Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

cam upgrade.Worth it?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-10-2007, 08:11 PM
  #1  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (17)
 
john563's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: dayton ohio
Posts: 1,638
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default cam upgrade.Worth it?

I'm thinking of swapping my cam for more power,but i dont want to lose a ton, of lowend,(keep nice midrange)and i would like 15rwhp(or more) over what i have now to start to make it worth while. I'm an A4(tcissf 3500 stall) Tsp stage 2.5 5.3 heads,tr224/112cam,ported fast 90/90.I put down 417rwhp 407rwt.I dont want ahuge lift where i have to swap springs often,although i do have dual springs.here are a few cams I'm thinking of:

T2 232/234 .595/.598 112 lsa
G5x1 228/232 .588/.574 112lsa
f13 230/232 .595/.585 112lsa
thunder split pattern 230/236 .592/.606 112lsa
custom(pred) 227/230 .629/.600 112+4lsa
or
reverse split cams
MTI x1 230/227 on a112
TR 230/224 on a 111+4
custom(pred)xe-r 228/226 .588/.585 108lsa(hows tuning with a 108?)
230/228 .612/.588 110-1 (110lsa/111ICL
will one of these cams give me what i want and keep decent lowend and 15rwhp(or more) or should i go big like an Ms3. Would going to true dual exhaust be an easier option of getting more N/A?
or if its not worth it and spray what i have.
thanks
john
Old 07-11-2007, 09:23 AM
  #2  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (17)
 
john563's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: dayton ohio
Posts: 1,638
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Anyone?
Old 07-11-2007, 08:32 PM
  #3  
Staging Lane
iTrader: (1)
 
hissin'98's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Mesa, AZ
Posts: 88
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

You would sacrifice a little drivability if you went with a bigger cam but if you tagged your present set up with a 100-125 shot, it's gonna make some great power. Tune it for some spray, my op.
Old 07-11-2007, 11:00 PM
  #4  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (17)
 
john563's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: dayton ohio
Posts: 1,638
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

most people tell me its not worth the cam upgrade and i should just spray. I just want a more N/A power,butif I'll oly get 10rwhp or less I'll go for the spray
Old 07-12-2007, 01:24 AM
  #5  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
 
TXZ28LS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Classified
Posts: 6,164
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

either the TR TRAK cam or the reverse split cams!!
Old 07-12-2007, 04:41 AM
  #6  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (2)
 
GTObsessor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: CA
Posts: 860
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

just spray it dude... make sure you get it retuned.
Old 07-12-2007, 07:04 AM
  #7  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (17)
 
john563's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: dayton ohio
Posts: 1,638
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by GTObsessor
just spray it dude... make sure you get it retuned.
whether i go with a different cam or spray,I'll tune no questions about it.
Old 07-12-2007, 08:02 AM
  #8  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (31)
 
RE AND CHERYL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Dover DE
Posts: 1,207
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

All that work for only 15rwhp. Your barely gonna feel that at all. And the low ned you loose is gonna make the car feel slower and reduce drivability. How about a set of 1.8 ratio rockers. You'd probably make your goal with those with no change in drivability.

Re'
Old 07-12-2007, 08:14 AM
  #9  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (17)
 
john563's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: dayton ohio
Posts: 1,638
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by RE AND CHERYL
All that work for only 15rwhp. Your barely gonna feel that at all. And the low ned you loose is gonna make the car feel slower and reduce drivability. How about a set of 1.8 ratio rockers. You'd probably make your goal with those with no change in drivability.

Re'
That has crossed my mind,but thunder racing does not recommened 1.8 rockers for their cams,due to the agressive ramp
Old 07-12-2007, 08:15 AM
  #10  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (6)
 
Mac 2002 SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Richmond, VA.
Posts: 916
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by john563
most people tell me its not worth the cam upgrade and i should just spray. I just want a more N/A power,butif I'll oly get 10rwhp or less I'll go for the spray
i agree with them also. why go threw the trouble of a cam change when you can just change a jet-size to whatever you want ?

but i do understand you want to go a little bigger n/a. you should get a little more than 10rwhp if you decide go with those cams you listed . your current set up seems it should be strong enough for a high to mid- 11 second on motor ...right ?
Old 07-12-2007, 08:22 AM
  #11  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (22)
 
Stang's Bane's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Mont Belvieu, TX
Posts: 2,649
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

What is your exhaust setup??? Did I miss that??
Old 07-12-2007, 08:28 AM
  #12  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (17)
 
john563's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: dayton ohio
Posts: 1,638
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Mac 2002 SS
i agree with them also. why go threw the trouble of a cam change when you can just change a jet-size to whatever you want ?

but i do understand you want to go a little bigger n/a. you should get a little more than 10rwhp if you decide go with those cams you listed . your current set up seems it should be strong enough for a high to mid- 11 second on motor ...right ?
I guess you always want a little more N/A,atleast in my case
Old 07-12-2007, 08:29 AM
  #13  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (17)
 
john563's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: dayton ohio
Posts: 1,638
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Stang's Bane
What is your exhaust setup??? Did I miss that??
Hedman Lt headers,ory.dynomouth
Old 07-12-2007, 08:56 AM
  #14  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (22)
 
Stang's Bane's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Mont Belvieu, TX
Posts: 2,649
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by john563
I'm thinking of swapping my cam for more power,but i dont want to lose a ton, of lowend,(keep nice midrange)and i would like 15rwhp(or more) over what i have now to start to make it worth while. I'm an A4(tcissf 3500 stall) Tsp stage 2.5 5.3 heads,tr224/112cam,ported fast 90/90.I put down 417rwhp 407rwt.I dont want ahuge lift where i have to swap springs often,although i do have dual springs.here are a few cams I'm thinking of:

T2 232/234 .595/.598 112 lsa
G5x1 228/232 .588/.574 112lsa
f13 230/232 .595/.585 112lsa
thunder split pattern 230/236 .592/.606 112lsa

custom(pred) 227/230 .629/.600 112+4lsa
or
reverse split cams
MTI x1 230/227 on a112
TR 230/224 on a 111+4
custom(pred)xe-r 228/226 .588/.585 108lsa(hows tuning with a 108?)
230/228 .612/.588 110-1 (110lsa/111ICL
will one of these cams give me what i want and keep decent lowend and 15rwhp(or more) or should i go big like an Ms3. Would going to true dual exhaust be an easier option of getting more N/A?
or if its not worth it and spray what i have.
thanks
john
I would look at these two. And then spray it. If you are going to spray for sure, look at the thunder cam a little stronger. JMHO




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:39 AM.