Forced Induction Superchargers | Turbochargers | Intercoolers

FMIC Design Flaw

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-23-2007, 10:05 PM
  #1  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
c5_from_jc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default FMIC Design Flaw

I know I will get blasted for this, but does anyone agree with me that a FMIC that blocks air flow to the radiator is a poor engineering design choice? I know the FMIC lowers IATs nicely, but the car's coolant temps will heat up FAST under boost making it not too nice for long term acceleration. Can this be fixed?
Old 07-23-2007, 10:15 PM
  #2  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (16)
 
NoGamesLS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 800
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Where do you suggest it be placed?
Old 07-23-2007, 10:17 PM
  #3  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
c5_from_jc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by NoGamesLS1
Where do you suggest it be placed?

I don't have a suggestion, that is why I am asking the question. Maybe this is the reason NA is the way to go?
Old 07-23-2007, 10:56 PM
  #4  
9 Second Club
iTrader: (37)
 
cablebandit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Cleveland, OH
Posts: 7,903
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

mine gained 4 degrees of coolant temp in the 1/4
Old 07-23-2007, 11:05 PM
  #5  
TECH Resident
 
RW99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Castro Valley, CA
Posts: 832
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Depends on what you mean by "long term acceleration". On f-bodies, IMO few of us with full FMIC setups have problems cooling when we're driving at speed... it's when we've got to slow down into commute stop-and-go traffic that we start to overheat. That air dam at the bottom of the rad does a great job of scooping plenty of air up and through the radiator when the car's at 50+ mph. But I suppose you'd also run into similar problems at the track, if you're running fairly often on a hot day without shutting down in between.

I like my Griffin IC, and I like having big *** pusher fans mounted right on the radiator; that was the solution to my cooling woes. I lost the AC, but I wasn't using it on hot days anyway... because I'd overheat.

Consider a methanol kit if you really want to achieve low IATs.
Old 07-23-2007, 11:12 PM
  #6  
Closed Sponsor Account
iTrader: (3)
 
Josh@MASPORT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Boca Raton
Posts: 235
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

i get the best of both worlds



Old 07-23-2007, 11:20 PM
  #7  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (4)
 
Boostaholic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Boise, ID
Posts: 2,542
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by c5_from_jc
I don't have a suggestion, that is why I am asking the question. Maybe this is the reason NA is the way to go?

my car with the biggest A2A intercooler that can be fit in front of a radiator on a camaro my car runs 160-170deg
Old 07-23-2007, 11:32 PM
  #8  
9 Second Club
iTrader: (30)
 
code4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,419
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

On my fbods the radiator is blocked anyway. It is the airdam below that directs air to the radiator. I believe my rad gets more air with the intercooler than it did before.
Old 07-24-2007, 12:02 AM
  #9  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (4)
 
Boostaholic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Boise, ID
Posts: 2,542
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

i have no air dam either
Old 07-24-2007, 12:21 AM
  #10  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (26)
 
Jditlfm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Brockport NY
Posts: 1,456
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Josh@MASPORT
i get the best of both worlds
I like that setup a lot, that would probably work very well on a lt1 trans am.
Old 07-24-2007, 05:06 AM
  #11  
EPP
FormerVendor
iTrader: (22)
 
EPP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 13,063
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

We haven't noticed a big difference in engine temp's with our f body front mount intercooler kits. Bob
Old 07-24-2007, 05:51 AM
  #12  
TECH Cry Baby BOSS APPROVED!
iTrader: (5)
 
Urban Legend's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 5,799
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by c5_from_jc
Maybe this is the reason NA is the way to go?
N/A for the win!
Old 07-24-2007, 05:53 AM
  #13  
TECH Addict
 
engineermike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,153
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by c5_from_jc
... Maybe this is the reason NA is the way to go?
There are alot of reasons to go NA, but this isn't one of them. A turbo car with a FMIC running a few degrees warmer than stock will still make way more power than a stout NA setup.
Old 07-24-2007, 05:56 AM
  #14  
TECH Addict
 
engineermike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,153
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by NoGamesLS1
Where do you suggest it be placed?
Put it at the back where all the turbo's are going these days! Genius!
Old 07-24-2007, 07:17 AM
  #15  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (48)
 
smokinHawk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Columbus, ohio
Posts: 7,354
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

when i had my TTI street kit the IC was mounted on top of the AC heat exchanger /radiator
I didnt notice any changes with the coolant temps (ofcoarse the gauge is stock and not that accurate) but i never had any overheating problems. the IAT where very high though, bout near 200°

with my custom kit the IC is up in the nose with the license area cut out away from the radiator., i have a good temp gauge, so coolant temps are good, and my IAT are much lower i think the hottest i have seen was 130° on a 100° day.
Old 07-24-2007, 07:20 AM
  #16  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
c5_from_jc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Exotic Performance Plus
We haven't noticed a big difference in engine temp's with our f body front mount intercooler kits. Bob
I probably wasn't clear enough in my original post. I though this was a general problem, but maybe it's just a problem with my Procharger and C6 Corvette?

For drag racing this is probably ok, but if i ever take this to a road course I can't see this working. I didn't realize these kits would not work on a road coarse (due to heat build up) when I purchased it. I know i could do Alky to keep the IATs down, but what could I do about the coolant temp? I don't think putting in a bigger radiator will help as a friend of mine tried it and he still had high coolant temps. I think this comes gown to getting air flow to the radiator and with Procharger's architecture, I don't see how to do it. If I could solve this it would be great.
Old 07-24-2007, 08:41 AM
  #17  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (37)
 
rufretic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,935
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

The fmic isn't blocking anything. If anything it's letting more air flow through. How could a fully intact bumper flow more air than one with a huge hole in it? Yes it has to go through the intercooler first but before that, the bumber was letting no air through. It's the supercharger heating everything up, it's just a matter of keeping it as cool as possible with the added heat. Without the fmic, it would be even hotter. My car actually runs cooler now than it did n/a. It stays right around 180. Just make sure you keep the scoop under the radiator because I did notice my temps go up when I had that removed.
Old 07-24-2007, 08:58 AM
  #18  
Dumb Ass Vette Moderator
iTrader: (20)
 
ls1290's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Colorado
Posts: 4,279
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

With a fresh source of cold air and good fans, a FMIC is fine sitting in front of the radiator.

Keith
Old 07-24-2007, 09:49 AM
  #19  
TS6
10 Second Club
iTrader: (41)
 
TS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Champaign Il
Posts: 2,989
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by c5_from_jc
I probably wasn't clear enough in my original post. I though this was a general problem, but maybe it's just a problem with my Procharger and C6 Corvette?

For drag racing this is probably ok, but if i ever take this to a road course I can't see this working. I didn't realize these kits would not work on a road coarse (due to heat build up) when I purchased it. I know i could do Alky to keep the IATs down, but what could I do about the coolant temp? I don't think putting in a bigger radiator will help as a friend of mine tried it and he still had high coolant temps. I think this comes gown to getting air flow to the radiator and with Procharger's architecture, I don't see how to do it. If I could solve this it would be great.

As mentioned, none of the airflow to your radiator comes from the front of the car in stock configuration. It comes up from underneath, via the airdam. Check it out. If you have altered that airdam/shroud at all, you may have cooling problems.
Old 07-24-2007, 10:18 AM
  #20  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (10)
 
Fastbird93's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Fort Wayne, IN
Posts: 1,110
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Jditlfm
I like that setup a lot, that would probably work very well on a lt1 trans am.
That's exactly what I was just thinking. How about some more info (mounting, efficiency, ect) on this setup.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:59 PM.