Forced Induction Superchargers | Turbochargers | Intercoolers

Over spinning a D1?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-05-2007, 05:04 PM
  #1  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
 
Drewstein's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Scottsdale, AZ
Posts: 590
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default Over spinning a D1?

I did a search and didn't find exactly what I'm looking for on the D1 and over spinning it.

I have a 8.5" crank with a 4" blower pulley and I want to go to a 3.4" as the 4" only makes 12# in cold air. In the summer it barley passes 10#s. If I throw a 3.4" in there is my blower going to explode or what?

What's the math on my blower RPM to what it's rated?
Old 07-05-2007, 06:43 PM
  #2  
kp
8 Second Club
iTrader: (34)
 
kp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Knoxville, TN
Posts: 10,852
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

62K is max on a D1SC. it most likely wont explode at 64K but the higher you turn it the better chance of something failing and its just going to get to the point where it will make more heat then boost.

its crank pulley diameter/blower pulley diameter * step up (4.1 for a D1SC) * engine rpm.
Old 07-05-2007, 07:01 PM
  #3  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
 
Drewstein's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Scottsdale, AZ
Posts: 590
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by kp
62K is max on a D1SC. it most likely wont explode at 64K but the higher you turn it the better chance of something failing and its just going to get to the point where it will make more heat then boost.

its crank pulley diameter/blower pulley diameter * step up (4.1 for a D1SC) * engine rpm.
So my math comes up with 59,245rpm for what I'm at right now. It's rated to 61,000 right?

And if I slap the 3.4" on there I'll get 69,000rpm which is 7K to much. But if I go with the 3.8" I'll get 62,000rpm, a much better result!

I think I'll go 3.8 and call it a day. Right?
Old 07-05-2007, 07:14 PM
  #4  
kp
8 Second Club
iTrader: (34)
 
kp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Knoxville, TN
Posts: 10,852
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Its 62K max

I would go with the 3.8 and see where you are at, maybe a 3.7 if you want to try going 2K over
Old 07-05-2007, 07:44 PM
  #5  
FormerVendor
 
Jake@EPP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Hell AFB
Posts: 1,540
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Like others said, it wont blow up, it will make more heat and your IAT will yank timing.
Old 07-06-2007, 11:12 AM
  #6  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
 
Drewstein's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Scottsdale, AZ
Posts: 590
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Jake@EPP
Like others said, it wont blow up, it will make more heat and your IAT will yank timing.
So what you're really saying is slap that 3.4" on there and go for it!

My above math was based on 6,800 where my limiter is set. Since I shift close to that I think I'll go 3.6" and a 110 octane tune. I'll post the results in a new thread in a week or so.

Thanks a ton for the formulas!
Old 07-06-2007, 11:27 AM
  #7  
Dumb Ass Vette Moderator
iTrader: (20)
 
ls1290's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Colorado
Posts: 4,279
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

I do not think there is be much benefit for spinning it that high. The extra air flow will be offset by the much high IAT temps and timing removal.

Keith
Old 07-06-2007, 11:39 AM
  #8  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
 
Drewstein's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Scottsdale, AZ
Posts: 590
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by ls1290
I do not think there is be much benefit for spinning it that high. The extra air flow will be offset by the much high IAT temps and timing removal.

Keith
I believe above the 62,000 limit is where the heat generated is compounded in a drastic increase. I've always understood the D1 to be pretty efficient up to it's limit and many over spin by 2K with good results.

I won't over spin by 7K, but I'll let everyone know how the extra 2K is being taken.
Old 07-06-2007, 03:32 PM
  #9  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
mdhmi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Detroit, MI
Posts: 1,119
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Cool

Is there a certain turbo car you are afraid to lose to?
Old 07-06-2007, 03:43 PM
  #10  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
 
Drewstein's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Scottsdale, AZ
Posts: 590
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by mdhmi
Is there a certain turbo car you are afraid to lose to?
Actually the turbo cars around here I don't have a problem with (Except 2 turbo vipers that put down 1000rwhp on pump but there's no competing with that).

There is however a Ford GT here that's running a 3.2 whipple with meth that put down 750rwhp on a mustang dyno that I want to kill. Since his gearing is perfect for such a torque monster of a blower I'm going to put my rig on kill just because I can.

If he tries to up it any more I'll throw a 100 shot on.
Old 07-06-2007, 04:37 PM
  #11  
7 Second Club
iTrader: (7)
 
NicD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Chandler, AZ
Posts: 2,722
Received 283 Likes on 187 Posts

Default

Drew, use nitrous in addition to the smaller pulley and race gas. No more problem.

As far as local turbo cars not having a problem with... bring it.
Old 07-06-2007, 04:39 PM
  #12  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
 
Drewstein's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Scottsdale, AZ
Posts: 590
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by NicD
Drew, use nitrous in addition to the smaller pulley and race gas. No more problem.
The 3.6" is on the way. I'm going to fill her up with 110 for you tomorrow, just tune it like you do Nic!




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:57 PM.