09:34 PM
  #19  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Formula350's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Decatur, TN (N-W of Athens)
Posts: 7,564
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Of course I know the ECM doesn't have anything to do with the TStat. Thermal Mechanics do.
Just because you've done multiple tunes, doesn't mean you understand. I know I sure don't. Just because something in the ECM doesn't directly relate to the operating temperature, doesn't mean it doesn't effect it. As you said yourself, you could run lower timing since it's not as prone to pre-detonation. I would most certainly consider the VE tables to deal with the temp of the engine. Why? Well because the VE table is dealing with how much air the motor and take in and then exhaust. By knowing that it will adjust the air:fuel ratio. Running a cooler TStat lets the incoming air be cooler. Cooler air is more dense, and denser air means more is getting into the engine. So you adjust the VE tables to account for that increased air density. In a carbed motor, you adjust the appropriate screws. If I understood all the tables in the ECM more, I'm sure I could figure out more related things as well.

To clear up any other misunderstandings, I never thought that changing the TStat would hurt a motor in any way. Only the power and/or gas mileage (and by association the emissions).

EDIT: Typo. Also, forgot to add that cooler intake air temp helps exhaust temp too, which means freer flowing exhaust. (Thats why you use exhaust wrap or splurge for the ceramic coated headers.)

Last edited by Formula350; 05-08-2007 at 09:53 PM.
Old 05-08-2007, 09:52 PM
  #20  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (11)
 
infinitebird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 4,280
Received 46 Likes on 35 Posts

Default

The VE tables might apply to yours (93) but they really aren't used on 94+ MAF cars.

And I wasn't claiming to understand everything, however I do maintain that there is nothing of appreciable significance that needs to be changed just because of a different temp thermo. I think if there was that would be well known by now, but the only thing I ever see recommend is the fan temps, which does help but in another way.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:58 AM.