New TEA/TFS 235cc Flow #'s Check them out
05-12-2007, 07:23 PM
#1
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Arlington Tx
Posts: 1,039
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
New TEA/TFS 235cc Flow #'s Check them out What does everybody think of these heads. They have good intake and good exhaust cfm thru the whole lifts.
Lift intk cfm/exhst cfm
300 235 / 199
400 293 / 244
500 329 / 265
550 341 / 272
600 344 / 276
Lift intk cfm/exhst cfm
300 235 / 199
400 293 / 244
500 329 / 265
550 341 / 272
600 344 / 276
05-12-2007, 08:57 PM
#2
Registered User
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by jeremym
What does everybody think of these heads. They have good intake and good exhaust cfm thru the whole lifts.
Lift intk cfm/exhst cfm
300 235 / 199
400 293 / 244
500 329 / 265
550 341 / 272
600 344 / 276
Lift intk cfm/exhst cfm
300 235 / 199
400 293 / 244
500 329 / 265
550 341 / 272
600 344 / 276
05-13-2007, 09:51 AM
#6
Registered User
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by VINCE
Those are some sick #'s....
05-13-2007, 11:47 AM
#7
TECH Addict
iTrader: (16)
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Nevada, TX
Posts: 2,218
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Justanotherracecar
I am not that impressed with the intake numbers.......they still look good though... but the exhaust flow low lift numbers are huge!
Trending Topics
05-13-2007, 05:59 PM
#10
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Arlington Tx
Posts: 1,039
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Beast96Z
You should flow them on a 4.060" bore so you can see what they look like on your bore size. The numbers posted are TEA's flow data bench on a 4.125".
Lift 4.125 bore vs 4.030 bore
.300........ 235 vs 234
.400 ....... 293 vs 289
.500 ....... 329 vs 324
.550 ....... 341 vs 335
.600 ....... 344 vs 343
And I have a 4.060 bore so I dont see much of a diff. I hope to put
of power down. Last edited by jeremym; 05-13-2007 at 06:04 PM.
05-14-2007, 05:00 PM
#12
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Arlington Tx
Posts: 1,039
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by xfactor_pitbulls
235@.300 and 293 @.400, are you crazy? Those numbers are just plain sick. Especially through a less than 245cc runner.
05-14-2007, 11:56 PM
#13
Restricted User
Join Date: May 2006
Location: virginia
Posts: 132
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by jeremym
What does everybody think of these heads. They have good intake and good exhaust cfm thru the whole lifts.
Lift intk cfm/exhst cfm
300 235 / 199
400 293 / 244
500 329 / 265
550 341 / 272
600 344 / 276
Lift intk cfm/exhst cfm
300 235 / 199
400 293 / 244
500 329 / 265
550 341 / 272
600 344 / 276
05-15-2007, 04:33 AM
#14
Jan 15th???
We just got the program finished this month to get some final flow numbers, our first attempt at a 240-245 port bombed off the CNC. We are elated with these numbers, you can see we concentrated on the .300"-.500" intake flow area, as that is where all the power is. This head flowing ported L92/ stock LS7 territory with a smallish 2.08" intake valve will yield many happy customers.
We just got the program finished this month to get some final flow numbers, our first attempt at a 240-245 port bombed off the CNC. We are elated with these numbers, you can see we concentrated on the .300"-.500" intake flow area, as that is where all the power is. This head flowing ported L92/ stock LS7 territory with a smallish 2.08" intake valve will yield many happy customers.
05-16-2007, 12:31 PM
#17
Registered User
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Brian Tooley
Jan 15th???
We just got the program finished this month to get some final flow numbers, our first attempt at a 240-245 port bombed off the CNC. We are elated with these numbers, you can see we concentrated on the .300"-.500" intake flow area, as that is where all the power is. This head flowing ported L92/ stock LS7 territory with a smallish 2.08" intake valve will yield many happy customers.
We just got the program finished this month to get some final flow numbers, our first attempt at a 240-245 port bombed off the CNC. We are elated with these numbers, you can see we concentrated on the .300"-.500" intake flow area, as that is where all the power is. This head flowing ported L92/ stock LS7 territory with a smallish 2.08" intake valve will yield many happy customers.
I figured the intake numbers would be closer to what Greg did with those L92's on the smaller valve. The exhaust numbers that you pulled out of the head are simply amazing! Low lift number are nice as well.
What good is a 360 or 350cfm intake head when no production intake will compliment it? Yet those low lift numbers will make serious mad power!
I believe the L92' you speak of flowed right at 300cfm @ .400lift.....
Very nice work Tooley!
btw: a 2.08 intake valve is not small, but a 2.165 is too big!
05-16-2007, 08:01 PM
#19
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Arlington Tx
Posts: 1,039
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Justanotherracecar
I figured the intake numbers would be closer to what Greg did with those L92's on the smaller valve. The exhaust numbers that you pulled out of the head are simply amazing! Low lift number are nice as well.
What good is a 360 or 350cfm intake head when no production intake will compliment it? Yet those low lift numbers will make serious mad power!
I believe the L92' you speak of flowed right at 300cfm @ .400lift.....
Very nice work Tooley!
btw: a 2.08 intake valve is not small, but a 2.165 is too big!
What good is a 360 or 350cfm intake head when no production intake will compliment it? Yet those low lift numbers will make serious mad power!
I believe the L92' you speak of flowed right at 300cfm @ .400lift.....
Very nice work Tooley!
btw: a 2.08 intake valve is not small, but a 2.165 is too big!
U ready "FRUM ROLL" 
