Injector, PE vs RPM, and MAF table tuning info?
#1
TECH Veteran
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Warsaw, Va
Posts: 4,316
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Injector, PE vs RPM, and MAF table tuning info?
just wanted to make sure I got these right..
I know the MAF table when you MULT in +100% numbers it richens
What about the Injector and PE vs RPM?
Do you richen the injector flow tables by mult with -100% numbers like 97% and etc?
Also what about the PE vs RPM? +100% or -100% to richen or lean?
I use to know all of these but its been a good year and ive forgotten LOL
I know the MAF table when you MULT in +100% numbers it richens
What about the Injector and PE vs RPM?
Do you richen the injector flow tables by mult with -100% numbers like 97% and etc?
Also what about the PE vs RPM? +100% or -100% to richen or lean?
I use to know all of these but its been a good year and ive forgotten LOL
#2
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 569
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Injector, PE vs RPM, and MAF table tuning info?
Boy I sure hope that * 100+% richens and less then 100% leans.
I understood it to be:
pe v rpm * 105% richens
pe v rpm * 95% leans
If this is backwards PLEASE someone correct me
I understood it to be:
pe v rpm * 105% richens
pe v rpm * 95% leans
If this is backwards PLEASE someone correct me
#3
TECH Veteran
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Warsaw, Va
Posts: 4,316
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Injector, PE vs RPM, and MAF table tuning info?
Boy I sure hope that * 100+% richens and less then 100% leans.
I understood it to be:
pe v rpm * 105% richens
pe v rpm * 95% leans
If this is backwards PLEASE someone correct me
I understood it to be:
pe v rpm * 105% richens
pe v rpm * 95% leans
If this is backwards PLEASE someone correct me
anyone?? I just wanted to make sure im not loosing my mind
#4
Re: Injector, PE vs RPM, and MAF table tuning info?
Yes, The injector flow table is the one that is "backwards"
BUT, if you think about it a little, it is not backwards at all...
You are telling the computer by multiplying by 95% that the injectors flow less than they really do. Therefore the computer with hold the injectors open longer making you run richer... Not really rocket science.. :p
Tommy
BUT, if you think about it a little, it is not backwards at all...
You are telling the computer by multiplying by 95% that the injectors flow less than they really do. Therefore the computer with hold the injectors open longer making you run richer... Not really rocket science.. :p
Tommy