Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Cam for a 2800lbs. car.

Old 07-11-2007, 01:57 PM
  #1  
Teching In
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
XxMerlinxX's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Cam for a 2800lbs. car.

So if I can ever get my hands on a pullout, I'm dropping an LS1/T56 into my 3rd gen RX-7. I was wondering about cam selections as far as what to look at. From what I've been reading, it seems like 228/232 or 230/232 would be a good choice, but I was wondering if I could get away with something a little bigger. This car's my DD, so it has to be streetable, but I didn't know how much the weight would have an effect on selections. Any info/advice would be greatly appreciated as I'm coming from the rotary world, so I'm having to relearn about piston engines.
Old 07-11-2007, 08:00 PM
  #2  
11 Second Club
 
LrngCrv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Pusan, ROK
Posts: 187
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Depends on your gearing, how much you want to pay for gas, whether you are going to do a lot more engine mods down the road and a few other things.

If you want the a wild sounding car I think that RX7 would probably benefit more from one of those violent ramp and high lift/duration cams than a stockish F-body would. And you can get some good performance w/o even changing the heads if you were on a strict budget.

If you want something tamer then a mild cam/heads would give you just as much power (maybe lower peak numbers, depending on cam, but probably better E/Ts). PP LS6 heads that flow amazing numbers are going for around $900 now. And the milder cam would be easier to drive and get you better city mpg.

It mostly depends on your preference.
Old 07-11-2007, 08:20 PM
  #3  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (22)
 
slow trap's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: tennessee
Posts: 2,639
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

with a car that light you could go with a fairly large cam since you shouldn't need as much torque to get that thing moving. something like a torquer2 (232 234) or similar would be a decent choice.the tune is what makes or breaks driveability.
Old 07-11-2007, 09:26 PM
  #4  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
 
sciff5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,308
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

I've got the same question only my Rx7 is going to be stripped and be around 2400-2500lbs. This is a weekend car at best and barely streetable. I wanted to go pretty damn wild.. probably either a TRex or bigger. Just wanted to know what you guys thought of that.
Old 07-11-2007, 09:30 PM
  #5  
Teching In
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
XxMerlinxX's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Yeah, while reading up on the board, I had to keep reminding myself that my car's a lot lighter than an f-body, so I could probably get away with a cam that's a little larger than usual. I'm probably going to stick with the stock heads for the time being, but will have LTs and pulley at least. Later on I'll be looking for better heads, 90/90, 100 shot, etc. etc. As far as gas mileage goes, anything's going to be better than what I got on the rotary, 14-15mph city and 19 at best on hwy, so no worries there. I think my biggest problem is going to be traction, so losing some torque down low really isn't a concern.
Old 07-11-2007, 10:07 PM
  #6  
Staging Lane
iTrader: (13)
 
rosey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 91
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I'm running a comp XE-R 232/240 112+4 in my rx7. I just put it in yesterday, but I broke my stock pulley taking it off, so I ordered an aftermarket one and now I have to wait for it =(

Another fact that might not be too well know in these parts, is that almost all rx7s have a 4.11 final drive, and the only other(simple) option is a 3.9. With a lighter car and this gearing, you can pretty much get away with whatever you want as long as its tuned properly. I will be going to a 3.55 final drive via 03/04 cobra rear, and don't intend to have any problems with the cam I'm running.

In a street car, I would try to keep the power down in the useable range, something in the upper 220s to 230s for duration, keeping decent compression and valve events should do well. If you want all that you can get out of it, then one of the big popular cams(t-rex, ms4, vindicator) would make good choices - but they do come with disadvantages, like being hard to tune, having an *** hair worth of ptv, won't really take off until 3-4K+rpm...don't forget the toll lots of high rpms can take on your engine.

I love the way the stock cam just rips from down low, but hate how it falls down a bit up top. I hope the cam I chose will be a good compromise, but I guess theres only one way to find out for sure...
Old 07-12-2007, 12:48 AM
  #7  
11 Second Club
 
LrngCrv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Pusan, ROK
Posts: 187
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

In my personal opinion of what I would do w/ stock heads:

Get some really agressive lobes with around a 240 intake/exhaust and a slightly over .600 lift and a light weight drivetrain (aluminum flywheel, pressure plate, driveshaft, etc. for fast revs and response) with free flowing intake/exhaust and a fuel system to keep up with it. Keep the final gear you have and just spend some money getting that power stuck to the ground (bigger tires, stiffer suspension, lower angle of body weight inertia on that rear end). You will lose a bit of low end torque but with your car's weight (especially if you do some weight reduction) you will not notice much on the lower end torque. Get an amazing tune and you will be smoking most at the track. Plus an RX7 with a large cam and free flowing exhaust would sound amazing, especially from what most would expect. I bet you would be pulling high 10s with slicks and a setup like that and it really isn't THAT expensive.

I don't think this would work as well with a heavier car but would be awesome for the cost on an RX7. Also I'm no expert/mechanic, there are probably others that would have much better ideas than me. Just my thoughts.
Old 07-12-2007, 06:07 AM
  #8  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (22)
 
slow trap's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: tennessee
Posts: 2,639
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

i'm not a real fan of the really agressive lobes,especially for a dd car. in my opinion a great cam would be something like a 234-236 on intake, 240 on exhaust with xer lobes on a 112 +4 or so.
^ almost the exact cam rosey has.
with a final drive of 3.90 or 4.10 you can use a slightly bigger stick.i didn't know that was about the only option in those cars,learn something new every day.
pm someone like predator z or some of the other guys that are really in the know on these lsx engines and see what they have to say.
Old 07-12-2007, 09:31 AM
  #9  
TECH Senior Member
 
PREDATOR-Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: BFE
Posts: 14,620
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 16 Posts

Default

Exhaust is gonna be a factor and you said something a bit big. Now a question is are you gonna stay stock heads/
If yes I would vote
234/242 .598 .610 112+2 since M6 (Custom XE-R comp cam)
Old 07-12-2007, 08:04 PM
  #10  
Teching In
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
XxMerlinxX's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Yeah, I'm going to be on stock heads for a while. Is there anyone running around with a similar setup?
Old 07-13-2007, 12:27 AM
  #11  
TECH Senior Member
 
PREDATOR-Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: BFE
Posts: 14,620
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 16 Posts

Default

Yeah, plenty poeple, this is basicaly a G5X3 but with a +2 advance instead of +4. Since you're M6 and a light car the +2 will carry a bit further in the rpms.

What yoear is the block you are putting in?
Old 07-13-2007, 01:04 AM
  #12  
Teching In
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
XxMerlinxX's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

It's an '03. I finally found a pullout lastnight and will be driving to get it soon. I don't know if there are any mods done to it already, but I'll just assume it's stock for the time being. I had found a site that listed the differences between the different years, but I can't find it now.
Old 07-13-2007, 03:52 AM
  #13  
TECH Senior Member
 
PREDATOR-Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: BFE
Posts: 14,620
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 16 Posts

Default

That is good. 03 is a good year, rod bolts and block design are finaly refined by then, intake is LS6.
I'll give you my honest opinion. A good cam that will act big and provide good flat trq across with nice high rpm output, minimum supporting mods and very nice performance IMO would be a reverse split.

230/228 .592/.588 110-1 LSA (Yes you're reading correctly retarded 1* for VE tailoring), custom order Comp Cam XE-R grind

Valve Events:

IVO>4
IVC>46
EVO>43
EVC>5
ECL> 109
9* Overlap

Description of behavior:
>It is intake biased from TDC so it will have the means to carry very well past peak
>It has a 46* IVC and due to LS6 intake it will peak in the 6300 rpm neighborhood.
>It has 43* EVO so midrange trq for acceleration will be really strong and very flat trq curve
> 9* Overlap is a nice chopchop with plenty power potential (equivalent to a 232/234 112)

The power band should be from 2200>6700

Last edited by PREDATOR-Z; 07-13-2007 at 01:07 PM.
Old 07-13-2007, 01:02 PM
  #14  
On The Tree
iTrader: (1)
 
GTOpowered240sx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Macon, Ga
Posts: 148
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I went with a MS4 for my 240sx
Old 07-15-2007, 01:24 AM
  #15  
Teching In
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
XxMerlinxX's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by slow trap
i'm not a real fan of the really agressive lobes,especially for a dd car. in my opinion a great cam would be something like a 234-236 on intake, 240 on exhaust with xer lobes on a 112 +4 or so.
After reading some more, I'd be afraid of getting some surge with something that big. How streetable is that cam?
Old 07-15-2007, 01:54 AM
  #16  
Staging Lane
iTrader: (13)
 
rosey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 91
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

The tune will ultimately determine how streetable it is...I wouldn't worry much about streetability, as even a trex could drive like a baby if you put the time in working the bugs out, or paid someone else to put the time in.

The reverse split that predator mentioned would work nicely, although I wouldn't have chosen it because it wouldn't work quite as well with 150+ hits of spray. Glad to see his first recommendation isn't too far from what I have


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:46 AM.